Advertisement

The Development of DISC (Decision Integration for Strong Communities): An Agile Software Application of Sustainability Indicators for Small and Rural Communities

  • Kevin SummersEmail author
  • Viccy Salazar
  • Dave Olszyk
  • Linda Harwell
  • Allen Brookes
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being book series (CQLWB)

Abstract

Small towns and rural communities, like many larger cities, are looking for ways to strengthen their economies, improve quality of life, and build on local assets. They are seeking to create their own path to sustainability that fits their size, geography, and resources and also preserves their distinctive characteristics. To address this need, the Decision Integration for Strong Communities (DISC) application was developed to offer relevant information curated to assist smaller communities with addressing their sustainability goals. To ensure DISC is useful to a variety of smaller and rural communities, EPA project staff reached out to small numbers of interested communities and potential users at different steps of the development process. In late 2019, the DISC application was beta tested by potential users and is now downloadable upon request to collaborating communities.

Keywords

Community DISC Sustainability Software Decision Agile process Smart growth Sustainable development Livability Resilience Adaptation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the following for their contributions to the successful development and execution of the DISC downloadable application.

EPA Region 10: Bruce Duncan, Karl Pepple, Charles Bert

EPA ORD: Melissa McCullough, Kurt Wolfe, Rajbir Parmar, Lisa Smith

ORISE/ORAU at EPA ORD: Vivian Phan, Seth Jenkins, Connor Thorson, Courtney McMillion, Paul Dunken, Kristi Swisher

EPA OCR: Alexis Rourk, Stephanie Bertaina.

References

  1. ACS (American Community Survey). (2015). United States Census. American Community Survey. https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/data-profiles/2015/.
  2. Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Tsarchopoulos, P., & Panori, A. (2017). Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9, 146–169.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, L., Smith, J. L., & Wright, P. A. (2015). Where are poor people to live?: Transforming public housing communities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bostock, M., Ogievetsky, V., Heer, J. (2011). D3 data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2301–2309.Google Scholar
  5. Burstin, H., Leatherman, S., & Goldman, D. (2016). The evolution of healthcare quality measurement in the United States. Journal of Internal Medicine, 279, 154–159.Google Scholar
  6. Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2019). Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Cheltenham, England: Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). (2019). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system: Survey data & documentation. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/data_documentation/index.htm.
  8. Ciccullo, F., Pero, M., Caridi, M., Gosling, J., & Purvis, L. (2018). Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: A literature review and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2336–2350.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., Gertler, M. S., & Wojcik, D. (2018). The new oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, M., & Ford, D. (2003). Introducing an agile process to an organization. IEEE Computer. http://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/articles/introducing-an-agile-process-to-an-organization.
  11. Congress of the New Urbanism. (1999). Charter of the new urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Dale, A. (2001). At the edge: Sustainable development in the 21st century. Vancouver, British Columbia: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  13. De Vaus, D. (2002). Analyzing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Dingsoyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. The Journal of Systems and Software, 85, 1213–1221.Google Scholar
  15. Douthit, N., Kiv, S., Dwolatzky, T., & Biswas, S. (2015). Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health, 129, 6011–620.Google Scholar
  16. Duffin, E. (2019). Number of U.S. cities, town villages by population size 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/241695/number-of-us-cities-towns-villages-by-population-size/.
  17. Einstein, K. L., & Glick, D. M. (2017). Does race affect access to governmental services? An experiment exploring street-level bureaucrats and access to public housing. American Journal of Political Science, 61, 100–116.Google Scholar
  18. Ellis, B. H., & Abdi, S. M. (2017). Building community resilience to violent extremism through genuine partnerships. American Psychologist, 72, 289–300.Google Scholar
  19. Flumerfelt, S., Siriban-Manalang, A. B., & Kahlen, F. (2012). Are agile and lean manufacturing systems employing sustainability, complexity and organizational learning? The Learning Organization, 19, 238–247.Google Scholar
  20. Fulford, R. S., Smith, L. M., Harwell, M., Dantin, D., Russell, M., & Harvey, J. (2015). Human well-being differs by community type: Toward reference points in a human well-being indicator useful for decision making. Ecological Indicators, 56, 194–204.Google Scholar
  21. Fulgram, C., Johnson, J., Crandall, M., Jackson, L., & Burrows, N. (2011). The FBI gets agile. IT Professional, 13, 57–59.Google Scholar
  22. Groenewegen, P. P., van der Berg, A. E., de Vries, S., & Verheij, R. A. (2006). Vitamin G: Effect of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. BMC Public Health, 6, 149–158.Google Scholar
  23. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning, shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke, England: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  24. Hendricks, M. D., Meyer, M. A., Gharaibeh, N. G., Van Zandt, S., Masterson, J., Cooper, J. T., Jr., et al. (2018). The development of a participatory assessment technique for infrastructure: Neighborhood-level monitoring towards sustainable infrastructure systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 265–274.Google Scholar
  25. Hossain, E., Babar, M. A., Paik, H. Y., & Verner, J. (2009). Risk identification and mitigation processes for using scrum in global software development: A conceptual framework. 16th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference 2009, pp. 457–464. IEEE.Google Scholar
  26. Hossain, E., Bannerman, P. L., & Jeffery, D. R. (2011). Scrum practices in global software development: A research framework. International conference on product focused software process improvement. 2011, pp. 88–102. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Husar, R., & Poirot, R. (2005). DataFed and Fastnet: Tools for agile air quality analysis. Environmental Manager, 2005, 39–41.Google Scholar
  28. Ioppolo, G., Cucurachi, S., Salomone, R., Saija, G., & Shi, L. (2016). Sustainable local development and environmental governance: A strategic planning experience. Sustainability, 8, 180.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, C. (2008). Development practices for small software applications. CrossTalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 21, 9–13.Google Scholar
  30. Koirala, B. P., Koliou, E., Hakvoort, R. A., & Herder, P. M. (2016). Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 722–744.Google Scholar
  31. Lawrence, R. L., & Wright, A. (2001). Rule-based classification systems using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 1137–1142.Google Scholar
  32. Ling, C., Hanna, K., & Dale, A. (2009). A template for integrated community sustainability planning. Environmental Management, 44, 228–242.Google Scholar
  33. Mascarenhas, A., Coelho, P., Subtil, E., & Ramos, T. B. (2010). The role of common local indicators in regional sustainability assessment. Ecological Indicators, 10, 646–656.Google Scholar
  34. McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with nature. Garden City, NY: The Nature History Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mergel, I. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 516–523.Google Scholar
  36. Moreira, M. (2010). Adapting configuration management for agile teams: Balancing sustainability and speed. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Northern, C., Mayfield, K., Benito, R., & Casagni, M. (2010). Handbook for implementing agile in department of defense information technology acquisition (Technical Report No. MTR-100489). MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a546756.pdf.
  38. Paetsch, F., Eberlein, A., & Maurer, F. (2003). Requirements engineering and agile software development. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pp. 308–313. IEEE The Computer SocietyGoogle Scholar
  39. Pandeya, B., Buytaert, W., Zulkafli, Z., Karpouzoglou, T., Mao, F., & Hannah, D. M. (2016). A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scare regions. Ecosystem Services, 22, 250–259.Google Scholar
  40. Reed, M. S., Fraser, E. D. G., & Dougill, A. J. (2006). An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics, 59, 406–418.Google Scholar
  41. Register, R. (2006). Ecocities: rebuilding cities in balance with nature (Revised ed.). Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Sanchez, J. C., Williams, L., Maximilien, E. M. (2007). On the sustained use of a test-driven development practice at IBM. In Proceedings of Agile 2007, Washington, D.C., pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
  43. Selman, P. (1993). Landscape ecology and countryside planning—Vision, theory, and practice. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, 1–21.Google Scholar
  44. Sisneros-Kidd, A. M., Monz, C., Hausner, V., Schmidt, J., & Clark, D. (2019). Nature-based tourism, resource dependence and resilience in Arctic communities: Framing complex issues in a changing environment. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27, 12259–1276.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, L. M., Case, J. L., Harwell, L. C., Smith, H. M., & Summers, J. K. (2013). Development of relative importance values as contribution weights for evaluating human well-being: An ecosystem services example. Human Ecology, 41, 631–641.Google Scholar
  46. Summers, J. K., Smith, L. M., Harwell, L. C., Case, J. L., Wade, C. M., Straub, K. R., et al. (2014). An index of human well-being for the U.S.: A trio approach. Sustainability, 6, 3915–3935.Google Scholar
  47. Summers, J. K., Harwell, L. C., & Smith, L. M. (2016). A model for change: An approach for forecasting well-being from service-based decisions. Ecological Indicators, 69, 295–309.Google Scholar
  48. Summers, J. K., Smith, L. M., Harwell, L. C., & Buck, K. D. (2017). Conceptualizing holistic community resilience to climate events: Foundation for a climate resilience screening index. GeoHealth, 1, 151–164.Google Scholar
  49. Summers, J. K., Harwell, L. C., Smith, L. M., & Buck, K. D. (2018). Measuring community resilience to natural hazards: The Natural Hazard Resilience Screening Index (NaHRSI)—Development and application to the United States. GeoHealth, 2, 372–394.Google Scholar
  50. Thiault, L., Marshall, P., Gelcich, S., Collin, A., Chlous, F., & Claudet, J. (2018). Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to inform local decision making. Conservation Biology, 32, 447–456.Google Scholar
  51. Tippet, J. (2005). Participatory planning in river catchments, an innovative toolkit tested in South Africa and North West England. Water Science Technology, 52, 95–105.Google Scholar
  52. Wackernagel, M., Kitzes, J., Moran, D., Goldfinger, S., & Thoman, M. (2006). The Ecological Footprint of cities and regions: Comparing resource availability with resource demand. Environment and Urbanisation, 18, 103–112.Google Scholar
  53. Wang, X. (2011). The combination of agile and lean in software development: An experience report analysis. 2011 Agile Conference, pp. 1–9. IEEE, 2011. https://ulir.ul.ie/bitstream/handle/10344/1705/2011_Wang.pdf?sequence=2.
  54. Wang, X., Conboy, K., & Cawley, O. (2012). “Leagile” software development: An experience report analysis of the application of lean approaches in agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85, 1287–1299.Google Scholar
  55. Wates, N. (2000). The community planning handbook. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  56. Wayland, R. A, Dye, T. S. (2005). AIRNOW: America’s Resource for Real-Time and Forecasted Air Quality Information; Environmental Manager, pp. 19–27.Google Scholar
  57. Wrubel, E., & Gross, J. (2015). Contracting for Agile Software Development in the Department of Defense: An introduction. Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-2015-TN-006. Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1046628.pdf.
  58. Zubizarreta, I., Seravalli A., & Arrizabalaga, S. (2015). Smart city concept: What it is and what it should be. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000282.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Summers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Viccy Salazar
    • 2
  • Dave Olszyk
    • 3
  • Linda Harwell
    • 1
  • Allen Brookes
    • 3
  1. 1.US EPA, Office of Research and Development, CEMM/GEMMDGulf BreezeUSA
  2. 2.US EPASeattleUSA
  3. 3.US EPA, Office of Research and Development, CPHEA/PESDCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations