A Discussion of Quantitative Stress Analysis in Long-Term Embarked Work

  • Salvador ÁvilaEmail author
  • Ronald Boring
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1204)


A network of factors in a serial, parallel and cross way transfers the hazard energy until it causes the accident. Ávila adjusted the Swiss cheese model to 8 layers of human elements and 9 layers of dynamic-fallible HF. This discussion will test tools to measure the level of stress and relate causal factors. The relationships between factors in critical activities are studied to prevent loss of perception of new emerging problems. The level of stress is impacted by activities confined progressively. The mind map is altered by the level of stress and affects the outcome tasks. The quantitative relationships try to signal a max stress level. Tasks, skills, technologies, risks are based on maintaining motivation around the psychological contract. Cognitive degradation caused by chronic stress, and, failure caused by acute stress are present in critical tasks and are discussed in divers JOB, oil production operators and astronauts to Mars.


Progressive stress Hazard energy Task Health Operation mode 


  1. 1.
    Blackman, D.G.H., Smith, J.M.J.B.: The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. Idaho National Laboratory Battelle Energy Alliance Idaho Falls, ID 83415 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    CCPS: Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Investigating Chemical Process Incidents, 2nd Ed. American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Wiley, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lorenzo, D.K.: API770. A manager’s guide to reducing human errors improving human performance in the process industries. American Petroleum Institute (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amorim, K.R.V.N.: A Percepção do Estresse dos Trabalhadores em uma Indústria de Revestimentos Cerâmicos do Nordeste: um Estudo de Caso. Master Degree Thesis at Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watson, W.T.: Building a culture of health and well – being. London (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lipp, M.E.N.: Mecanismos neuropsicofiosiológicos do stress: teoria e aplicações clínicas. 3rd Ed, 227 p. Casa do Psicólogo, São Paulo (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smeltzer, S.C., Bare, B.G.: Brunner & Suddart: Tratado de enfermagem médicocirúrgica. 9th ed, 509 p. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gonçalves, G.G.: Influência do Estresse: Estudo de Caso Aplicado a Grupos de Estudantes de Engenharia na Escola Politécnica. Master Degree Thesis at Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gonçalves, G.G., Nunes, K.R.V., da Silva, R.C.G., Ávila Filho S., Magalhães, R.: Protocol to evaluate the influence of stress on the task involving human types, behavior and health: an exercise proposal. In: Proceedings of European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL), Zurich (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silva, R.C.G.: Análise do estresse em mergulhadores profissionais, categoria mergulho profundo. Master degree thesis at Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ávila Filho, S.: Dependent layer of operation decision analyzes (LODA) to calculate human factor, a simulated case with PLG event. In: 7th Global Congress on Process Safety, Chicago, Illinois (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Avila, S.: LESHA – Multi-layer progressive stress & impact assessment on health & behavior. In: 9th Global Congress on Process Safety (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ávila, S.: Riscos na plataforma – Diretrizes sócio-humanas evitam acidentes e alteram padrões na produção de petróleo. Gestão de Riscos - Revista Proteção (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ávila, S., Mrugalska, B., Ahumada, C., Ávila, J.: Relationship between human-managerial and social-organizational factors for industry safeguards project: dynamic Bayesian Networks. In: 22nd Annual International Symposium Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center. College Station, Texas (2019)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ashrafi, M., Zadeh, S.A.: Lifecycle risk assessment of a technological system using dynamic Bayesian networks. Qual. Reliab. Eng. J. 33, 2497–2520 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boring, R.L., Gertman, D.I., Ulrich, T.A.: Human reliability research needs for long-duration spaceflight. In: 10th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE) and the Affiliated Conferences, Las Vegas. Conference Proceedings; International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polytechnic Institute, Industrial Engineering ProgramFederal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil
  2. 2.Idaho FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations