Development and Modelling of a Laboratory Ball on Plate Process

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1196)


This work is concerned with a laboratory ball on plate process developed in the Institute of Control and Computation Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology. Process development, modelling and model simplification are discussed. Although the rudimentary fundamental model of the process is nonlinear, it is shown that very good modelling accuracy is achieved when a simplified linear model is used. Results of laboratory experiments are given to show the effectiveness of the model.


Ball on plate process Modelling Model simplification Model validation 


  1. 1.
    Amadi-Echendu, J.E., Higham, E.H.: Curriculum development and training in process measurements and control engineering. Eng. Sci. Educ. J. 6, 104–108 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Çatalbaç, B., Uyanık, İ.: A low-cost laboratory experiment setup for frequency domain analysis for a feedback control systsms course. IFAC PapersOnLine 50(1), 15704–15709 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Czerwiński, K., Wojtulewicz, A., Ławryńczuk, M.: Fuzzy controller for laboratory levitation system: real-time experiments using programmable logic controller. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 17, 1507–1514 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Kassem, A., Haddad, H., Albitar, C.: Commparison between different methods of control of ball and plate system with 6DOF Stewart platform. IFAC PapersOnLine 48, 47–52 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kheir, N.A., Åström, K.J., Auslander, D., Cheok, K.C., Frankiln, G.F., Masten, M., Rabins, M.: Control systems education. Automatica 32, 147–166 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leyko, J.: Mechanics. PWN Scientific Publishing House, Warsaw (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leva, A.: A simple and flexible experimental laboratory for automatic control courses. Control Eng. Pract. 14, 167–176 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McLoone, S.C., Maloco, J.: A cost-effective hardware-based laboratory solution for demonstrating PID control. In: Proceedings of the UKACC 11th International Conference on Control (CONTROL), Belfast, UK, pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Piłat, A., Turnau, A.: Neural adapted controller learned on-line in real-time. IFAC Proc. Volumes 42, 47–52 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Stander, D., Jiménez-Leudo, S., Quijano, N.: Low-cost “ball and plate” design and implementation for learning control systems. In: 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC), Cartagena, Colombia, pp. 1–6 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tatjewski, P.: Advanced Control of Industrial Processes. Structures and Algorithms. Springer, London (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wojtulewicz, A., Chaber, P., Ławryńczuk, M.: Multiple-input multiple-output laboratory stand for process control education. In: Proceedings of the 21th IEEE International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics MMAR 2016, Międzyzdroje, Poland, pp. 466–471 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zeeshan, A., Nauman, N., Jawad Khan, M.: Design, control and implementation of a ball on plate balancing system. In: The 9th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences Technology (IBCAST), Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 22–26 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Control and Computation EngineeringWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations