Advertisement

Theoretical Background

  • Javier Galego PascualEmail author
Chapter
  • 53 Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

This chapter presents the essential theoretical background necessary to explain some of the most important concepts discussed throughout this thesis. The aim is to provide the reader with the basic tools to understand the many fundamental equations and approximations used in the contexts of cavity quantum electrodynamics (CQED) and quantum chemistry. We start by addressing the question of what is the quantum Hamiltonian for the light–matter interaction and illustrating what approximations play an important role in its definition. We then focus on the matter part of the light–matter Hamiltonian in order to provide the best possible description of a complex molecule. In this section we address the Born–Oppenheimer approximation, widely used in molecular and solid-state physics and in quantum chemistry. Additionally, we present the description of different characteristic phenomena of organic molecules such as chemical structure and reactions, and their response to the electromagnetic field. Then, we focus on this last part, discussing the important features of CQED and the different theoretical descriptions that study them. Finally we present the fundamentals of the two different regimes of light–matter interaction: weak and strong coupling.

References

  1. 1.
    Cohen-Tannoudji C, Dupont-Roc J, Grynberg G (1997) Photons and atomsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steck DA (2007) Quantum and atom optics, vol 47Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dirac PAM (1927) The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 114:243ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dirac PAM (1981) The principles of quantum mechanics, vol 27. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Majety VP, Zielinski A, Scrinzi A (2014) Mixed gauge in strong laser-matter interaction. J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 48:025601Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Göppert-Mayer M (1931) Über Elementarakte mit zwei Quantensprüngen. Annalen der Physik 401:273ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Power EA, Zienau S (1959) Coulomb gauge in non-relativistic quantum electro-dynamics and the shape of spectral lines. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 251:427Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Woolley RG (1971) Molecular quantum electrodynamics. Proc R Soc Lond A 321:557ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Power E, Thirunamachandran T (1982) Quantum electrodynamics in a cavity. Phys Rev A 25:2473Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Power EA, Thirunamachandran T (1980) The multipolar Hamiltonian in radiation theory. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 372:265Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Born M, Oppenheimer R (1927) Zur Quantentheorie der Molekeln. Annalen der Physik 389:457Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tully JC (2000) Perspective on “Zur Quantentheorie der Molekeln”. Theor Chem Acc Theory Comput Model (Theoretica Chimica Acta) 103:173Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Born M, Huang K (1954) Dynamical theory of crystal lattices. Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Worth GA, Cederbaum LS (2004) Beyond Born-Oppenheimer: molecular dynamics through a conical intersection. Annu Rev Phys Chem 55:127Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levine BG, Martínez TJ (2007) Isomerization through conical intersections. Annu Rev Phys Chem 58:613Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mead CA, Truhlar DG (1982) Conditions for the definition of a strictly diabatic electronic basis for molecular systems. J Chem Phys 77:6090Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Novotny L, Hecht B (2009) Principles of nano-optics. ISBN: 9781107005464Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leonas V et al (2000) Photosynthetic excitons. World ScientificGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiss U (2012) Quantum dissipative systems, vol 10. World ScientificGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stone A (2013) The theory of intermolecular forces, 2nd edn. OUP OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sheppard D, Terrell R, Henkelman G (2008) Optimization methods for finding minimum energy paths. J Chem Phys 128:134106ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Truhlar DG, Gordon MS (1990) From force fields to dynamics: classical and quantal paths. Science 249:491Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prezhdo OV, Rossky PJ (1997) Mean-field molecular dynamics with surface hopping. J Chem Phys 107:825Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barbatti M (2011) Nonadiabatic dynamics with trajectory surface hopping method. Wiley Interdisc Rev Comput Mol Sci 1:620Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eyring H (1935) The activated complex in chemical reactions. J Chem Phys 3:107ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Arrhenius S (1889) Über die dissociationswärme und den einfluss der temperatur auf den dissociationsgrad der elektrolyte. Zeitschrift für physikalische Chemie 4:96Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miller WH (1993) Beyond transition-state theory: a rigorous quantum theory of chemical reaction rates. Acc Chem Res 26:174Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yamamoto T (1960) Quantum statistical mechanical theory of the rate of exchange chemical reactions in the gas phase. J Chem Phys 33:281ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller WH (1974) Quantum mechanical transition state theory and a new semiclassical model for reaction rate constants. J Chem Phys 61:1823ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miller WH, Schwartz SD, Tromp JW (1983) Quantum mechanical rate constants for bimolecular reactions. J Chem Phys 79:4889ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jackson JD (2007) Classical electrodynamics. WileyGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bonin KD, Kresin VV (1997) Electric-dipole polarizabilities of atoms, molecules, and clusters. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. LtdGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rescigno TN, McKoy V (1975) Rigorous method for computing photoabsorption cross sections from a basis-set expansion. Phys Rev A 12:522Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kasha M (1950) Characterization of electronic transitions in complex molecules. Discuss Faraday Soc 9:14Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nitzan A, Jortner J, Rentzepis PM (1971) Internal conversion in large molecules. Mol Phys 22:585ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    May V, Kühn O (2011) Charge and energy transfer dynamics in molecular systems. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nitzan A (2006) Chemical dynamics in condensed phases: relaxation, transfer and reactions in condensed molecular systems. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barbry M, Koval P, Marchesin F, Esteban R, Borisov AG, Aizpurua J, Sánchez-Portal D (2015) Atomistic near-field nanoplasmonics: reaching atomic-scale resolution in nanooptics. Nano Lett 15:3410ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huttner B, Barnett SM (1992) Quantization of the electromagnetic field in dielectrics. Phys Rev A 46:4306Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scheel S, Buhmann SY (2008) Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics—concepts and applications. Acta Physica Slovaca 58:675Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Buhmann SY (2007) Casimir-polder forces on atoms in the presence of magnetoelectric bodies. Thesis (PhD), Friedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kavokin A, Baumberg J, Malpuech G, Laussy F (2008) MicrocavitiesGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tame MS, McEnery K, Özdemir Ş, Lee J, Maier S, Kim M (2013) Quantum plasmonics. Nat Phys 9:329Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hopfield J (1958) Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals. Phys Rev 112:1555ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dung HT, Knöll L, Welsch D-G (1998) Three-dimensional quantization of the electromagnetic field in dispersive and absorbing inhomogeneous dielectrics. Phys Rev A 57:3931ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van Vlack C, Kristensen PT, Hughes S (2012) Spontaneous emission spectra and quantum light-matter interactions from a strongly coupled quantum dot metal-nanoparticle system. Phys Rev B 85:075303ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Alpeggiani F, Andreani LC (2014) Quantum theory of surface plasmon polaritons: planar and spherical geometries. Plasmonics 9:965Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Li R-Q, Hernángomez-Pérez D, García-Vidal FJ, Fernández-Domínguez AI (2016) Transformation optics approach to plasmon-exciton strong coupling in nanocavities. Phys Rev Lett 117:107401ADSGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Savage KJ, Hawkeye MM, Esteban R, Borisov AG, Aizpurua J, Baumberg JJ (2012) Revealing the quantum regime in tunnelling plasmonics. Nature 491:574ADSGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhang P, Feist J, Rubio A, García-González P, García-Vidal FJ (2014) Ab initio nanoplasmonics: the impact of atomic structure. Phys Rev B 90:161407(R)ADSGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Varas A, García-González P, Feist J, García-Vidal FJ, Rubio A (2016) Quantum plasmonics: from jellium models to ab initio calculations. Nanophotonics 5:409Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vukics A, Grießer T, Domokos P (2014) Elimination of the \({{A}}\)-square problem from cavity QED. Phys Rev Lett 112:073601ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Keeling J (2007) Coulomb interactions, gauge invariance, and phase transitions of the Dicke model. J Phys Condens Matter 19:295213Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kirton P, Roses MM, Keeling J, Dalla Torre EG (2018) Introduction to the Dicke model: from equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa. Adv Quantum Technol 1800043Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    De Bernardis D, Jaako T, Rabl P (2018) Cavity quantum electrodynamics in the nonperturbative regime. Phys Rev A 97:043820ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rokaj V, Welakuh DM, Ruggenthaler M, Rubio A (2018) Light-matter interaction in the long-wavelength limit: no ground-state without dipole self-energy. J Phys B 51:034005ADSGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Todorov Y, Sirtori C (2014) Few-electron ultrastrong light-matter coupling in a quantum LC circuit. Phys Rev X 4:041031Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    De Bernardis D, Pilar P, Jaako T, De Liberato S, Rabl P (2018) Breakdown of gauge invariance in ultrastrong-coupling cavity QED. Phys Rev A 98:053819ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Andrews DL, Jones GA, Salam A, Woolley RG (2018) Perspective: quantum Hamiltonians for optical interactions. J Chem Phys 148:040901ADSGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Stokes A, Nazir A (2019) Gauge ambiguities imply Jaynes-Cummings physics remains valid in ultrastrong coupling QED. Nat Commun 10:499Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kónya G, Vukics A, Domokos P. The equivalence of the Power-Zineau-Woolley picture and the Poincaré gauge from the very first principlesGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    George J, Chervy T, Shalabney A, Devaux E, Hiura H, Genet C, Ebbesen TW (2016) Multiple Rabi splittings under ultrastrong vibrational coupling. Phys Rev Lett 117:153601ADSGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Chikkaraddy R, de Nijs B, Benz F, Barrow SJ, Scherman OA, Rosta E, Demetriadou A, Fox P, Hess O, Baumberg JJ (2016) Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities. Nature 535:127ADSGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chikkaraddy R, Turek VA, Kongsuwan N, Benz F, Carnegie C, van de Goor T, de Nijs B, Demetriadou A, Hess O, Keyser UF, Baumberg JJ (2018) Mapping nanoscale hotspots with single-molecule emitters assembled into plasmonic nanocavities using DNA origami. Nano Lett 18:405ADSGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Autore M, Li P, Dolado I, Alfaro-Mozaz FJ, Esteban R, Atxabal A, Casanova F, Hueso LE, Alonso-González P, Aizpurua J, Nikitin AY, Vélez S, Hillenbrand R (2018) Boron nitride nanoresonators for phonon-enhanced molecular vibrational spectroscopy at the strong coupling limit. Light Sci Appl 7:17172Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zengin G, Wersäll M, Nilsson S, Antosiewicz TJ, Käll M, Shegai T (2015) Realizing strong light-matter interactions between single-nanoparticle plasmons and molecular excitons at ambient conditions. Phys Rev Lett 114:157401ADSGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gubbin CR, Maier SA, De Liberato S (2017) Theoretical investigation of phonon polaritons in SiC micropillar resonators. Phys Rev B 95:035313ADSGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Jaynes ET, Cummings FW (1963) Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser. Proc IEEE 51:89Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tavis M, Cummings FW (1968) Exact solution for an N-molecule-radiation-field Hamiltonian. Phys Rev 170:379Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Garraway BM (2011) The Dicke model in quantum optics: Dicke model revisited. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 369:1137Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Michetti P, Mazza L, La Rocca GC (2015) Strongly coupled organic microcavities. In: Zhao YS (ed) Organic nanophotonics, nano-optics and nanophotonics, vol 39. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Agranovich V, Gartstein YN, Litinskaya M (2011) Hybrid resonant organic-inorganic nanostructures for optoelectronic applications. Chem Rev 111:5179Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Spano FC (2015) Optical microcavities enhance the exciton coherence length and eliminate vibronic coupling in J-aggregates. J Chem Phys 142Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Herrera F, Spano FC (2016) Cavity-controlled chemistry in molecular ensembles. Phys Rev Lett 116:238301Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ćwik JA, Kirton P, De Liberato S, Keeling J (2016) Excitonic spectral features in strongly coupled organic polaritons. Phys Rev A 93:33840ADSGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Zeb MA, Kirton PG, Keeling J (2018) Exact states and spectra of vibrationally dressed polaritons. ACS Photonics 5:249Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Wu N, Feist J, Garcia-Vidal FJ (2016) When polarons meet polaritons: exciton-vibration interactions in organic molecules strongly coupled to confined light fields. Phys Rev B 94:195409ADSGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Herrera F, Spano FC (2017) Dark vibronic polaritons and the spectroscopy of organic microcavities. Phys Rev Lett 118Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Herrera F, Spano FC (2018) Theory of nanoscale organic cavities: the essential role of vibration-photon dressed states. ACS Photonics 5:65Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    del Pino J (2018) Vibrational and electronic strong light–matter coupling with molecular excitations. Thesis (PhD), Universidad Autónoma de MadridGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Flick J, Ruggenthaler M, Appel H, Rubio A (2015) Kohn-Sham approach to quantum electrodynamical density-functional theory: exact time-dependent effective potentials in real space. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:15285ADSGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Flick J, Ruggenthaler M, Appel H, Rubio A (2017) Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:3026Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tokatly IV (2013) Time-dependent density functional theory for many-electron systems interacting with cavity photons. Phys Rev Lett 110:233001ADSGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Ruggenthaler M, Flick J, Pellegrini C, Appel H, Tokatly IV, Rubio A (2014) Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory. Phys Rev A 90:012508ADSGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Feist J, Galego J, Garcia-Vidal FJ (2018) Polaritonic chemistry with organic molecules. ACS Photonics 5:205Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Flick J, Appel H, Ruggenthaler M, Rubio A (2017) Cavity Born-Oppenheimer approximation for correlated electron-nuclear-photon systems. J Chem Theory Comput 13:1616Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Somaschi N, Giesz V, De Santis L, Loredo J, Almeida MP, Hornecker G, Portalupi SL, Grange T, Antón C, Demory J et al (2016) Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nat Photonics 10:340ADSGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Purcell EM (1946) Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frquencies. Phys Rev 69:674Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Louisell WH, Louisell WH (1973) Quantum statistical properties of radiation, vol 7. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Koenderink AF (2010) On the use of purcell factors for plasmon antennas. Opt Lett 35:4208ADSGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kristensen PT, Van Vlack C, Hughes S (2012) Generalized effective mode volume for leaky optical cavities. Opt Lett 37:1649ADSGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Sauvan C, Hugonin JP, Maksymov IS, Lalanne P (2013) Theory of the spontaneous optical emission of nanosize photonic and plasmon resonators. Phys Rev Lett 110:237401ADSGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Brecha R, Rice P, Xiao M (1999) N two-level atoms in a driven optical cavity: quantum dynamics of forward photon scattering for weak incident fields. Phys Rev A 59:2392ADSGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sáez-Blázquez R, Feist J, Fernández-Domínguez A, García-Vidal F (2017) Enhancing photon correlations through plasmonic strong coupling. Optica 4:1363ADSGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Bozhevolnyi SI, Khurgin JB (2016) Fundamental limitations in spontaneous emission rate of single-photon sources. Optica 3:1418Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Törmä P, Barnes WL (2015) Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review. Rep Prog Phys 78:13901Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Henkelman G, Uberuaga BP, Jónsson H (2000) A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J Chem Phys 113:9901ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Física teórica de la materia condensadaUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations