Advertisement

The Influence of Sugar-Free Label Formats and Colors on Consumers’ Acceptance of Sugar-Free Foods

  • Ping Liu
  • Hong WangEmail author
  • Wei Li
  • Bo Hu
Conference paper
  • 42 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1190)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of sugar-free label design on consumers’ acceptance of sugar-free foods. The sugar-free food labels of 2 products (caramel treats and herbal tea) were analyzed using a factorial design with 2 3-level variables: sugar-free label format (direct, sweetener and indirect) and color (red, green and black). A total of 436 participants (48.9% males, \(M_{age}=20.35\), \(SD=1.84\)) from a Chinese university participated in the study. A general linear model and a level of significance of 0.05 were used to analyze the data. The results suggested that when the sugar-free label was in the direct format, the color green was the best fit. However, when the sugar-free label was in the sweetener format, the participants’ acceptance of the red label was higher. Similarly, the color red was also the best fit for the indirect format. These conclusions can provide theoretical references for food enterprises to promote the effects of sugar-free food information communications, the design of sugar-free labels, and the consumption of sugar-free foods.

Keywords

Sugar-free food Food label Design Food acceptance 

References

  1. 1.
    Angka, S., Hémar-Nicolas, V., et al.: How packaging colours and claims influence children’s vegetable attitude and intake-an exploratory cross-cultural comparison between Indonesia and Denmark. Food Qual. Prefer. 79, 103–795 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bottomley, P.A., Doyle, J.R.: The interactive effects of colors and products on perceptions of brand logo appropriateness. Market. Theory 6(1), 63–83 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carnevale, M., Luna, D., Lerman, D.: Brand linguistics: a theory-driven framework for the study of language in branding. Int. J. Res. Market. 34(2), 572–591 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi, H., Paek, H.J., et al.: Are nutrient-content claims always effective? Match-up effects between product type and claim type in food advertising. Int. J. Adv. 31(2), 421–443 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi, J., Jessica Li, Y., Samper, A.: The influence of health motivation and calorie ending on preferences for indulgent foods. J. Consumer Res. 46(3), 606–619 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chrysochou, P., Grunert, K.G.: Health-related ad information and health motivation effects on product evaluations. J. Bus. Res. 67(6), 1209–1217 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dickson-Spillmann, M., Siegrist, M.: Consumers’ knowledge of healthy diets and its correlation with dietary behaviour. J. Hum. Nutr. Dietetics 24(1), 54–60 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dutta-Bergman, M.J.: Developing a profile of consumer intention to seek out additional information beyond a doctor: the role of communicative and motivation variables. Health Commun. 17(1), 1–16 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fung, T.T., Malik, V., et al.: Sweetened beverage consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 89(4), 1037–1042 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geraci, C., Gozzi, M., et al.: How grammar can cope with limited short-term memory: simultaneity and seriality in sign languages. Cognition 106(2), 780–804 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hartmann, C., Hieke, S., et al.: European consumer healthiness evaluation of ‘free-from’ labelled food products. Food Qual. Prefer. 68, 377–388 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Honorio, A.R., Pereira, G.S., et al.: How can previous knowledge about food science/technology and received information affect consumer perception of processed orange juice? J. Sens. Stud. 34(5), e12525 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoppert, K., Zahn, S., et al.: Consumer acceptance of regular and reduced-sugar yogurt enriched with different types of dietary fiber. Int. Dairy J. 28(1), 1–7 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, L., Lu, J.: The impact of package color and the nutrition content labels on the perception of food healthiness and purchase intention. J. Food Products Market. 22(2), 191–218 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson, R.K., Appel, L.J., et al.: Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 120(11), 1011–1020 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lieven, T., Grohmann, B., et al.: The effect of brand design on brand gender perceptions and brand preference. Eur. J. Market. 49, 24 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lustig, R.H., Schmidt, L.A., Brindis, C.D.: The toxic truth about sugar. Nature 482(7383), 27–29 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maga, J.: Influence of color on taste thresholds. Chem. Sens. 1(1), 115–119 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mai, R., Symmank, C., Seeberg-Elverfeldt, B.: Light and pale colors in food packaging: when does this package cue signal superior healthiness or inferior tastiness? J. Retail. 