Advertisement

Open Ecosystem for Smart Mobility System Operation and Maintenance

  • Jukka PulkkinenEmail author
  • Atte Partanen
  • Jari Jussila
  • Heikki Ruohomaa
Conference paper
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1209)

Abstract

In this study, we provide novel insight into operating and maintaining a heterogeneous and expanding vehicle fleet in a smart city environment. Smart mobility is booming and comprises an important part of the development of smart cities. City bikes are already widely used in many cities and new types of vehicle, such as scooters, have already entered the market. Smart mobility systems also create new infrastructure in cities that requires daily operation and maintenance. Poorly managed operation and maintenance causes low usage of smart mobility systems and on the other side, can be very costly to cities. Therefore, we provide a novel method according to Industry 4.0 standards to manage the challenges with the help of an open platform that connects smart mobility systems and service providers.

Keywords

Smart mobility Digital ecosystem Industry 4.0 Smart services 

References

  1. Acquier, A., Carbone, V., Massé, D.: How to create value(s) in the sharing economy: business models, scalability, and sustainability. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 9(2) (2019). https://timreview.ca/article/1215
  2. Benevolo, C., Dameri, R., D’Auria, B.: Smart mobility in smart city. Action taxonomy, ICT intensity and public benefits. In: Torre, T., Braccini, A., Spinelli, R. (eds.) Empowering Organizations. Enabling Platforms and Artefacts. Springer, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  3. Docherty, I., Marsden, G., Anable, J.: The governance of smart mobility. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 115, 114–125 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. Faber, A., Rehm, S.V., Hernandez-Mendez, A., Matthes, F.: Modeling and visualizing smart city mobility business ecosystems: insights from a case study. Inf. (Switzerland) 9(11) (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/info9110270
  5. Grönlund, A., Svärdsten, F., Öhman, P.: Value for money and the rule of law: the (new) performance audit in Sweden. Int. J. Public Sector Manag. 24(2), 107–121 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A.: The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(9), 2047–2059 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ji, S., Cherry, C.R., Han, L.D., Jordan, D.A.: Electric bike sharing: simulation of user demand and system availability. J. Clean. Prod. 85, 250–257 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jussila, J., Sillanpää, V., Lehtonen, T., Helander, N.: Value assessment of e-government service from municipality perspective. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)Google Scholar
  9. Lelli, F.: Interoperability of the time of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things. Future Internet 11(2) (2019).  https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11020036
  10. Letichevsky, A.A., Letychevskyi, O.O., Skobelev, V.G., Volkov, V.A.: Cyber-physical systems. Cybern. Syst. Anal. 53(6), 821–834 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loidl, M., Witzmann-Müller, U., Zagel, B.: A spatial framework for planning station-based bike sharing systems. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 11(1) (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0347-7
  12. Midwinter, A.: Developing performance indicators for local government: the Scottish experience. Public Money Manag. 14(2), 37–43 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Noura, M., Atiquzzaman, M., Gaedke, M.: Interoperability in internet of things: taxonomies and open challenges. Mob. Netw. Appl. 24(3), 796–809 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pedone, G., Mezgár, I.: Model similarity evidence and interoperability affinity in cloud-ready Industry 40 technologies. Comput. Ind. 100(May), 278–286 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Porter, M.E., Heppelmann, J.E.: How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 11, 64–98 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. Pulkkinen, J., Jussila, J., Partanen, A., Trotskii, I., Laiho, A.: Smart mobility: services, platforms and ecosystems. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 9(9), 15–24 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Senyo, P.K., Liu, K., Effah, J.: Digital business ecosystem: literature review and a framework for future research. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 47, 52–64 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sotres, P., Lanza, J., Sánchez, L., Santana, J.R., López, C., et al.: Breaking vendors and city locks through a semantic-enabled global interoperable internet-of-things system: a smart parking case. Sensors (Switzerland) 19(2) (2019).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020229
  19. Thoben, K.D., Wiesner, S.A., Wuest, T.: “Industrie 4.0” and smart manufacturing-a review of research issues and application examples. Int. J. Autom. Technol. 11(1), 4–16 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D., Zhang, C.: Implementing smart factory of Industrie 4.0: an outlook. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3159805
  21. Yin, J., Qian, L., Shen, J.: From value co-creation to value co-destruction? The case of dockless bike sharing in China. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 71, 169–185 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jukka Pulkkinen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Atte Partanen
    • 1
  • Jari Jussila
    • 1
  • Heikki Ruohomaa
    • 1
  1. 1.Häme University of Applied ScienceHämeenlinnaFinland

Personalised recommendations