Advertisement

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Energy: Identifying the Key Dimensions from Two Different Bibliometric Analyzes

  • Giovanna Andrea Pinilla-De La CruzEmail author
  • Rodrigo Rabetino
  • Jussi Kantola
Conference paper
  • 6 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1209)

Abstract

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been considered as one of the primary mechanisms to mobilize social capital towards infrastructure and services in the energy sector on a global scale. However, the lack of understanding of PPPs in the energy sector has been highlighted as a limiting factor for the full and successful implementation of PPP projects. Accordingly, this research seeks to identify the main dimensions of PPPs in the energy sector. A systematic search was conducted for that purpose. Furthermore, the present study included the application of two different bibliometric packages as analytics tools: VOSviewer and Leximancer. Both different computational approaches were used to identify key dimensions and compare them with results of manual content analysis. The five key dimensions emerged as 1) PPP projects, 2) renewable technologies and electricity in the energy sector, 3) hybrid energy governance, 4) risk and 5) sectoral interlinkages. The development of innovative approaches related to hybrid energy governance and the growing sectoral interlinkages reveals the need for more flexible and participatory PPPs to facilitate the energy transition.

Keywords

Public-private partnerships PPPs Energy Key dimensions VOSviewer Leximancer Projects Risk Governance Electricity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from Evald and Hilda Nissin Foundation and VEBIC – Vaasa Energy Business Innovation Centre and the University of Vaasa.

References

  1. 1.
    Wu, Y., Li, L., Xu, R., Chen, K., Hu, Y., Lin, X.: Risk assessment in straw-based power generation public-private partnership projects in China: a fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 161, 977–990 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Bank. Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) project database. https://ppi.worldbank.org
  3. 3.
    Cruz, C.O., Sarmento, J.M.: Reforming traditional PPP models to cope with the challenges of smart cities. Compet. Regul. Netw. Ind. 18(1–2), 94–114 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heldeweg, M.A., Sanders, M., Harmsen, M.: Public-private or private-private energy partnerships? Toward good energy governance in regional and local green gas projects. Energy Sustain. Soc. 5(9), 1–12 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer, pp. 1–5. arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.2058 (2011)
  6. 6.
    Leximancer: Leximancer User Guide: Release 4.5 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Naukkarinen, O., Bragge, J.: Aesthetics in the age of digital humanities. J. Aesthetics Cult. 8, 1–18 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Liddo, G., Rubino, A., Somma, E.: Determinants of PPP in infrastructure investments in MENA countries: a focus on energy. J. Ind. Bus. Econ. 46(4), 523–580 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ari, I., Koc, M.: Sustainable financing for sustainable development: agent-based modeling of alternative financing models for clean energy investments. Sustainability 11(1967), 1–34 (2019)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    He, G.: Financing the last mile of electricity-for-all programs: experiences from China. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 8(1), 51–58 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Carvalho, L.: Rethinking the continuum between public and private actors in electricity policy in the context of the UK energy transition. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociol. Rev. 54(6), 881–906 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grotenbreg, S., Van Buuren, A.: Facilitation as a governance strategy: unravelling governments’ facilitation frames. Sustainability 9(1), 160, 1–18 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu, Y., Chan, A.P., Xia, B., Qian, Q.K., Liu, Y., Peng, Y.: Critical risk factors affecting the implementation of PPP waste-to-energy projects in China. Appl. Energy 158, 403–411 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, J., Wei, Q.: Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure public- private partnership projects in China using fuzzy TOPSIS. J. Clean. Prod. 189, 211–222 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, K., Ke, Y.: Public-private partnerships in the electric vehicle charging infrastructure in China: an illustrative case study. Adv. Civil Eng. 2018, 1–10 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanna Andrea Pinilla-De La Cruz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rodrigo Rabetino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jussi Kantola
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.VEBICUniversity of VaasaVaasaFinland
  2. 2.School of ManagementUniversity of VaasaVaasaFinland
  3. 3.School of Technology and InnovationsUniversity of VaasaVaasaFinland
  4. 4.University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations