Advertisement

The Novel Approach to the Tuning of the Reduced-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for Second-Order Processes

Conference paper
  • 370 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1196)

Abstract

In this paper, the novel approach to the tuning of the Reduced-order Active Disturbance Rejection Controller (RADRC) for the second-order processes is presented. In particular, this work shows that the independent use of five RADRC tuning parameters potentially provides the improvement in the control performance without any deterioration of the quality of the manipulated signal. The concept is based on the zero-pole cancellation technique assuming the second-order model of the process. Then, after theoretical analysis, the conclusions of the practical significance are drawn, and the tuning method is suggested. The theoretical considerations are confirmed by the validation based on the nonlinear laboratory pneumatic system. The validation stage consists of both simulation and experimental tests. The results show an improvement in robustness and a control quality compared to the conventional ADRC controller tuned using by the conventional method and to the conventional PID controller.

Keywords

Reduced-order Active Disturbance Rejection Controller (RADRC) Second-order process Tuning rules Practical verification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Paweł Nowak and Jacek Czeczot were financed by the grant from the Silesian University of Technology - subsidy for maintaining and developing the research potential in 2020. Patryk Grelewicz was financed by the European Union through the European Social Fund (grant POWR.03.02.00-00-I029).

References

  1. 1.
    Han, J.: From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 56(3), 900–906 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.2011621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao, Z.: Active disturbance rejection control: a paradigm shift in feedback control system design. In: American Control Conference, pp. 2399–2405 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1109/acc.2006.1656579
  3. 3.
    Huang, Y., Xue, W.: Active disturbance rejection control: methodology and theoretical analysis. ISA Trans. 53(4), 963–976 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2014.03.003MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xingling, S., Honglun, W.: Back-stepping active disturbance rejection control design for integrated missile guidance and control system via reduced-order ESO. ISA Trans. 57, 10–22 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao, Z.: Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning. In: Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, pp. 4989–4996 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2003.1242516
  6. 6.
    Zheng, Q., Gao, L.Q., Gao, Z.: On estimation of plant dynamics and disturbance from input-output data in real time. In: IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, pp. 1167–1172 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1109/cca.2007.4389393
  7. 7.
    Chen, X., Li, D., Gao, Z., Wang, C.: Tuning method for second-order active disturbance rejection control. In: Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control Conference, pp. 6322–6327 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fratczak, M., Nowak, P., Klopot, T., Czeczot, J., Bysko, S., Opilski, B.: Virtual commissioning for the control of the continuous industrial processes; case study. In: 20th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), pp. 1032–1037 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/mmar.2015.7284021
  9. 9.
    Nowak, P., Czeczot, J.: Practical verification of active disturbance rejection controller for the pneumatic setup. In: 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), pp. 19–24 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/mmar.2017.8046791

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Silesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations