Advertisement

Enriching Synchronous Collaboration in Online Courses with Configurable Conversational Agents

  • Stergios TegosEmail author
  • Georgios Psathas
  • Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos
  • Christos Katsanos
  • Anastasios Karakostas
  • Costas Tsibanis
  • Stavros Demetriadis
Conference paper
  • 80 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12149)

Abstract

This work presents a novel approach for employing conversational agent technology in the context of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), aiming to support learners that work in groups to sustain productive forms of peer dialogue. An exploratory study is presented featuring 56 undergraduate computer science students, who interacted with a conversational agent in the context of an online course. The study investigates the practicability of using configurable conversational agents to provide collaborative learning support and serves as an opportunity to compare two intervention strategies: (a) converging agent interventions, presented in the form of tips relating closely to the topic of the activity and (b) diverging agent interventions, which do not relate directly to the activity topic and pose new domain-relevant questions. The study findings suggest that a convergent agent is often perceived as more helpful by the students. A discourse analysis also reveals a series of interesting interaction patterns, facilitating improvements in the design of future conversational agent systems.

Keywords

Conversational agent Online education Peer dialogue MOOC 

Notes

Acknowledgements and Disclaimer

This research has been funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Commission (project No 588438-EPP-1-2017-1-EL-EPPKA-KA) and reflects only the views of the authors. The Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use of the information presented.

References

  1. 1.
    Hone, K.S., El Said, G.R.: Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: a survey study. Comput. Educ. 98, 157–168 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feng, W., Tang, J., Liu, T.X.: Understanding dropouts in MOOCs. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp. 517–524 (2019)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conole, G.G.: MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia (39), 1–17 (2013). https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/234221
  4. 4.
    Shin, Y., Kim, D., Song, D.: Types and timing of scaffolding to promote meaningful peer interaction and increase learning performance in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 58(3), 640–661 (2020)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosé, C.P., Ferschke, O.: Technology support for discussion based learning: from computer supported collaborative learning to the future of massive open online courses. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(2), 660–678 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tegos, S., Demetriadis, S.: Conversational agents improve peer learning through building on prior knowledge. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 20(1), 99–111 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fryer, L.K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., Sherlock, Z.: Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: an experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75, 461–468 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graesser, A.C., Lippert, A.M., Hampton, A.J.: Successes and failures in building learning environments to promote deep learning: the value of conversational agents. In: Buder, J., Hesse, F.W. (eds.) Informational Environments, pp. 273–298. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64274-1_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tegos, S., Demetriadis, S., Psathas, G., Tsiatsos, T.: A configurable agent to advance peers’ productive dialogue in MOOCs. In: Følstad, A., et al. (eds.) CONVERSATIONS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11970, pp. 245–259. Springer, Cham (2020).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stergios Tegos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Georgios Psathas
    • 1
  • Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos
    • 1
  • Christos Katsanos
    • 1
  • Anastasios Karakostas
    • 2
  • Costas Tsibanis
    • 3
  • Stavros Demetriadis
    • 1
  1. 1.Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.CERTHThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.GUnetAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations