Creating a Physical Bridge Between Management and Leadership as a Strategy to Improve Organization Performance Analysis

  • Domininc M. Ramere
  • Opeyeolu Timothy LaseindeEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1209)


Managers are defined by their roles, responsibilities and characteristics aligned with the business goals and objective. In this, regard, the performance of the Organization, largely depend on the quality of management and leadership activities. In many cases, lack of managerial experience, incompetency, lack of leadership skills and inappropriate work experience are the major contributory factor to organizational and business failures. From studies, a major challenge within organizations is associated with restricted channels for innovation in decision-making and process optimization for managers. High emphasis on following the standardized processes, and procedures is another identified challenge. The gap between management and leadership strategies is often phenomenal. Most of the managers use the management functions of controlling, organizing, planning and directing for the applications of principles in connecting resources effectively and achieving the organizational goal without using their own personal strategies. Managers’ are generally trained to follow the policies, processes and procedures handed by their seniors whereas; leaders are there to create solutions to problems encountered in the organization on continuous basis. It is important for managers to equip themselves with both leadership and management skills, in order to be multi-facetted on problem solving without following the standardized processes and procedures. The controlling, planning, organizing and directing role of managers will be highly effective when it is merged with the leadership skills and roles in achieving objectives of that policy. It requires the art of leadership skills to motivate employees towards achieving the common goal set by the organization. Under the inadequate management systems, the members of the organization would pursue their own daily agenda which results in resource and time misuse, causing various failure loops in an organization. The research reviews methods applied in different instances and it communicates the inferences identified based on obvious patterns and correlations that have effectively worked for organizations burdened with similar challenges.


Management Leadership Performance analysis Organization Planning Problem solving Material Management role 


  1. 1.
    Stokes, D., Wilson, N., Wilson, N.: Small Business Management and Entrepreneurship. Cengage Learning EMEA, Andover (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nel, W.: Management for Engineers. Technologists and Scientists. Juta and Company Ltd., Cape Town (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooney, R.: Empowered self-management and the design of work teams. Pers. Rev. 33(6), 677–692 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nienaber, H.: Conceptualisation of management and leadership. Manag. Decis. 48(5), 661–675 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kraines, G.A.: Accountability Leadership: How to Strengthen Productivity Through Sound Managerial Leadership. Career Press (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeCarlo, D.: Extreme Project Management: Using Leadership, Principles, and Tools to Deliver Value in the Face of Volatility. Wiley, San Francisco (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bush, T.: From management to leadership: semantic or meaningful change? Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 36(2), 271–288 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCartney, W.W., Campbell, C.R.: Leadership, management, and derailment. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 27(3), 190–202 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lim, E., Boger, E.P.: Management requires leadership. Consortium J. Hospitality Tour. 9(1), 59–66 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mcgowan, P., Miller, J.: Management vs. leadership. Sch. Adm. 58(10), 32–34 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mujtaba, B.G.: Managerial Skills and Practices for Global Leadership. ILEAD Academy, Davie (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Connors, T.D. (ed.): The Volunteer Management Handbook: Leadership Strategies for Success, vol. 235. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yielder, J., Codling, A.: Management and leadership in the contemporary university. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 26(3), 315–328 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G.B.: Self-management and team-making in cross-functional work teams: discovering the keys to becoming an integrated team (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amanchukwu, R.N., Stanley, G.J., Ololube, N.P.: A review of leadership theories, principles and styles and their relevance to educational management. Management 5(1), 6–14 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goetsch, D.L., Davis, S.B.: Quality Management for Organizational Excellence. Pearson, Upper Saddle River (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKimm, J., Phillips, K. (eds.): Leadership and Management in Integrated Services. Learning Matters, Exeter (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nienaber, H., Roodt, G.: Management and leadership: buccaneering or science? Eur. Bus. Rev. 20(1), 36–50 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Domininc M. Ramere
    • 1
  • Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Technology, Faculty of Engineering and the Built EnvironmentUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations