Advertisement

Data Analysis of Readiness Programs of Machine-Building Enterprises

  • Bohdan HaidabrusEmail author
  • Serhiy Protsenko
  • Philipp Rosenberger
  • Janis Grabis
Conference paper
  • 101 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

One of the important aspects of providing the high level of the enterprises IT-readiness at machine-building enterprises is using the data science approach. By using data analysis, we mean the ability of the enterprises’ experts to increase using data by the most effective appliance of modern data science algorithms. In our research, the analysis has been carried out and the proposed approach can be used in real practice to evaluate the implementation of program projects to boost IT readiness. For example, at the initial stage, when the project is just starting and we do not know the real values of features, we can assign to modifications the average value for each, and then when the project arrives the real value of modification, we can calculate the target and track the dynamics of the assessment, the quality of the program projects to boost IT-readiness of machine-building enterprises. Thus, an important question is the compliance of the enterprise to the necessary level of IT-readiness which is directly connected with data analysis.

Keywords

Data science Project management IT-readiness Program management Machine learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Akintoye, A.S., MacLeod, M.J.: Risk analysis and management in construction. Int. J. Project Manage. 15(1), 31–38 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Labuschagne, C., Brent, A.C.: Sustainable project life cycle management: the need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector. Int. J. Project Manage. 23(2), 159–168 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller, R., Lessard, D.: Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 19(8), 437–443 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tick, J., Kovács, Z.: P-graph based workflow synthesis. In: 12th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems - Proceedings, INES, 4481303, pp. 249–253 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, X.: Win-win concession period determination methodology. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 135, 550–558 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chenarani, A., Druzhinin, E.A., Kritskiy, D.N.: Simulating the impact of activity uncertainties and risk combinations in R&D projects. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 10(4), 1–9 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiyko, S.G., Druzhinin, E.A., Koba, S.A., Haidabrus, B.V.: A mathematical background for information technology of project’s processes integration taking into account risk factors. J. Metall. Min. Ind. 6(3), 66–77 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nilsson, L., Elg, M., Bergman, B.: Managing ideas for the development of new products. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 24(5–6), 498–513 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lanstrand, J., Elg, M.: Non-human resistance in changes towards lean. J. Organ. Change Manag. 25(6), 853–866 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bushuyev, S., Friedrich Wagner, R.: IPMA Delta and IPMA Organisational Competence Baseline (OCB): new approaches in the field of project management maturity. Int. J. Manag. Projects Bus. 7(2), 302–310 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chandra, C., Grabis, J.: Configurable supply chain: framework, methodology and application. Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 17(1–2), 5–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chandra, C., Grabis, J.: Information technology support for integrated supply chain modeling. J. Hum. Syst. Manag. 27(1), 3–13 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bushuyev, S.D., Bushuyev, D.A., Rogozina, V.B., Mikhieieva, O.V.: Convergence of knowledge in project management. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications, IDAACS, vol. 2 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, A., Koyejo, O., Pillow, J.: Dependent relevance determination for smooth and structured sparse regression. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20(89), 1–43 (2019)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tick, J.: Business Process based initial modeling at software development. In: SAMI - IEEE 11th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics, Proceedings, 6480962, pp. 141–144 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu, T., Sun, J., Bi, J.: Longitudinal LASSO: jointly learning features and temporal contingency for outcome prediction. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drugowitsch, J.: Variational Bayesian inference for linear and logistic regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.5438. arxiv.org (2013)
  18. 18.
    Piironen, J., Aki Vehtari, A.: Projection predictive model selection for Gaussian processes. In: IEEE 26th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rivera, R., Burnaev, E.: Forecasting of commercial sales with large scale Gaussian Processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05548, adsabs.harvard.edu (2017)
  20. 20.
    Kritsky, D.N., Druzhinin, E.A., Pogudina, O.K., Kritskaya, O.S.: Decision making by the analysis of project risks based on the FMEA method. In: IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, CSIT 2018-Proceedings, pp. 187–190 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bohdan Haidabrus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Serhiy Protsenko
    • 1
  • Philipp Rosenberger
    • 2
  • Janis Grabis
    • 3
  1. 1.Sumy State UniversitySumyUkraine
  2. 2.University of Applied SciencesViennaAustria
  3. 3.Riga Technical UniversityRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations