Advertisement

Design and Development of Industrial Cyber-Physical System Testbed

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1196)

Abstract

Cyber-physical systems (CPS) are integral components of Industry 4.0. However, there is a lack of benchmark systems for the design, development and testing of CPS. To this end, this article presents the design and development of an industrial CPS testbed using a stand of two coupled tanks, a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC), and an Internet-of-Things (IoT) gateway. The testbed can connect to cloud services, combining the industrial and management components together, where a cloud-based service can be used to manage the system. It also can be used to design, develop and evaluate fault diagnosis, fault-tolerant control, and cyber-security algorithms for CPS. Due to its versatility and reconfigurability, the proposed testbed can be used to test various scenarios of possible faults and cyber-attacks in industrial systems.

Keywords

Cyber-physical system Cloud-based control Fault diagnosis Fault-tolerant system Cyber-security 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Prof. Andrew Ordys acknowledges support from National Agency of Academic Exchange (NAWA), “Polish Returns” grant No: PPN/PPO/2018/1/00063/U/00001.

References

  1. 1.
    Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The Internet of Things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maple, C.: Security and privacy in the Internet of Things. J. Cyber Policy 2(2), 155–184 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2017.1366536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Almada-Lobo, F.: The industry 4.0 revolution and the future of manufacturing execution systems (MES). J. Innov. Manage. 3(4), 16–21 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marinescu, D.: Cloud Computing. Elsevier (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buyya, R., Dastjerd, A.V.: Internet of Things, Principles and Paradigms. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stenerson, J., Deeg, D.: Siemens Step 7 (TIA Portal) Programming, a Practical Approach. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monostori, L.: Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges. In: Proceedings of the 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.115
  8. 8.
    Goldschmidt, T., Murugaiah, M.K., Sonntag, C., Schlich, B., Biallas, S., Weber, P.: Cloud-based control: a multi-tenant, horizontally scalable soft-PLC. In: 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, New York, NY, pp. 909–916 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2015.124
  9. 9.
    Schlechtendahl, J., Kretschmer, F., Sang, Z., Lechler, A., Xu, X.: Extended study of network capability for cloud based control systems. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 43, 89–95 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.10.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farokhi, F., Shames, I., Batterham, N.: Secure and private cloud-based control using semi-homomorphic encryption. IFAC PapersOnLine 49(22), 163–168 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Junsoo, K., Lee, C., Shim, H., Cheon, J.H., Kim, A., Kim, M., Song, Y.: Encrypting controller using fully homomorphic encryption for security of cyber-physical systems. IFAC PapersOnLine 49(22), 175–180 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Costa, B., Skrjanc, I., Blazic, S., Angelov, P.: A practical implementation of self-evolving cloud-based control of a pilot plant. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCO), pp. 7–12 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBConf.2013.6617464
  13. 13.
    Ordys, A.W., Uduehi, D., Johnson, M.: Process control performance assessment, from theory to implementation. In: Monograph Series: Advances in Industrial Control. Springer Verlag, London (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-624-7
  14. 14.
    Ordys, A., Grimble, M.J.: Benchmarking and tuning PID controllers. In: Vilanova, R., Visioli, A. (eds.) PID Control in the New Millennium: Lessons Learned and New Approaches, Springer Verlag (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2425-2_13
  15. 15.
    Krasniqi, X., Hajrizi, E.: Use of IoT technology to drive the automotive industry from connected to full autonomous vehicles. IFAC PapersOnLine 49(29), 269–274 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruiz Garcia, M.A., Rojas, R., Gualtieri, L., Rauch, E., Matt, D.: A human-in-the-loop cyber-physical system for collaborative assembly in smart manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 81, 600–605 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patel, A.R., Patel, R.S., Singh, N.M., Kazi, F.S.: Vitality of robotics in healthcare industry: an Internet of Things (IoT) perspective. In: Bhatt, C., Dey, N., Ashour, A. (eds.) Internet of Things and Big Data Technologies for Next Generation Healthcare, Studies in Big Data, vol. 23, pp. 91–109. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49736-5_5
  18. 18.
    Satuyeva, B., Sauranbayev, C., Ukaegbu I.A., Nunna, H.S.V.S.K.: Energy 4.0: towards IoT applications in Kazakhstan. Procedia Comput. Sci. 151, 909-915 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.126
  19. 19.
    Mocrii, D., Chen, Y., Musilek, P.: IoT-based smart homes: a review of system architecture software, communications, privacy and security. Internet of Things 1–2, 81–98 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2018.08.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Al-Jarrah, O.Y., Maple, C., Dianati, M., Oxtoby, D., Mouzakitis, A.: Intrusion detection systems for intra-vehicle networks: a review. IEEE Access 7, 21266–21289 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2894183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Automatic Control and RoboticsWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Warwick Manufacturing GroupThe University of WarwickCoventryU.K.

Personalised recommendations