Advertisement

Predictions of Corporate Governance Models

  • Naeem TabassumEmail author
  • Satwinder Singh
Chapter
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to examine the role of the Board of Directors in Corporate Governance and their relationship with firm performance. Empirical findings of key studies on the effectiveness of Boards, as internal Corporate Governance mechanism, with performance, are discussed. The chapter also explains the use and overall importance of multi-theory framework in seeking to garner better understanding of the relationship of the Board Structure with the Firm Performance.

References

  1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69–87.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A Theory of Friendly Boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, S. M., & Flynn, P. M. (2005). Local Knowledge Advances Women’s Access to Corporate Boards. Corporate Governance an International Review, 13(6), 836–846.Google Scholar
  4. Afza, T., & Nazir, M. S. (2012). Role of Corporate Governance in Operating Performance Enhancement of Mergers and Acquisitions in Pakistan. Elixir Finance, 42, 6447–6456.Google Scholar
  5. Agrawal, A., & Chadha, S. (2005). Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals. Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 371–406.Google Scholar
  6. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and International Governance. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 485–556.Google Scholar
  7. Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147–158.Google Scholar
  8. Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197.Google Scholar
  9. Almeida, H. V., & Wolfenzon, D. (2006). A Theory of Pyramidal Ownership and Family Business Groups. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2637–2680.Google Scholar
  10. Amaral-Baptista, M. A., Klotzle, M. C., & de Melo, M. A. C. (2011). CEO Duality and Firm Performance in Brazil: Evidence from 2008. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 5(1), 24–37.Google Scholar
  11. Amrah, M. R., Hashim, H. A., & Ariff, A. M. (2015). The Moderating Effect of Family Control on the Relationship Between Board of Directors Effectiveness and Cost of Debt: Evidence from Oman. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 23(2), 217–239.Google Scholar
  12. Anderson, C. A., & Anthony, R. N. (1986). The New Corporate Directors: Insights for Board Members and Executives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding Family Ownership and Agency Cost of Debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 263–285.Google Scholar
  14. Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity, and the Cost of Debt. Journal of Accounting & Finance, 37(3), 315–342.Google Scholar
  15. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1328.Google Scholar
  16. Andringa, R. C., & Engstrom, T. W. (2012). The Nonprofit Board Answer Book: A Practical Guide for Board Members and Chief Executives (3rd ed.). San Francisco: BoardSource.Google Scholar
  17. Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2016). Governance of Higher Education: Global Perspectives, Theories and Practices (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Awan, S. H. (2012). Effect on Board Composition on Firm Performance: A Case of Pakistan Listed Companies. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(10), 853–863.Google Scholar
  19. Bainbridge, S. M. (1993). In Defence of the Shareholder Wealth Maximization Norm. Washington & Lee Law Review, 50, 1423–1447.Google Scholar
  20. Baker, C. R., & Owsen, D. M. (2002). Increasing the Role of Auditing in Corporate Governance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(5–6), 783–795.Google Scholar
  21. Baranchuk, N., & Dybvig, P. H. (2009). Consensus in Diverse Corporate Boards. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 715–747.Google Scholar
  22. Barnhart, S. W., Marr, M. W., & Rosenstein, S. (1994). Firm Performance and Board Composition: Some New Evidence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(4), 329–340.Google Scholar
  23. Baysinger, B., & Butler, H. (1985). Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Change in Board Composition. Journal of Law, 1, 101–124.Google Scholar
  24. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.Google Scholar
  25. Bédard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The Effect of Audit Committee Expertise, Independence, and Activity on Aggressive Earnings Management. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 13–35.Google Scholar
  26. Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Bertrand, M., Mehta, P., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). Ferreting Out Tunneling: An Application to Indian Business Groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 121–148.Google Scholar
  28. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. S. (1999). The Uncertain Relationship Between Board Composition and Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27(2), 231–243.Google Scholar
  29. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. S. (2002). The Non-correlation Between Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231–274.Google Scholar
  30. Bonazzi, L., & Islam, S. M. (2007). Agency Theory and Corporate Governance—A Study of the Effectiveness of Board in Their Monitoring of the CEO. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
  31. Bonn, I. (2004). Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Management & Organization, 10(1), 14–24.Google Scholar
  32. Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO Duality and Firm Performance: A Contingency Model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301–312.Google Scholar
  33. Braswell, M., Daniels, R. B., Landis, M., & Chang, C.-C. (2012). Characteristics of Diligent Audit Committees. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 10(4), 191–206.Google Scholar
  34. Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership Structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board. Journal of Finance, 3, 189–220.Google Scholar
  35. Burton, C. (1991). The Promise and the Price: Struggle for Equal Opportunity in Women’s Employment. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  36. Byrd, J., & Hickman, K. (1992). Do Outside Directors Monitor Managers? Evidence from Tender Offer Bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 195–221.Google Scholar
  37. Cadbury, A. (1992). The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee and Co.Google Scholar
  38. Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender Diversity in Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451.Google Scholar
  39. Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453–467.Google Scholar
  40. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. (2004). Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.Google Scholar
  41. Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The Strategic Context of External Network Ties: Examining the Impact of Director Appointment on Board Involvement in Strategic Decision Making. Academy of Management Journal, 4(4), 639–660.Google Scholar
  42. Carson, E. (2002). Factors Associated with the Development of Board Sub-Committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10(1), 4–18.Google Scholar
  43. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.Google Scholar
  44. Chambers, A. (2014). Chambers’ Corporate Governance Handbook (6th ed.). Haywards Heath: Bloomsbury Professional.Google Scholar
  45. Chen, C. J. P., & Jaggi, B. (2000). Association Between Independent Non-executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosure in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(4–5), 285–310.Google Scholar
  46. Chien, W.-W., Mayer, R. W., & Sennetti, J. T. (2010). Audit Committee Effectiveness in the Largest US Public Hospitals: An Empirical Study. Accounting & Taxation, 2(1), 107–127.Google Scholar
  47. Cho, D.-S., & Kim, J. (2007). Outside Directors, Ownership Structure and Firm Profitability in Korea. Corporate Governance an International Review, 15(2), 239–250.Google Scholar
  48. Chobpichien, J., Haron, H., & Ibrahim, D. (2008). The Quality of Board of Directors, Ownership Structure and Level of Voluntary Disclosure of Listed Companies in Thailand. Euro Asia Journal of Management, 17(1), 3–39.Google Scholar
  49. Christopher, J. (2010). Corporate Governance—A Multi-theoretical Approach to Recognising the Wider Influencing Forces Impacting on Organizations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21, 683–695.Google Scholar
  50. Conger, J., Finegold, D., & Lawler, E., III. (1998). Appraising Boardroom Performance. Harvard Business Review, 76, 136–148.Google Scholar
  51. Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental Disclosure Quality in Large German Companies: Economic Incentives, Public Pressures or Institutional Conditions? European Accounting View, 14(1), 3–39.Google Scholar
  52. Cox, T. H., & Black, S. (1991). Managing Cultural Diversity: Implications for Organizational Competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45–56.Google Scholar
  53. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1992). The Relationship Between Governance Structure and Corporate Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 375–386.Google Scholar
  54. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1997). CEO and Board Chairperson Roles Held Jointly or Separately: Much Ado About Nothing? The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 11–20.Google Scholar
  55. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2003). Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382.Google Scholar
  56. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. (1999). Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.Google Scholar
  57. Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. (1987). Composition and CEO Duality in Boards of Directors: An International Perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 18(3), 33–42.Google Scholar
  58. Dey, A. (2008, December). Corporate Governance and Agency Conflicts. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1143–1181.Google Scholar
  59. DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., & Houston, R. W. (2002). Audit Committees: How Good Are They? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 13(4), 53–59.Google Scholar
  60. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.Google Scholar
  61. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholders Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  62. Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35–54.Google Scholar
  63. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989, January). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  64. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.Google Scholar
  65. Essen, M. V., van Oosterhout, J. H., & Carney, M. (2012). Corporate Boards and the Performance of Asian Firms: A Meta-Analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 873–905.Google Scholar
  66. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.Google Scholar
  67. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.Google Scholar
  68. Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically Connected CEOs, Corporate Governance, and Post-IPO Performance of China’s Newly Partially Privatized Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.Google Scholar
  69. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to Corporate Boards: The Effect of Gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–106.Google Scholar
  70. Filatotchev, I., Jackson, G., & Kakajima, C. (2013). Corporate Governance and National Institutions: A Review and Emerging Research Agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 965–986.Google Scholar
  71. Finkelstein, S., & D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). CEO Duality as a Double-Edge Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079–1108.Google Scholar
  72. Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the Usual Suspects: How to Use Board Process to Make Boards Better. The Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 101–113.Google Scholar
  73. Fosberg, R. H. (1989). Outside Directors and Managerial Monitoring. Akron Business and Economic Review, 20, 24–32.Google Scholar
  74. Fosberg, R. H., & Nelson, M. R. (1999). Leadership Structure and Firm Performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 8(1), 83–96.Google Scholar
  75. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  76. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.Google Scholar
  78. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine, 13, 122–124.Google Scholar
  79. Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board Independence and Firm Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 460–465.Google Scholar
  80. Gabrielsson, J., Huse, M., & Minichilli, A. (2007). Understanding the Leadership Role of the Board Chairperson Through a Team Production Approach. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 21–39.Google Scholar
  81. Gary, R., Adams, C., & Owen, D. (1996). Accounting & Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. London and New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  82. Gillan, S. L. (2006). Recent Developments in Corporate Governance: A Overview. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 381–402.Google Scholar
  83. Goyal, V. K., & Park, C. W. (2002). Board Leadership Structure and CEO Turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  84. Guest, P. M. (2009). The Impact of Board Size on Firm Performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404.Google Scholar
  85. Guizani, M. (2013). The Moderating Effect of Large Shareholders on Board Structure-Firm Performance Relationship: An Agency Perspective. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development—An Open Access International Journal, 2, 64–73.Google Scholar
  86. Hall, B., & Liebman, J. (1998). Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 653–691.Google Scholar
  87. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7–8), 1034–1062.Google Scholar
  88. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2007). A Theory of Board Control and Size. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1797–1832.Google Scholar
  89. Hashim, A. H., & Devi, S. (2009). Board Characteristics, Ownership Structure and Earnings Quality: Malaysian Evidence. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 97–123.Google Scholar
  90. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1988). The Determinants of Board Composition. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589–606.Google Scholar
  91. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance. Financial Management, 20, 101–112.Google Scholar
  92. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.Google Scholar
  93. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 253–256.Google Scholar
  94. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependency Perspectives. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.Google Scholar
  95. Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and Creating Accountability: A Framework for Exploring Behavioural Perspectives of Corporate Governance. British Journal of Management, 16, S65–S79.Google Scholar
  96. Huse, M., Minichilli, A., & Schoning, M. (2005). Corporate Boards as Assets for Operating in the New Europe: The Value of Process-Oriented Boardroom Dynamics. Organizational Dynamics, 34(3), 285–297.Google Scholar
  97. Ingley, C. B., & Van der Walt, N. T. (2001). The Strategic Board: The Changing Role of Directors in Developing and Maintaining Corporate Capability. Corporate Governance an International Review, 9(3), 174–185.Google Scholar
  98. Irshad, R., Hashmi, S. H., Kausar, S., & Nazir, M. I. (2015). Board Effectiveness, Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 7(2), 46–60.Google Scholar
  99. Javed, A. Y., & Iqbal, R. (2006). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from Karachi Stock Exchange. The Pakistan Development Review, 45(4), 947–964.Google Scholar
  100. Javed, A. Y., & Iqbal, R. (2008). Ownership Concentration, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 47(4), 643–659.Google Scholar
  101. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.Google Scholar
  102. Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value Maximization, Stakeholders Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8–21.Google Scholar
  103. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.Google Scholar
  104. Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225–264.Google Scholar
  105. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438.Google Scholar
  106. Kallamu, B. S. (2016). Nomination Committee Attributes and Firm Performance: Evidence from Finance Companies in Malaysia. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 3(1), 150–165.Google Scholar
  107. Kang, E., & Zardkoohi, A. (2005). Board Leadership Structure and Firm Performance. Corporate Governance an International Review, 13(6), 785–799.Google Scholar
  108. Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate Governance and Board Composition: Diversity and Independence of Australian Boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 194–207.Google Scholar
  109. Karamanou, I., & Vafeas, K. (2005). The Association Between Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Management Earning Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 453–486.Google Scholar
  110. Kesner, I. F., Victor, B., & Lamont, B. T. (1986). Board Composition and the Commission of Illegal Acts: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies. The Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 789–799.Google Scholar
  111. Kholeif, A. (2008). CEO Duality and Accounting-Based Performance in Egyptian Listed Companies: A Re-examination of Agency Theory Predictions. Corporate Governance in Less Developed and Emerging Economies, 8, 65–96.Google Scholar
  112. Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board Composition and Corporate Performance: How the Australian Experience Informs Contrasting Theories of Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189–205.Google Scholar
  113. Klein, A. (2002). Audit Committee, Board of Directors Characteristics, and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 375–400.Google Scholar
  114. Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2008). Does the SOX Definition of an Accounting Expert Matter? The Association Between Audit Committee Directors’ Accounting Expertise and Accounting Conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 827–858.Google Scholar
  115. Lechem, B. (2002). Chairman of the Board: A Practical Guide. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  116. Letendre, L. (2004). The Dynamics of the Boardroom. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 101–104.Google Scholar
  117. Levrau, A., & Van den Berghe, L. A. A. (2007). Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness: Beyond Formalism. The ICFAI Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(4), 58–85.Google Scholar
  118. Lim, R. (2011). Are Corporate Governance Attributes Associated with Accounting Conservatism? Accounting & Finance, 54(4), 1007–1030.Google Scholar
  119. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Layer, 8, 59–77.Google Scholar
  120. Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  121. Mace, M. L. G. (1971). Directors: Myth and Reality. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  122. Malik, N. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility and Development in Pakistan. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  123. Mallin, C. A. (2007). Corporate Governance (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  124. Martin, A. D., & Hadley, D. J. (2006). Corporate Environmental Non-reporting—A UK FTSE 350 Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(4), 245–259.Google Scholar
  125. McDonald, D., & Puxty, A. G. (1979). An Inducement-Contribution Approach to Corporate Financial Reporting. Accounting, Organisation and Society, 4(1–2), 53–65.Google Scholar
  126. McIntyre, M. L., Murphy, S. A., & Mitchell, P. (2007). The Top Team: Examining Board Composition and Firm Performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(5), 547–561.Google Scholar
  127. Miko, N. U., & Kamardin, H. (2015). Impact of Audit Committee and Audit Quality on Preventing Earnings Management in the Pre- and Post-Nigerian Corporate Governance Code 2011. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172(27), 651–657.Google Scholar
  128. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups. The Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433.Google Scholar
  129. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  130. Mizruchi, M. S. (1983). Who Controls Whom? An Examination of the Relation Between Management and Board of Directors in Large American Corporation. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 426–435.Google Scholar
  131. Molz, R. (1988). Managerial Domination of Boards of Directors and Financial Performance. Journal of Business Research, 16(3), 235–249.Google Scholar
  132. Müller, V.-O. (2014). The Impact of Board Composition on the Financial Performance of FTSE100 Constituents. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 969–975.Google Scholar
  133. Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). Breakthrough Board Performance: How to Harness Your Board’s Intellectual Capital. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 4(1), 2–23.Google Scholar
  134. Ntim, C. G., & Osei, K. A. (2011). The Impact of Corporate Board Meetings on Corporate Performance in South Africa. African Review of Economics and Finance, 2(2), 83–103.Google Scholar
  135. O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 21–37.Google Scholar
  136. Owens-Jackson, L. A., Robinson, D., & Shelton, S. W. (2009). The Association Between Audit Committee Characteristics, the Contracting Process and Fraudulent Financial Reporting. American Journal of Business, 24(1), 57–66.Google Scholar
  137. Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1991). The Relative Power of CEOs and Boards of Directors: Associations with Corporate Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 135–153.Google Scholar
  138. Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438.Google Scholar
  139. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and Its Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218–228.Google Scholar
  140. Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, Composition and Function of Hospital Board of Directors: A Study of Organization-Environment Linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 349–364.Google Scholar
  141. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  142. Pi, L., & Timme, S. G. (1993). Corporate Control and Bank Efficiency. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17(2–3), 515–530.Google Scholar
  143. Pomeroy, B., & Thornton, D. B. (2008). Meta-Analysis and the Accounting Literature: The Case of Audit Committee Independence and Financial Reporting Quality. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 305–330.Google Scholar
  144. Pye, A., & Pettigrew, A. (2005). Studying Board Context, Process and Dynamics: Some Challenges for the Future. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
  145. Raheja, C. G. (2005). Determinants of Board Size and Composition: A Theory of Corporate Boards. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(2), 283–306.Google Scholar
  146. Ranti, U. O. (2013). The Effects of Board Size and CEO Duality on Firms’ Capital Structure: A Study of Selected Listed Firms in Nigeria. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(8), 1033–1043.Google Scholar
  147. Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO Duality and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160.Google Scholar
  148. Rhoades, D. L., Rechner, P. L., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2001). A Meta-Analysis of Board Leadership Structure and Financial Performance: Are “Two Heads Better Than One”? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 3(October), 311–319.Google Scholar
  149. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a Business Case for Diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21–31.Google Scholar
  150. Saleh, N. M., Iskandar, T. M., & Rahmat, M. M. (2007). Audit Committee Characteristics and Earnings Management: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(2), 147–163.Google Scholar
  151. Sanders, W. G., & Carpenter, M. A. (1998). Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 158–178.Google Scholar
  152. Schellenger, M. H., Wood, D. D., & Tashakori, A. (1989). Board of Director Composition, Shareholder Wealth, and Dividend Policy. Journal of Management, 15(3), 457–467.Google Scholar
  153. Sharma, V. D., Sharma, D. S., & Ananthanarayanan, U. (2011). Client Importance and Earnings Management: The Moderating Role of Audit Committees. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 125–156.Google Scholar
  154. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461–488.Google Scholar
  155. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.Google Scholar
  156. Singh, J. V., House, R. J., & Tucker, D. J. (1986). Organizational Change and Organizational Mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 587–611.Google Scholar
  157. Smith, I. G. (2012). Chief Executive Pay and Remuneration Committee Independence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 510–531.Google Scholar
  158. Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2002). What Makes Great Boards Great. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 106–133.Google Scholar
  159. Sridharan, U. V., & Marsinko, A. (1997). CEO Duality in the Paper and Forest Products Industry. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 10(1), 59–65.Google Scholar
  160. Tarus, D. K. (2013). Diversity in the Board Room: A Business Case or Rhetoric? In A. Ravindran & F. Shirazi (Eds.), Business Review: Advanced Applications (pp. 109–138). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  161. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board Meeting Frequency and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 113–142.Google Scholar
  162. Van den Berghe, L. A., & Baelden, T. (2005). The Monitoring Role of the Board: One Approach Does Not Fit All. Corporate Governance an International Review, 13(15), 680–690.Google Scholar
  163. Van der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board Dynamics and the Influence of Professional Background, Gender and Ethnic Diversity of Directors. Corporate Governance an International Review, 11(3), 218–234.Google Scholar
  164. Wangomobe, D. K. (2013). Multi-theoretical Perspective of Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Literature Review. Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research, 2(2), 655–671.Google Scholar
  165. Wellalage, N. H., & Locke, S. (2013). Women on Board, Firm Financial Performance and Agency Costs. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2, 113–127.Google Scholar
  166. Willis, A. (1989). Corporate Governance and Management of Information and Records. Records Management Journal, 15(2), 86–97.Google Scholar
  167. Yang, T., & Zhao, S. (2014). CEO Duality and Firm Performance: Evidence from an Exogenous Shock to the Competitive Environment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 49, 534–552.Google Scholar
  168. Yasser, Q. R., & Mamum, A. A. (2015). Effect of Ownership Concentration on Firm Performance: Pakistan Evidence. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 9(2), 162–176.Google Scholar
  169. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–212.Google Scholar
  170. Yin, F., Gao, S., Li, W., & Lv, H. (2012). Determinants of Audit Committee Meeting Frequency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(4), 425–444.Google Scholar
  171. Yusoff, W. F., & Alhaji, A. A. (2012). Insight of Corporate Governance Theories. Journal of Business & Management, 1(1), 52–63.Google Scholar
  172. Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Board of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334.Google Scholar
  173. Zattoni, A., Douglas, T., & Judge, W. (2013). Developing Corporate Governance Theory Through Qualitative Research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 119–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LondonUK
  2. 2.Dubai Business SchoolUniversity of DubaiDubaiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations