Advertisement

The Identification of the Company Profile Listed on the Romanian Stock Exchange Involved in CSR Actions

  • Nucă DumitriţaEmail author
  • Grosu Maria
  • Mihalciuc Camelia
  • Apetri Anişoara
Conference paper
  • 31 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1190)

Abstract

The transition of society, in general, and the economy, in particular, towards a sustainable model of development is a necessity, caused by imminent threats related to the climate change crisis that is affecting us today. Economic entities, through the models of sustainable development adopted, are considered important actors in supporting a sustainable economy, which respond not only to the stakeholders, but to the community in general. Based on these considerations, in our scientific approach, the problematic approach presents, after reviewing the specialized literature, the sustainable development model adopted by the companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange (BSE) on the regulated market, as a result of the measures imposed, in particular, at EU level, but also on its own initiative according to the 2030 Agenda.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibilities Sustainable business model Sustainable development Sustainable development goals 

References

  1. 1.
    Aldaz, M., Alvarez, I., Calvo, J.: Non-financial reports, anti-corruption performance and corporate reputation. Res. Methodol. 17(58), 1321–1340 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Archie, B.C.: A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 4(4), 497–505 (1979). http://www.jstor.org/stable/257850
  3. 3.
    Archie, B.C.: Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Bus. Ethics Q. 10(1), 33–42 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beattie, V., Smith Sarah, J.: Value creation and business models: refocusing the intellectual capital debate. Br. Account. Rev. 45(4), 243–254 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belaşcu, L.: Responsabilitatea corporativǎ şi performanţele companiilor multinaţionale, în studii post-doctorale în economie. In: Studii şi cercetǎri privind impactul globalizǎrii asupra structurii şi dinamicii economiilor, vol. 5, pp. 66–130 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beltramello, A., Haye-Fayle, L., Pilat, D.: Why new business models matter for green growth (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benveniste, D., Griffiths, J., Sutton, P.: Sustainability and sustainable development. Sydney (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berheci, M.: Responsabilitatea corporativǎ şi performanţele companiilor multinaţionale. In: Studii şi cercetǎri privind impactul globalizǎrii asupra structurii şi dinamicii economiilor, vol. 5, pp. 1–8 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., et al.: A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 42–56 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brian, K.: The Brundtland report: our common future. Med. Conflict Surv. 4(1), 17–25 (1988)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carroll, A.B., Meeks, M.D.: Models of management morality: European applications and implications. Bus. Ethics A Eur. Rev. 8(2), 108–116 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dey, M., Sircar, S.: Integrating corporate social responsibility initiatives with business strategy: a study of some Indian companies. IUP J. Corp. Gov. 11(1), 36–51 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donatas, J.: Conceptual framework of value creation through CSR in separate member of value creation chain. Bull. Geogr. Soc.-Econ. Ser. 21(21), 69–78 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frank, B., Carlos, M., Jaco, Q., et al.: Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. J. Clean. Prod. 45, 1–8 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Galbreath, J.: Corporate social responsibility strategy: strategic options, global considerations. Corp. Gov.: Int. J.Bus. Soci. 6(2), 175–187 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goonetilleke, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Ayoko, G., et al.: Sustainable urban water environment: climate, pollution and adaptation (2014).  https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781004647
  17. 17.
    Jaba, E.: Econometrie aplicatǎ. Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Publishing House, Iaşi (1980)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    John, D.: Google corporate social responsibility (CSR). Research Methodology (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keeble, B.: The age of sustainable development. In: 2019 BASIQ International Conference: New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption, vol. 5, pp. 507–514 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kovačič, A.: Implementation of corporate social responsibility in central Europe. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 10(2), 87–98 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Magretta, J.: Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maria, G., Camelia, M.: Comprehensive income reporting by listed companies on the Bucharest stock exchange. Econometric study, vol. XV (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McPherson, P.: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) trends to look for in 2018. Forbes (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mihalciuc, C., Apetri, A.N.: Measuring and reporting non-financial performance of socially responsible companies. In: BASIQ International Conference: New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption, vol. 5, pp. 507–514 (2019)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mihalciuc, C., Apetri, A.: Adoption of sustainable development models at the level of companies. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “Information Society and Sustainable Development” (2019)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pintilescu, C.: Analizǎ statisticǎ multivariatǎ. Editura Universitǎţii (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rasmussen, B.: Business models and the theory of the firm (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Richard Ross, S.: The spatial distribution of development in Europe and its underlying sustainability correlations. Appl. Geogr. 63, 304–314 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Richardson, J.: The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strat. Change 17(5–6), 133–144 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Socoliuc, M., Grosu, V., Hlaciuc, E., et al.: Analysis of social responsibility and reporting methods of Romanian companies in the countries of the European Union. Sustainability 10(12), 4662 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Svensson, G.: A model of business ethics. J. Bus. Ethics. 77(3), 303–322 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9351-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Teece, D.J.: Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 172–194 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thomsen, C.: Sustainability (world commission on environment and development definition), pp. 2358–2363. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    United Nations: Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform (2019). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication
  35. 35.
    Weaver, G.R., Treviño, L.K.: Cochran PL Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990’s: an empirical study of the fortune 1000. J. Bus. Ethics 18(3), 283–294 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005726901050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wood, G.: A partnership model of corporate ethics. J. Bus. Ethics 40(1), 61–73 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019990724275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yu, S., Zia-ud-Din, M., Dilawer, R., et al.: Corporate social responsibility in Pakistan: a legal perspective with reference to MNEs. J. Polit. Law 12(3), 87 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zott, C., Amit, R.: Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 216–226 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nucă Dumitriţa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Grosu Maria
    • 2
  • Mihalciuc Camelia
    • 3
  • Apetri Anişoara
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AccountingAcademy of Economic Studies of MoldovaChişinăuRepublic of Moldova
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and Business Administration“Alexandru Ioan Cuza” UniversityIaşiRomania
  3. 3.Department of Accounting, Audit and Finance, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Public Administration“Stefan cel Mare” UniversitySuceavaRomania

Personalised recommendations