Advertisement

Supporting Students by Integrating an Open Learner Model in a Peer Assessment Platform

  • Gabriel Badea
  • Elvira PopescuEmail author
Conference paper
  • 102 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12149)

Abstract

An open learner model uses system’s representation of the student to support learning and reveal progress. The model contains information regarding learner’s characteristics such as level of knowledge, interests, involvement and other relevant cognitive aspects. The current paper presents an example of incorporating an open learner model in a peer assessment platform, more specifically LearnEval, and applying it in the context of a project-based learning scenario in a Web Applications Design course. The student is modeled based on several traits such as competence, involvement and assessment abilities. Furthermore, an aggregated overall score offers a general overview of the student capabilities. To incorporate the open learner model, a Scores module was integrated into LearnEval, offering intuitive, friendly and effective visualizations of the scores and a breakdown of the metrics composing them in the form of progress bars, gauges, column bars, trophies and medals. We offer a description of the context where the open learner model was put in practice as well as an example of how a learner could utilize it. An opinion survey regarding the experience with the open learner model was applied to the students at the end of the semester. The findings are encouraging, as the learners found the module easy to use, helpful and comprehensive and they examined it relatively often.

Keywords

Open learner model Peer assessment Peer review platform Student modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Badea, G., Popescu, E.: A web-based platform for peer assessment in technology enhanced learning: student module prototype. In: Proceedings of the ICALT 2019, pp. 372–374. IEEE CS Press (2019)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Badea, G., Popescu, E.: Instructor support module in a web-based peer assessment platform. In: Proceedings of the ICSTCC 2019, pp. 691–696. IEEE (2019)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Badea, G., Popescu, E.: Using peer assessment in conjunction with project-based learning: a comparative study. In: Proceedings of the ICALT 2020. IEEE CS Press (in press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bodily, R., et al.: Open learner models and learning analytics dashboards: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of the LAK 2018, pp. 41–50. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boubouka, M., Papanikolaou, K.A.: Alternative assessment methods in technology enhanced project-based learning. Int. J. Learn. Technol. 8(3), 263–296 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bull, S., Jackson, T.J., Lancaster, M.J.: Students’ interest in their misconceptions in first-year electrical circuits and mathematics courses. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 47(3), 307–318 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bull, S., McEvoy, A.T., Reid, E.: Learner models to promote reflection in combined desktop PC/mobile intelligent learning environments. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection. AIED 2003, pp. 199–208 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bull, S., Pain, H.: “Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?”: inspecting and questioning the student model. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AACE, pp. 501–508 (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Alfaro, L., Shavlovsky, M.: CrowdGrader: a tool for crowdsourcing the evaluation of homework assignments. In: Proceedings of the SIGCSE 2014, pp. 415–420. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hundhausen, C.D., Agrawal, A., Agarwal, P.: Talking about code: integrating pedagogical code reviews into early computing courses. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 13(3), 1–28 (2013). Article 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Law, C.Y., Grundy, J., Vasa, R., Cain, A.: An empirical study of user perceived usefulness and preference of open learner model visualisations. In: Proceedings of the VL/HCC 2016, pp. 49–53 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Alternative views on knowledge: presentation of open learner models. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 689–698. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazzola, L., Mazza, R.: GVIS: a facility for adaptively mashing up and representing open learner models. In: Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) EC-TEL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6383, pp. 554–559. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohanarajah, S., Kemp, R.H., Kemp, E.: Opening a fuzzy learner model. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection. AIED 2005, pp. 62–71 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Temperini, M., Sterbini, A.: Learning from peers: motivating students through reputation systems. In: Proceedings of the SAINT 2008, pp. 305–308 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wright, J.R., Thornton, C., Leyton-Brown, K.: Mechanical TA: partially automated high-stakes peer grading. In: Proceedings of the SIGCSE 2015, pp. 96–101 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zapata-Rivera, J.D., Greer, J.: Externalising learner modelling representations. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on External Representations in AIED: Multiple Forms and Multiple Roles. AIED 2001, pp. 71–76 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computers and Information Technology DepartmentUniversity of CraiovaCraiovaRomania

Personalised recommendations