Advertisement

AHP for a Comparative Study of Tools Used for Programming Learning

  • Mónica Gómez RiosEmail author
  • Doris Juliana Castillo Herrera
  • Karla Stefania Narváez Lucio
  • Maikel Yelandi Leyva Vazquez
Conference paper
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1211)

Abstract

Programming learning has become a fundamental tool for entering the world of work. The problem is that its learning is not simple and requires practice and perseverance. The objective is to find tools that have been used to support the student in programming learning. As features, the platforms were reviewed, the most used being the web and mobile platforms. On the other hand, the type of learning, predominant is learning by gamification, followed by learning by doing and visual learning. Based on this, the AHP method has been used to evaluate the tool and the choice of the most appropriate one, taking into account relevant criteria in an application such as accessibility, easy to use, innovative, understanding and interaction. As a result, Program Wars proved to be the most suitable for programming learning.

Keywords

AHP Programming learning Virtual reality Augmented reality Type of learning Technology platforms 

References

  1. 1.
    Chandramouli, M., Heffron, J.: A desktop VR-based HCI framework for programming instruction. In: 2015 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, pp. 129–134 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad A: Mobile learning application for enhancement of teaching tool in Java programming. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Appl. 11Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shellington, W.A., Humphries, T.O., Morsi, R., Rizvi, M.A.E.: Syntax circuitry: a mobile game for practicing programming language syntax. In: 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference FIE, pp. 1–4 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khaleel, F.L., Ashaari, N.S., Meriam, T.S., Wook, T., Ismail, A.: The study of gamification application architecture for a programming language course, New York, NY, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gavrilovic, N., Jovanovic, S.: Implementing ITS intelligent tutoring systems for java programming e-learning, pp. 24–25 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jordaan, D.B.: Board games in the computer science class to improve students’ knowledge of the Python programming language. In: 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications ICONIC, pp. 1–5 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muyan-Ozccelik, P.: A hands-on cross-platform mobile programming approach to teaching OOP concepts and design patterns, pp. 33–39. IEEE Press, Buenos Aires (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalelioğlu, F.: A new way of teaching programming skills to K-12 students: Code.org. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 200–210 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ortega, M., Redondo, M.A., Molina, A.I., Bravo, C., Lacave, C., Arroyo, Y., Sanchez, S., Garcia, M., Collazos, C.A., Toledo, J.J.: IProg: development of immersive systems for the learning of programming, Cancun, Mexico, New York, NY, USA (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khaloo, P., Maghoumi, M., Taranta, E., Bettner, D., Laviola, J.: Code park: a new 3D code visualization tool. In: 2017 IEEE Working Conference on Software Visualization VISSOFT, pp. 43–53. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Tahat, K., Taha, N., Hasan, B., Shawar, B.A.: The impact of a 3D visual tool on female students’ attitude and performance in computer programming. In: 2016 SAI Computing Conference SAI, pp. 864–867 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gomez Rios, M.D., Paredes Velasco, M.: Augmented reality as a methodology to the development of learning in programming, pp. 327–340. Springer International Publishing (2019)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boonbrahm, S., Boonbrahm, P., Kaewrat, C., Pengkaew, P., Khachorncharoenkul, P.: Teaching fundamental programming using augmented reality. Int. J. Interact. Mobile Technol. 13, 31–43 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anvik, J., Cote, V., Riehl, J.: Program wars: a card game for learning programming and cybersecurity concepts, New York, NY, USA, pp. 393–399 (2019)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manso, A., Marques, C.G., Santos, P.: Algorithmic: software system to support the learning of programming. In: 2018 International Symposium on Computers in Education SIIE, pp. 1–6 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barr, V., Trytten, D.: Using turing’s craft codelab to support CS1 students as they learn to program. ACM Inroads 7, 67–75 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feijoo, P.G., De la Rosa, F.: RoBlock: programming learning with mobile robotics. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, p. 361 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wyeld, T., Nakayama, M.: Visualising the code-in-action helps students learn programming skills. In: 2018 22nd International Conference Information Visualisation IV, pp. 182–187 (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quinson, M., Oster, G.: A teaching system to learn programming: the programmer’s learning machine, pp. 260–265 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Appleton, J.: Introducing intelligent exercises to support web application programming students (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hundt, C., Schlarb, M., Schmidt, B.: SAUCE: a web application for interactive teaching and learning of parallel programming. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 105, 163–173 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pantoja, M.: Designing a new video game app as an aid for introduction to programming classes that use C programming language, pp. 10–16 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Broll, B., Ledeczi, A., Volgyesi, P., Sallai, J., Maroti, M., Carrillo, A., Weeden-Wright, S.L., Vanags, C., Swartz, J.D., Lu, M.: A visual programming environment for learning distributed programming, Seattle, Washington, USA, New York, NY, USA, pp. 81–86 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yaraghi, N., Tabesh, P., Guan, P., Zhuang, J.: Comparison of AHP and Monte Carlo AHP under different levels of uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 62, 122–132 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mónica Gómez Rios
    • 1
    Email author
  • Doris Juliana Castillo Herrera
    • 1
  • Karla Stefania Narváez Lucio
    • 1
  • Maikel Yelandi Leyva Vazquez
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversidad Politécnica SalesianaGuayaquilEcuador

Personalised recommendations