Advertisement

Improvement of the Model System to Develop Eco-Friendly Bio-Utilization of Phosphogypsum

  • Yelizaveta ChernyshEmail author
  • Koichi Hasegawa
Conference paper
  • 30 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

This paper focused on the modeling of the possibility of bacteria growth under medium that different content phosphogypsum (PG) doses for environmental protection purposes with special attention to the analysis of the effect of PG features underestimation of E. coli growth. The culture of E. coli is diluted with Lysogeny broth (LB) initially without adding PG to obtain an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.05. Study is carried out by adding different doses of PG (250 mg/200 mL LB; 500 mg/200 mL LB; 1000 mg/200 mL LB). The OD600 is measured with the use of an absorption spectrophotometer. Under modeling PG feature effluence, several factors are identified that impact on bacteria growth and the general methodological approach to assessing the biochemical activity of PG is formed. The important direction for feature study the effect of PG use as a component of the medium for E. coli is the assessment of mutations and adaptive biochemical mechanisms, in particular, the possibility of biofilm formation. Microorganisms in biofilms are better adapted and much more resistant to high concentrations of various groups of xenobiotics. In some cases, the matrix itself is involved in bioremediation, sorbing and retaining toxic substances from the aqueous phase.

Keywords

Environmental protection Phosphogypsum Modeling influence E. coli Bioremediation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank Prof. Leonid Plyatsuk (Sumy State University) for reading the manuscript and helpful discussion and Takahiro Hamaguchi (Chubu University) for his technical support. This work has been supported by the fellowship program of the Matsumae International Foundation (to YC), and the research fund from Chubu University (to KH).

References

  1. 1.
    Nozhevnikova, A.N., Bochkova, E.A., Plakunov, V.K.: Multi-species biofilms in ecology, medicine and biotechnology. Mikrobiologiya 84(6), 623–644 (2015). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pystina, N.B., Listov, E.L., Balakirev, I.V., Nikishova, A.S., Lipnik, S.I.: The use of modern biotechnology in solving urgent environmental problems of the oil and gas complex. Sci. Tech. Collect. News Gas Sci. 2(13), 113–117 (2013). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corcoran, E., Nellemann, C., Baker, E., Bos, R., Osborn, D., Savelli, H. (eds.): Sick Water? The Central Role of Waste-Water Management in Sustainable Development. A Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, UN-HABITAT GRID-Arendal, Norway (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Connor, R.: The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World. UNESCO, Paris (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosander, E., Svedendahl Humble, M., Veide, A.: Municipal solid waste as carbon and energy source for escherichia coli. Adv. Recycl. Waste Manag. 1(2), 2–8 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.4172/2475-7675.1000114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khanafer, M., Al-Awadhi, H., Radwan, S.: Coliform Bacteria for Bioremediation of Waste Hydrocarbons. Hindawi BioMed Res. Int. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1838072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhi, S., Banting, G.S., Ruecker, N.J., Neumann, N.F.: Stress resistance in naturalised waste water E. coli strains. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 12(2), 42–50 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1680/jenes.16.00021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poladyan, A., Trchounian, K., Vassilian, A., Trchounian, A.: Hydrogen production by Escherichia coli using brewery waste: optimal pretreatment of waste and role of different hydrogenases. Renewable Energy 115(C), 931–936 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Owumi, S.E., Odunola, O.A., Gbadegesin, M.A., Ayoola, B., Onuchukwu, E.: Effect of electronic waste on E. coli genomic integrity: a possible role for metal induced carcinogenesis. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 96(10), 1581–1591 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2015.1029480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hermann, L., Kraus, F., Hermann, R.: Phosphorus processing – potentials for higher efficiency. Sustainability 10, 1482 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chernysh, Y., Balintova, M., Plyatsuk, L., Holub, M., Demcak, S.: The influence of phosphogypsum addition on phosphorus release in biochemical treatment of sewage sludge. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 1269–1283 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Plyatsuk, L.D., Chernysh, Y.Y., Ablieieva, I.Y., Yakhnenko, O.M., Bataltsev, E.V., Balintova, M., Hurets, L.L.: Remediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals. J. Eng. Sci. 6(1), H1–H8 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.21272/jes.2019.6(1).h1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Svjetlana, M., Vrane, J.: Characteristics and significance of microbial biofilmformation. Periodicum biogorum 109(2), 115–121 (2007). https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/314210.9._Maric_Vranes-Periodicum.pdfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sumy State UniversitySumyUkraine
  2. 2.Chubu UniversityMatsumotoJapan

Personalised recommendations