Advertisement

Double Hierarchy Linguistic Term Set and Its Extensions

  • Xunjie GouEmail author
  • Zeshui Xu
Chapter
  • 2 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 396)

Abstract

Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become more and more popular and important in real life and consists of many research fields such as language recognition, image recognition, natural language processing and expert systems.

References

  1. Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009) Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(1):14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY (2008) On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 189(2):430–444MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubois D (2011) The role of fuzzy sets indecision sciences: old techniques and new directions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 184:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fu ZG, Liao HC (2019) Unbalanced double hierarchy linguistic term set: the TOPSIS method for multi-expert qualitative decision making involving green mine selection. Inf Fusion 51:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. González-Pachón J, Romero C (2001) Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach. Comput Oper Res 28:827–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gou XJ, Liao HC, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2017) Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and MULTIMOORA method: a case of study to evaluate the implementation status of haze controlling measures. Inf Fusion 38:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gou XJ, Liao HC, Xu ZS, Min R, Herrera F (2019) Group decision making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations: consistency based measures, index and repairing algorithms and decision model. Inf Sci 489:93–112MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2018a) Consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowl-Based Syst 157:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Liao HC, Herrera F (2018b) Multiple criteria decision making based on distance and similarity measures with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment. Comput Ind Eng 126:516–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Liao HC, Herrera F (2020a) A consensus model to manage minority opinions and noncooperative behaviors in large-scale GDM with double hierarchy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Cybern.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.2985069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Zhou W (2020b) Managing consensus by multiple stages optimization models with linguistic preference orderings and double hierarchy linguistic preferences. Technol Econ Dev Econ 26(3):642–674Google Scholar
  13. He Y, Xu ZS (2018) A consensus framework with different preference ordering structures and its applications in human resource selection. Comput Ind Eng 118:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(6):746–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hervés-Beloso C, Cruces HV (2018) Continuous preference orderings representable by utility functions. J Econ Surv 33(1):179–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liang HM, Xiong W, Dong YC (2018) A prospect theory-based method for fusing the individual preference-approval structures in group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 117:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Millet I (1997) The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation methods in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 6:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Montserrat-Adell J, Xu ZS, Gou XJ, Agell N (2019) Free double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: an application on raking alternatives in GDM. Inf Fusion 47:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schubert J (1995) On p in a decision-theoretic apparatus of Dempster-Shafer theory. Int J Approx Reason 13:185–200MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12:117–131MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang XD, Gou XJ, Xu ZS (2020) Assessment of Traffic congestion with ORESTE method under double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set. Appl Soft Comput 86:105864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang H, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ (2018) Linguistic terms with weakened hedges: a model for qualitative decision making under uncertainty. Inf Sci 433:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52:395–407MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu ZS (2004a) A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 166(1–4):19–30MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu ZS (2004b) Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. Inf Sci 168(1–4):171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu ZS (2005) Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33(3):249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu ZS (2013) Group decision making model and approach based on interval preference orderings. Comput Ind Eng 64:797–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu ZS, Wang H (2017) On the syntax and semantics of virtual linguistic terms for information fusion in decision making. Inf Fusion 34:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yager RR (2004) On the retranslation process in Zadeh’s paradigm of computing with words. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 34(2):1184–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zadeh LA (2012) Computing with words: what is computing with words (CWW)?. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang BW, Liang HM, Zhang GQ, Xu YF (2018a) Minimum deviation ordinal consensus reaching in GDM with heterogeneous preference structures. Appl Soft Comput 67:658–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang BW, Liang HM, Gao Y, Zhang GQ (2018b) The optimization-based aggregation and consensus with minimum-cost in group decision making under incomplete linguistic distribution context. Knowl-Based Syst 162:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations