Advertisement

In-Situ Measurement of Discontinuity Movements in Concrete Pavement Structures

  • Dongkyu Kim
  • Hyunsik Hwang
  • Christopher Jabonero
  • Yoon-Ho ChoEmail author
Conference paper
  • 62 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 76)

Abstract

Asphalt Concrete (AC) overlay is one of the typical pavement maintenance strategies on Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements that enhances its service life. However, reflection cracking is one of the common distresses due to the cyclic expansion and contraction of the joints or cracks in the PCC layer that attributed to the variations in environmental conditions. The current overlay tester (OT) protocol in Texas suggested a single maximum opening displacement (MOD) in PCC pavement types. However, the displacement magnitude varies accordingly. As such, this study focuses on the field quantification of Jointed Concrete Pavement (JCP) and Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement’s (CRCP) discontinuity movements with respect to the application of asphalt overlay and seasonal changes. Crackmeters were installed at the JCP and CRCP sections and measurements were recorded during winter and summer. Preliminary results have shown that the PCC pavement joint/crack movements significantly reduced after overlay placement. Furthermore, variations of the movement relative to PCC pavement types and seasonal variations are distinct and significant. Hence, the magnitudes of MOD according to pavement types are suggested to be modified when performing reflection cracking resistance evaluation using the asphalt overlay tester.

Keywords

PCC discontinuity movement AC overlay Reflective cracking Thermal insulation Overlay tester 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted under research project 「Development of High-Performance Concrete Pavement Maintenance Technology to Extend Roadway Life (Project No: 18TLRP-B146707-01)」 funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) and the Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA).

References

  1. Armaghani JM, Larsen TJ, Smith LL (1987) Temperature response of concrete pavements. Transp Res Rec TRB 1121:23–33Google Scholar
  2. Chen DH, Zhou F, Lee JL, Hu S, Stokoe II KH, Yang J (2007) Threshold values for reflective cracking based on continuous deflection measurements. Can J Civ Eng 34:1257–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chou C, Cheng HJ, Lin S (2005) Analysis of concrete joint movements and seasonal thermal stresses at the Chiang Kai-Shek international airport. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud 6: 1217–1230Google Scholar
  4. Darter MI, Barenberg EJ (1977) Design of zero maintenance plain concrete pavement, vol. II-Design Manual, FHWA-RD-77-112. Federal Highway Administration, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Jabonero C, Park JH, Ryu SW, Lin W, Cho YH (2019) Development of a multi-modal overlay tester for the evaluation of asphalt overlay cracking behaviors. Can J Civ Eng  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2019-0227
  6. Kapiri M, Tutumluer E, Barenberg EJ (2000) Analysis of temperature effects on pavement response at denver international airport. The 2020 Vision of Air Transportation. ASCE, pp 125–143Google Scholar
  7. Khazanovich L, Balbo JT, Johanneck L, Lederle R, Marasteanu M, Saxena P, Tompkins D, Vancura M, Watson M, Harvey J, Santero NJ, Signore J (2013) Design and construction guidelines for thermally insulated concrete pavements, publication MN/RC 2013-02. Minnesota Department of TransportationGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee SW, Stoffels SM (2001) Analysis of in situ horizontal joint movements in rigid pavements. Transp Res Rec TRB 1778:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nam JH, Kim DH, Choi S, Won MC (2001) Variation of crack width over time in continuously reinforced concrete pavement. Transp Res Rec TRB 2037:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morian DA, Suhahar N, Stoffels SM (1999) Evaluation of rigid pavement joint seal movement. Transp Res Rec TRB 1684:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rufino D, Roesler J, Barenberg EJ (2004) Effect of pavement temperature on concrete pavement joint responses. In: FAA worldwide airport technology transfer conference, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Walubita LF, Faruk AN, Koohi Y, Luo R, Scullion T, Lytton R (2013) The overlay tester (OT): comparison with other crack test methods and recommendations for surrogate crack tests, publication FHWA/TX-13/0-6607-2. FHWA, US Department of TransportationGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhou F, Scullion T (2003) Upgraded overlay tester and its application to characterize reflection cracking resistance of asphalt mixtures, publication FHWA/TX-04/0-4467-1. FHWA, US Department of TransportationGoogle Scholar
  14. Zou X (2016) Analysis of temperature gradient for cement concrete slab under the asphalt overlaying. In: BESETO international conference on concrete pavementsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongkyu Kim
    • 1
  • Hyunsik Hwang
    • 1
  • Christopher Jabonero
    • 1
  • Yoon-Ho Cho
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringChung-Ang UniversityDongjak-gu, SeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations