Comparison of Robustness of Selected Speed Control Systems Applied for Two Mass System with Backlash

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1196)


The article compares robustness of five selected speed control systems to the changes in the controlled plant, which is a two mass system with backlash introduced between the motor and the linking shaft. Authors propose a test procedure which will take into account typical dynamical and steady states occurring in electrical drives. Moreover, modified quality indicators also are proposed in order to measure the influence of varying object parameter to the control process. During the research, authors changed the moment of inertia of the motor and the load as well as the backlash width. The results are summarized in tables in order to enable clear comparison between investigated methods.


Two-mass system Backlash ADRC 2DOF-PID Torsional vibration Damping ISE FFT Spectrum 


  1. 1.
    Wicher, B.: Model of ADRC speed control system for complex mechanical object with backlash. In: 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in automation and Robotics, 28–31 August 2017, Miedzyzdroje, Poland (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wicher, B., Brock, S.: Active disturbance rejection control based load side speed controller for two mass system with backlash. In: 2018 IEEE 18th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC), 26–30 August. Budapest, Hungary (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nordin, M., Gutman, P.-O.: Controlling mechanical systems with backlash—a survey. Automatica 38(10), 1633–1649 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao, Z., Zhao, S.: An active disturbance rejection based approach to vibration suppression in two-inertia systems. In: American Control Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muszynski, R., Deskur, J.: Damping of torsional vibrations in high-dynamic industrial drives. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 57(2), 544–552 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Szabat, K., Orlowska–Kowalska, T.: Vibration suppression in a two-mass drive system using pi speed controller and additional feedbacks—comparative study. IEEE Trans. Indust. Electron. 54(2), 1193–1206 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han, J.: From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 56(3), 900–906 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gao, Z.: Scaling and bandwidth patametrization based controller tuning. In: American Control Conference, Denver, Colorado (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Poznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations