Advertisement

Effect of Intercity Train Vehicle Layout on Boarding and Alighting

  • Chen Wang
  • Weining FangEmail author
  • Yueyuan Chen
  • Caifeng Li
Conference paper
  • 18 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1212)

Abstract

To achieve the operational objectives of intercity trains, in particular, reducing the station dwell time, it is necessary to improve the boarding and alighting efficiency. The vehicle layout considerably influences the boarding and alighting efficiency. In this paper, a method to simulate pedestrian dynamics is proposed. The effects of three layout factors on the efficiency are investigated; furthermore, the regression curves of different factors and cumulative high density maps are considered for analysis. The results show that when the door width ranges from 800–1900 mm, the relationship between this width and the boarding and alighting efficiency is a quadratic function. When the hall width ranges from 1300–2100 mm, the relationship between this width and the efficiency is a power function. When the aisle width ranges from 650–950 mm, the relationship between this width and the efficiency is a cubic function.

Keywords

Intercity train Vehicle layout Boarding and alighting efficiency Pedestrian simulation 

References

  1. 1.
    Rüger, B., Tuna, D.: Optimizing railway vehicles in order to reducing passenger change over time. J. XIII naučno-stručna konferencija o železnici. 9(10), 25–28 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris, N.G., Graham, D.J., Anderson, R.J., Li, H.: The impact of urban rail boarding and alighting factors. In: Transportation Research Boarding Meeting, London, pp. 1–13 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujiyama, T., Thoreau, R., Tyler, N.: The effects of the design factors of the train-platform interface on pedestrian flow rates, pp. 9–95. Springer International Publishing (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jungtai, K., Moo, S.K., Jae, S.H., Yong, H.C., Taesik, K.: An analysis of boarding and alighting times for urban railway vehicles. J. Korean 17(3), 210–215 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thoreau, R., Holloway, C., Bansal, G.: Train design features affecting boarding and alighting of passengers: Train design affecting boarding and alighting. J. Adv. Transp. 50(8), 1–10 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qiu, H., Fang, W.: Train vehicle structure design from the perspective of evacuation. J. Chin. Mech. Eng. 32(1), 88–100 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qiu, H., Fang, W.: Effect of high-speed train interior space on passenger evacuation using simulation methods. J. Phys. A. 528, 378–392 (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, D., Zhao, B., Li, L.: Investigation and analysis of pedestrian characteristic parameters at Beijing South Railway Station. J. Architectural Sci. 27(5), 61–66 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buchmueller, S., Weidmann, U., Nash, A.: Development of a dwell time calculation model for timetable planning. WIT Trans.State Art Sci. Eng. 1, 105–114 (2010). G. Version 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen Wang
    • 1
  • Weining Fang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yueyuan Chen
    • 1
  • Caifeng Li
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and SafetyBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Shanghai Jiues Information Technology Co., LtdShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations