Advertisement

The Development of Human Creativity as a Way to Compete Globally and Make Knowledge Economy More Inclusive

  • Elina Benea-Popuşoi
  • Svetlana DucaEmail author
Conference paper
  • 8 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1191)

Abstract

The paper aims at examining the development of human creativity as a way to compete globally and make knowledge economy more inclusive. The research reveals that creativity correlates with personality and that personalisation of human resources is the prerequisite for their transformation into human capital. The creative thought or behaviour must be both novel/original and useful/adaptive. Although it is difficult to measure and quantify creativity, a series of models were elaborated, of which the model of the “four Ps of creativity” is reviewed in the article. The authors reiterate creativity is linked to innovation since the former produces the latter and there is a large agreement that creativity is “getting the idea”, while innovation is “doing something about it”. Drawing on reports’ data, the authors consider the quest for creativity as globally high, based on people’s growing appreciation of creativity, evidenced creativity gap, and individuals’ expectations for valorising creativity both in the private and public sectors. Theoretically, the process of globalization fosters creativity through greater openness and exposure, whereas creativity enhances global competitiveness at the level of individuals, companies, countries. In practice, the confinements of the knowledge economy should be considered such as its low inclusiveness, marginalization of specific social groups and certain countries like Republic of Moldova, which face an increase in both the risks and opportunities related to their human capital. The authors conclude the ability of these countries to preserve human capital at home is proportional to their investments in valorising this capital, also through their educational systems, which besides, have to be adapted via fostering creativity within the teaching-learning process.

Keywords

Creativity Quest for creativity Creativity gap Creators Non-creators Innovation Global competitiveness Knowledge-based economy Knowledge-driven economy Economic vanguardism Insular knowledge economy Inclusive knowledge economy Educational system Teaching-learning process 

References

  1. 1.
    Adobe Report: State of create global benchmark study (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adobe Report: State of create (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barron, F.: The disposition toward originality. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51(3), 478–485 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benea-Popuşoi, E.: The transcendence of the human capital towards spirituality. In: International Scientific Conference Classical and Innovative Approaches in Contemporary Economic Thought: Considerations Regarding the Quality of Life in the Context of A Changing Europe. ASEM, Chişinău, pp. 109–111 (2016). http://irek.ase.md/xmlui/handle/123456789/294
  5. 5.
    Bocchi, G., Cianci, E., Montuori, A., Trigona, R., Nicolaus, O.: Educating for creativity. World Futur. J. New Parad. Res. 70(5–6), 336–369 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciobanu, C., Capsîzu, V.: Towards a knowledge-based society - an imperative of our time. Particularities of its edification in the Republic of Moldova. In: International Scientific Conference Classical and Innovative Approaches in Contemporary Economic Thought: Considerations Regarding the Quality of Life in the Context of A Changing Europe. ASEM, Chişinău, pp. 81–83 (2016). http://irek.ase.md/xmlui/handle/123456789/294
  7. 7.
    Cooper, T.: Thrive: The Highly Sensitive Person and Career. Invictus, Ozark, MO (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper, T.: Toward a creative criticality: revisiting critical thinking. Integr. Leadersh. Rev., May 2018. http://integralleadershipreview.com/16019-toward-a-creative-criticality-revisiting-critical-thinking/
  9. 9.
    Csikzentmihalyi, M.: Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Collins Publisher, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duca, G.: Science for sustainable development of society. In: Proceedings of International Conference “Technology + Society \(\rightarrow \) Future”, Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts, Podgorica, Scientific Meetings, vol. 138, p. 307 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feist, G.J.: Creative personality. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, pp. 344–345 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Firestien, R.L.: Leading on the Creative Edge: Gaining Competitive Advantage Through the Power of Creative Problem Solving. Pinon Press, Colorado Springs (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Florida, R., Mellander, C., King, K.: The Global Creativity Index. Martin Prosperity Institute, p. 8 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Friedman, T.L.: The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Macmillan, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson, R.: The ‘art’of creative teaching: implications for higher education. Teach. High. Educ. 15(5), 607–613 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goulet, D.: The Cruel Choice: A New Concept in the Theory of Development, pp. 87–94. Atheneum, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gruszka, A., Tang, M.: The 4P’s creativity model and its application in different fields. In: Handbook of the Management of Creativity and Innovation: Theory and Practice, pp. 51–71. World Scientific (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaufman, G.: The Content and Logical Structure of Creativity Concepts: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Creativity Research. Ablex, Norwood (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moldovanu, D.: Economia Imaginaţiei Creative / Economics of the Creative Imagination (own translation), p. 86. Ştiinţa, ARC, Chişinău (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Montuori, A.: Creative inquiry and discovering the unforeseen. California Institute of Integral Studies (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Montuori, A.: Creative inquiry: confronting the challenges of scholarship in the 21st century. World Futur. J. New Parad. Res. 44, 64–70 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rickards, T.: The management of innovation: recasting the role of creativity. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 5(1), 14 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rhodes, M.: An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan 42(7), 305–310 (1961)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robinson, K.: The creative enterprise: investing in the arts in the 21st century. New Stateman arts lecture. The Arts Council of England, London (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwab, K.: The fourth industrial revolution, 2016. In: World Economic Forum, Switzerland (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Simonton, D.K.: Scientific talent, training, and performance: intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 12(1), 28–46 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stein, M.I.: Stimulating Creativity. Academic Press, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Unger, R.M.: The Knowledge Economy. Verso Books, Brooklyn (2019)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vehar, J.: Creativity and innovation: what is the difference. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, pp. 383–389 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Young, R.: Competitive collaboration in a global knowledge economy. In: Knowledge Management Middle East, Abu Dhabi Conference, pp. 15–16 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academy of Economic Studies of MoldovaChişinăuRepublic of Moldova

Personalised recommendations