Advertisement

Online Feedback Control for Driver-Vehicle Interaction in Automated Driving

  • Khazar Dargahi NobariEmail author
  • Franz Albers
  • Katharina Bartsch
  • Torsten Bertram
Conference paper
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1212)

Abstract

Driver assistance systems have been in use for a decade and the automated vehicles are expected to hit the market soon. Collaboration between drivers and assistance systems, especially in SAE Level 3 of driving automation, plays a significant role as it is directly related to driving safety and the acceptance of automated vehicles. This contribution proposes driver state feedback control as a possible method for taking the driver state into account in driver-vehicle interaction. The feedback control creates a loop in which the takeover request affects the driver state and the driver state adjusts the takeover request. The functionality of the proposed interaction method is examined in an exemplary experiment on a driving simulator with twenty participants in which the gaze direction of drivers acts as a sensory state. The results indicate an improvement in the performance of drivers during the takeover situation by involving driver state in the design of the takeover request.

Keywords

Takeover request Driver state Driver-vehicle-interface Selective attention Workload Human factors 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present work is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure as result of the research project “Moffa – Holistic model to describe the allocation and the transfer of tasks between the human driver and advanced driver assistance systems during automated and interconnected driving” [grant number 16AVF2005A].

References

  1. 1.
    Yoon, S.H., Kim, Y.W., Ji, Y.G.: The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 123, 150–158 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roche, F., Somieski, A., Brandenburg, S.: Behavioral changes to repeated takeovers in highly automated driving: effects of the takeover request design and the non-driving related task modality. Hum. Factors 61(5), 839–849 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bazilinskyy, P., Petermeijer, S.M., Petrovych, V., Dodou, D., de Winter, J.C.: Takeover requests in highly automated driving: a crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 56, 82–98 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hecht, T., Feldhuetter, A., Radlmayer, J., Nakano, Y., Miki, Y., Henle, C., Bengler, K.: A review of driver state monitoring systems in the context of automated driving. In: Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, pp. 398–408. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De La Fuente, H.L., Berthelon, C., Fort, A., Etienne, V., De Weser, M., Ambeck, J., Jallais, C.: Electrophysiological and performance variations following driving events involving an increase in mental workload. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 11(1), 42 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lapoehn, S., Dziennus, M., Utesch, F., Kelsch, J., Schieben, A., Dotzauer, M., Hesse, T., Köster, F.: Interaction design for nomadic devices in highly automated vehicles. In: Weyers, B., Dittmar, A. (eds.) Human and Computer 2016 – Workshop volume (in German), pp. 1–8. German Informatics Society, Aachen (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., Krems, J., Keinath, A.: Tell them how they did: feedback on operator performance helps calibrate perceived ease of use in automated driving. Multimodal Technol. Interac. 3(2), 29 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marberger, C., Mielenz, H., Naujoks, F., Radlmayr, J., Bengler, K., Wandtner, B.: Understanding and applying the concept of “driver availability” in automated driving. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 595–605. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, J., Wu, J., Li, Y.: The driving safety field based on driver-vehicle-road interaction. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16(4), 2203–2214 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Althoff, M., Stursberg, O., Buss, M.: Safety assessment of driving behavior in multi-lane traffic for autonomous vehicles. In: 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 893–900. IEEE Press (2009) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tobii Pro Glasses 2 Wearable Eye-Tracker (2020). https://www.tobiipro.com/product-listing/tobii-pro-glasses-2

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khazar Dargahi Nobari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Franz Albers
    • 1
  • Katharina Bartsch
    • 1
  • Torsten Bertram
    • 1
  1. 1.TU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations