Advertisement

Safety Management in Accordance with Industry 4.0 Requirements: Analysis and Evaluation of the Level of Digitalization in the Slovak Companies

  • Hana Pacaiova
  • Renata Turisova
  • Anna NagyovaEmail author
  • Milan Oravec
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1204)

Abstract

Digitalization of industrial companies brings a lot of advantages for their management in the global entrepreneurial environment. Shortening of new product development, communication with customers already in their design phase, ‘early’ prevention of potential errors and discrepancies in processes, online status monitoring of important devices etc., enable to introduce effective management and meeting the stakeholders’ needs. However, these advantages are conditioned by applying the suitable tools for processing and evaluating data in core processes of an organization. Industry 4.0 (I4.0) is a general term specifying the level of automation and digitalization implementation at the management of industrial as well as public activities within the advanced society.

Protection of human in work environment in the EU has been implemented as Frame Directives for 30 years. Protection of property – intellectual property, its importance in today’s environment grows exponentially with the level of implemented digitalization. For this reason, it is important to apply such safety management tools, so that they enable a complex approach to the protection of physical but also intellectual property of an organization.

The objective of the study was to find the real level of Industry 4.0 factors implementation and asses the status of complex safety in the selected industrial organizations in the Slovak republic. The form of questioning stemmed from the exceptionality model – EFQM. Basic parameters of the requirements resulting from the I4.0 factor analysis were created. The area of results was structured in such a way so that it is possible to prove the level of digitalization achievement and complex safety management in companies operating in Slovakia and their readiness for current trends in I4.0 and their development.

Keywords

Integrated safety Model EFQM Industry 4.0 Boxplot diagram 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This contribution is the result of the project implementation APVV-15-0351 “Development and Application of a Risk Management Model in the Setting of Technological Systems in Compliance with Industry 4.0 Strategy” and VEGA project No.1/0121/18 “Development of methods of implementation and verification of complex security solution in Smart Factory as part of Industry Strategy 4.0”.

References

  1. 1.
    Ślusarczyk, B.: Industry 4.0 – are we ready? Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 17(1), 232–248 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.17.1.19. BazTechCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ganzarain, J., Errasti, N.: Three stage maturity model in SME’s toward Industry 4.0. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. (JIEM) 9(5), 1119–1128 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kagermann, H.: Change through digitization value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. In: Albach, H., Meffert, H., Pinkwart, A., Reichwald, R. (eds.) Management of Permanent Change, pp. 23–45. Springer (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05014-6_2
  4. 4.
    Grenčíková, A., Kordoš, M., Sokol, J.: The approach to Industry 4.0 within the Slovak business environment. Soc. Sci. 8(104), 1–11 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8040104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramirez-Peňa, M., Sotano, A.J.S., Peréz-Fernandéz, V., Abad, F.J., Batista, M.: Achieving a sustainable shipbuilding supply chain under I4.0 perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 244, 1–11 (2020).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bangemann, T., et al.: Integration of classical components into industrial cyber–physical systems. Proc. IEEE 104(5), 947–959 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2510981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Voigt, K.I., Müller, J., Veile, W.J., Becker, W., Stradtmann, M: Industrie 4.0 – Risiken für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen. In: Geschäftsmodelle in der digitalen Welt, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 517–538. Springer (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22129-4_26
  8. 8.
    Pfeiffer, S.: Berufliche Bildung 4.0? Ueberlegungen zur Arbeitsmarkt-und Innovationsfaehigkeit. Industrielle Beziehungen 23(1), 25–44 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1688/IndB-2016-01-PfeifferCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Veile, J.W., Muller, J.M., Voigt, K.I.: Lessons learned from Industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-08-2018-0270
  10. 10.
    Suárez, E., et al.: Quantitative research on the EFQM excellence model: a systematic literature review (1991–2015). Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 23(3), 147–156 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blecha, P., Durakbasa, N., Holub, M.: Digitized production – its potentials and hazards. In: Durakbasa, N., Gencyilmaz, M. (eds.) 2018 Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research, pp. 402–411. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92267-6_35
  12. 12.
    Andersen, H., Lawrie, G., Shulver, M.: The balanced scorecard vs. the EFQM business excellence model - which is the better strategic management tool? 2GC Active Management (2003). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237117368_The_Balanced_Scorecard_vs_the_EFQM_Business_Excellence_Model_-_which_is_the_better_strategic_management_tool/link/5954d0eaa6fdcc16978cb538/download
  13. 13.
    Hanulakova, E., Dano, F.: Circular economy as a new managerial approach. AD ALTA-J. Interdisc. Res. 8(1), 95–98 (2018). MagnanimitasGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Urbančíková, N., Zgodavová, K.: Sustainability, resilience and population ageing along schengen’s eastern border. Sustainability 11(10), 1–18 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tureková, I., Mračková, E., Marková, I.: Determination of waste industrial dust safety characteristics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(12), 2103 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hana Pacaiova
    • 1
  • Renata Turisova
    • 1
  • Anna Nagyova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Milan Oravec
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Safety and Quality DepartmentTechnical University of KosiceKošiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations