A Unified Framework for Human Centered Design of a Substance Use, Abuse, and Recovery Support System
- 16 Downloads
This research explores the analysis, design, and testing of a software application to support opioid peer specialists working to assist substance users, abusers, those in recovery, and their families. The paper presents a framework integrating best practice approaches from Design Science Research, Community Based Participatory Research, and human centered and user experience design principles for the purpose of: 1) guiding community based, goal-directed software design, and 2) building and evaluating a substance use, abuse, and recovery software application. Focus group findings from 33 participants suggest that using the framework enables alignment between human centered system requirements; personal, family, and community-based program goal achievement; and local/state population health directives. End user feedback indicates that the software application design addresses specific human interaction needs for the complex high-stakes context of opioid use, abuse, and recovery.
KeywordsHuman factors Human-centered design Design science Community based participatory research Substance abuse eHealth Health informatics
This project is funded through a Community Health Scholars Grant from UAB. The UAB Center for the Study of Community Health (CSCH), one of 26 Prevention Research Centers (PRCs) designated nationally by CDC, is an initiative to encourage community-based participatory research (CBPR) by UAB faculty. Additional funding is provided through AL State Medicaid.
- 2.https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics. Accessed 6 July 2019. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2017-nsduh-annual-national-report. Accessed 6 Aug 2019
- 3.https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/opioids/index.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2018
- 6.Gullo, S., Galavotti, C., Kuhlmann, A.S., Msiska, T., Hastings, P., Marti, C.N.: Effects of a social accountability approach, CARE’s Community Score Card, on reproductive health-related outcomes in Malawi: a cluster-randomized controlled evaluation. PLoS ONE 12(2), e0171316 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Sudhinaraset, M., Afulani, P., Diamond-Smith, N., Bhattacharyya, S., Donnay, F., Montagu, D.: Advancing a conceptual model to improve maternal health quality: the person-centered care framework for reproductive health equity. Gates Open Res. 1, 1–14 (2017)Google Scholar
- 10.Tembo, F.: Rethinking Social Accountability in Africa: Lessons from the Mwananchi Programme. Overseas Development Institute, London (2013)Google Scholar
- 14.http://www.kellogghealthscholars.org/about/community.php. Accessed 7 June 2019
- 16.Burns, J., Cooke, D., Schweidler, C.: A short guide to community based participatory action research. Advancement Project – Healthy City Community Research Lab, December 2011. https://hc-v6-static.s3.amazonaws.com/media/resources/tmp/cbpar.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2019
- 17.Adikari, S., Mcdonald, C., Campbell, J.: Little design up-front: a design science approach to integrating usability into agile requirements engineering. In: Book Little Design up-Front: A Design Science Approach to Integrating Usability into Agile Requirements Engineering, pp. 549–558. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
- 18.Adikari, S., Mcdonald, C., Lynch, N.: Design science-oriented usability modelling for software requirements. In: Book Design Science Oriented Usability Modelling for Software Requirements, pp. 373–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
- 19.Tuunanen, T., Peffers, K., Gengler, C.E.: Wide Audience Requirements Engineering (Ware): A Practical Method and Case Study (2004)Google Scholar