92(4), 426–444 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oliveira, D., Ares, G., Deliza, R.: The effect of health/hedonic claims on consumer hedonic and sensory perception of sugar reduction: case study with orange/passionfruit nectars. Food Res. Int. 108, 111–118 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Petit, O., Lunardo, R., Rickard, B.: Small is beautiful: the role of anticipated food waste in consumers’ avoidance of large packages. J. Bus. Res. 113, 326–336 (2019)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pieters, R., Wedel, M., Batra, R.: The stopping power of advertising: measures and effects of visual complexity. J. Market. 74(5), 48–60 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Popkin, B.M., Nielsen, S.J.: The sweetening of the world’s diet. Obesity Res. 11(11), 1325–1332 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reedy, J., Krebs-Smith, S.M.: Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 110(10), 1477–1484 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ronda, F., Gómez, M., et al.: Effects of polyols and nondigestible oligosaccharides on the quality of sugar-free sponge cakes. Food Chem. 90(4), 549–555 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sapp, S.G., Downing-Matibag, T.: Consumer acceptance of food irradiation: a test of the recreancy theorem. Int. J. Consumer Stud. 33(4), 417–424 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schmitt, B.H., Pan, Y., Tavassoli, N.T.: Language and consumer memory: the impact of linguistic differences between Chinese and English. J. Consumer Res. 21(3), 419–431 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schuldt, J.P.: Does green mean healthy? Nutrition label color affects perceptions of healthfulness. Health Commun. 28(8), 814–821 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Septianto, F., Kemper, J., Paramita, W.: The role of imagery in promoting organic food. J. Bus. Res. 101, 104–115 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shen, M., Shi, L., Gao, Z.: Beyond the food label itself: how does color affect attention to information on food labels and preference for food attributes? Food Qual. Prefer. 64, 47–55 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sundar, A., Noseworthy, T.J.: Place the logo high or low? Using conceptual metaphors of power in packaging design. J. Market. 78(5), 138–151 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Te Morenga, L., Mallard, S., Mann, J.: Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. Bmj 346, e7492 (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Temple, N.J.: Front-of-package food labels: a narrative review. Appetite 144, 104485 (2019)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Van Osselaer, S.M., Alba, J.W.: Consumer learning and brand equity. J. Consumer Res. 27(1), 1–16 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vasiljevic, M., Pechey, R., Marteau, T.M.: Making food labels social: the impact of colour of nutritional labels and injunctive norms on perceptions and choice of snack foods. Appetite 91, 56–63 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Walsh, L.M., Toma, R.B., et al.: Color preference and food choice among children. J. Psychol. 124(6), 645–653 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang, Q., Oostindjer, M., et al.: Snacks with nutrition labels: tastiness perception, healthiness perception, and willingness to pay by Norwegian adolescents. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 48(2), 104–111 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Huang, L., et al.: Eat with your eyes: package color influences the expectation of food taste and healthiness moderated by external eating. Market. Manag. 25(2), 71–87 (2019)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Xu, X., Chen, R., Liu, M.: The impact of uppercase and lowercase lettering logos on perception of the brand. Market. Lett. 31(2), 75–86 (2016)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yarar, N., Machiels, C.J., Orth, U.R.: Shaping up: how package shape and consumer body conspire to affect food healthiness evaluation. Food Qual. Prefer. 75, 209–219 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Peters, J.C., et al.: The influence of adding spices to reduced sugar foods on overall liking. J. Food Sci. 83(3), 814–821 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    de Souza, V.R., et al.: Analysis of various sweeteners in low-sugar mixed fruit jam: equivalent sweetness, time-intensity analysis and acceptance test. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 48(7), 1541–1548 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bialkova, S., et al.: Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers’ choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking. Appetite 76, 66–75 (2014). 48(7), 1541–1548Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business School of Sichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Business School of Chengdu University of TechnologyChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of Management ScienceChengdu University of TechnologyChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations