Advertisement

Assessment of Preformed 3D-Thermoplastic Road Markings for Long-Term Durability, Skid Resistance and Texture Functionality

  • Kalpesh Purohit
  • Mujib RahmanEmail author
  • Andrew Price
  • Alan Woodside
Conference paper
  • 70 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 76)

Abstract

Road Markings are an important safety feature for directing and guiding traffic without distracting its drivers. The erosion of the marking material as a result of prolonged exposure to rain and traffic actions, greatly reduce their performance. In this paper, results from field and laboratory investigations on innovative preformed thermoplastic road markings sheet with 3D impressions are presented. An immersion wheel tracking test was conducted in the laboratory for evaluating material effectiveness against stripping in long-term exposure to water and traffic loading. The results showed that preformed sheet installed on pre-heated and non-heated asphalt surfaces are capable of withstanding long (20,000 cycles) exposure of continuous traffic while submerged in water. Overall, the thermoplastic sheet installed in both conditions, demonstrated excellent performance against stripping, although the performance was relatively better when installed on the pre-heated surface. Furthermore, one-year field observations showed that preformed marking installed on asphalt and concrete surface retains their macrotexture, maintains excellent dry and wet frictions. The 3D impression was also found beneficial on drivers’ behavior for speed reduction. Depending on the vehicle type, the reduction was 20–31% immediately after installation and 9–17% after one year. Overall, this study suggests that preformed thermoplastic road marking is not only a durable product but also 3D illusion that provides some traffic calming benefits.

Keywords

3D road marking Preformed thermoplastic road marking Sand patch Skid resistance Long term performance Stripping resistance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the Preformed Markings Ltd UK for providing supports during this project.

References

  1. AASHTO T 324 (2004) Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted hot mix asphalt (HMA)Google Scholar
  2. American Society for Testing and Materials (2018) Standard designations E-303-93. Standard test method for measuring surface frictional properties using the british pendulum testerGoogle Scholar
  3. Anon (2012) PREMARK®. https://www.preformedmarkings.co.uk/traffic-applications/premarkr/. Accessed 5 Oct 2018
  4. Brusentseva, T, Shikalov V, Fomin V (2019) Cold spray deposition of thermoplastic powder for road marking. In: EPJ web of conferencesGoogle Scholar
  5. DMRB (2008) Standards for highways, vol 7, section 3Google Scholar
  6. Highways Act (1980) Legislation.gov.ukGoogle Scholar
  7. IS EN 1436 (2004) European standard for road markingGoogle Scholar
  8. Naidoo S, Steyn M (2018) Performance of thermoplastic road-marking material. J South African Inst Civil Eng 60(2):P9–P22 ISSAN 1021-2019, Paper 1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Praticò FG, Vaianab R (2015) A study on the relationship between mean texture depth and mean profile depth of asphalt pavements. Constr Build Mater 101(Part 1):P72–P79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. PREMARK (2012) Specifications and MSDS sheet, preformed thermoplastic—melt down road & pavement striping. http://preformedthermoplastic.com/premark-specifications-and-msds-sheet/. Accessed 5 Oct 2018
  11. Rehman SAU, Duggal AK (2015) Comparative analysis of pavement marking material based on retro-reflectivity. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 02(05):964–970Google Scholar
  12. Sasidharan L, Karwa V, Donnell ET (2009) Use of pavement marking degradation models to develop a pavement marking management system. Public Works Manag Policy 14(2):148–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Scottish Road Research Board (2015) Durability of white thermoplastic road markingsGoogle Scholar
  14. Traffic Signs Manual (2018) Chapter 5: Road Marking, Department of Transport, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Vacek S, Schimmel C, Dillmann R (2007) Road-marking analysis for autonomous vehicle guidance. In: European conference on mobile robots, 19–21 September, Freiburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang S (2010) Comparative analysis of NTPEP pavement marking performance evaluation results. MSc dissertation. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/akron1271369205/inline

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kalpesh Purohit
    • 1
  • Mujib Rahman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrew Price
    • 2
  • Alan Woodside
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringBrunel University LondonUxbridgeUK
  2. 2.Preformed Markings Ltd.Byfleet, West ByfleetUK

Personalised recommendations