Group Consensus Decision-Making Methods with DHHFLPRs, LPOs and Self-confident DHLPRs

  • Xunjie GouEmail author
  • Zeshui Xu
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 396)


In GDM processes, after ensuring that all DHHFLPRs are of acceptable consistencies, we cannot overlook another important step: the consensus reaching process, which is an essential process in GDM for enabling sufficient communications among all experts and obtaining an accepted decision result. Therefore, in this chapter, we will first focus on developing methods to manage the consensus reaching process and ensure that all experts reach consensus.


  1. Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43(3):713–721Google Scholar
  2. Chen X, Zhang HJ, Dong YC (2015) The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: a survey. Inf Fusion 24:72–83Google Scholar
  3. Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawford G, Williams C (1985) A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. J Math Psychol 29(4):387–405zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Del Moral MJ, Chiclana F, Tapia JM, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) A comparative study on consensus measures in group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(8):1624–1638Google Scholar
  6. Dombi J (1995) A general framework for the utility-based and outranking methods. Fuzzy logic and soft computing. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 202–208zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong QX, Cooper O (2016) A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making. Eur J Oper Res 250(2):521–530MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY, Feng B (2010) The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. Eur J Oper Res 203(2):455–463zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong YC, Ding ZG, Martínez L, Herrera F (2017) Managing consensus based on leadership in opinion dynamics. Inf Sci 397–398:187–205zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Fan ZP, Ma J, Jiang YP, Sun YH, Ma L (2006) A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 174(1):311–321zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman HH, Amoo T (1999) Rating the rating scales. J Mark Manage 9(3):114–123Google Scholar
  12. González-Pachón J, Romero C (2001) Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach. Comput Oper Res 28:827–834zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Gou XJ, Liao HC, Wang XX, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2020a) Consensus based on multiplicative consistent double hierarchy linguistic preferences: Venture capital in real estate market. Int J Strateg Prop Manag 42(1):1–23Google Scholar
  14. Gou XJ, Xu ZS (2019) Research on decision-making methods with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preferences. Sichuan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  15. Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2018) Consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 157:20–33Google Scholar
  16. Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Wang XX, Liao HC (2020b) Managing consensus reaching process with self-confident double hierarchy linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making (Accept)Google Scholar
  17. Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Zhou W (2020c) Managing consensus by multiple stages optimization models with linguistic preference orderings and double hierarchy linguistic preferences. Technol Econ Dev Econ. Scholar
  18. He Y, Xu ZS (2018) A consensus framework with different preference ordering structures and its applications in human resource selection. Comput Ind Eng 118:80–88Google Scholar
  19. Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154(1):98–109MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13(5):644–658Google Scholar
  21. Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1988) A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 34(3):316–325MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Kacprzyk J, Roubens M (1988) Non-conventional preference relations in decision making. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamis NH, Chiclana F, Levesley J (2018) Preference similarity network structural equivalence clustering based consensus group decision making model. Appl Soft Comput 67:706–720Google Scholar
  24. Karplus KP, Diederichs K (2012) Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336(6084):1030–1033Google Scholar
  25. Kou G, Lin C (2014) A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP. Eur J Oper Res 235(1):225–232MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ, Xu DL (2016) An enhanced consensus reaching process in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 329:274–286Google Scholar
  27. Liu WQ, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Group decision making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 16(4):429–447MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu JP, Song JM, Xu Q, Tao ZF, Chen HY (2019) Group decision making based on DEA cross-efficiency with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 18:345–370MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Ma LC (2016) A new group ranking approach for ordinal preferences based on group maximum consensus sequences. Eur J Oper Res 251(1):171–181MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Meng FY, Tang J, Zhang SL (2019) Interval linguistic fuzzy decision making in perspective of preference relations. Technol Econ Dev Econ 25(5):998–1015Google Scholar
  31. Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, Pérez IJ, Samuylov K, Selamat A, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) A group decision making support system for the Web: How to work in environments with a high number of participants and alternatives. Appl Soft Comput 68:191–201Google Scholar
  32. Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, Samuylov K, Ureña R, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) Carrying out consensual group decision making processes under social networks using sentiment analysis over comparative expressions. Knowl Based Syst 165:335–345Google Scholar
  33. Park JH, Cho HJ, Kwun YC (2011) Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 10:233–253MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Parreiras R, Ekel P, Bernardes F (2012) A dynamic consensus scheme based on a nonreciprocal fuzzy preference relation modeling. Inf Sci 211:1–17MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramanathan R, Ganesh LS (1994) Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages. Eur J Oper Res 79(2):249–265zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Tanino T (1988) Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Non-conventional preference relations in decision making. Springer, Berlin, pp 54–71zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Wan SP, Wang F, Dong JY (2018) A group decision-making method considering both the group consensus and multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 466:109–128MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu XL, Liao HC (2019) A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. Eur J Oper Res 272(3):1017–1027MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2016) Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Omega 65(3):28–40Google Scholar
  41. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2018) A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Inf Fusion 41:217–231Google Scholar
  42. Wu J, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) A visual interaction consensus model for social network group decision making with trust propagation. Knowl Based Syst 122:39–50Google Scholar
  43. Wu ZB, Jin BM, Xu JP (2018) Local feedback strategy for consensus building with probability-hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 67:691–705Google Scholar
  44. Wu ZB, Huang S, Xu JP (2019a) Multi-stage optimization models for individual consistency and group consensus with preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 275:182–194MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu HY, Ren PJ, Xu ZS (2019b) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic consensus model based on trust-recommendation mechanism for hospital expert consultation. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(1):2227–2241Google Scholar
  46. Xu YJ, Herrera F, Wang HM (2016) A distance-based framework to deal with ordinal and additive inconsistencies for fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Inf Sci 328:189–205zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu YJ, Wen XW, Zhang WC (2018) A two-stage consensus method for large-scale multi-attribute group decision making with an application to earthquake shelter selection. Comput Ind Eng 116:113–129Google Scholar
  48. Yu DJ, Xu ZS (2019) Intuitionistic fuzzy two-sided matching model and its application to personnel-position matching problems. J Oper Res Soc 71(2):312–321Google Scholar
  49. Zhang ZM, Chen SM (2019) A consistency and consensus-based method for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 501:317–336MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang ZM, Pedrycz W (2018) Goal programming approaches to managing consistency and consensus for intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3261–3275Google Scholar
  51. Zhang BW, Liang HM, Gao Y, Zhang GQ (2018) The optimization-based aggregation and consensus with minimum-cost in group decision making under incomplete linguistic distribution context. Knowl Based Syst 162:92–102Google Scholar
  52. Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Francisco C, Yu S (2019) Consensus efficiency in group decision making: a comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design. Eur J Oper Res 275(2):580–598MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhu B, Xu ZS (2018) Probability-hesitant fuzzy sets and the representation of preference relations. Technol Econ Dev Econ 24(3):1029–1040Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations