Superhydrophobic Coatings and Artificial Neural Networks: Design, Development and Optimization

  • Francesco MarrafinoEmail author
  • Pio Iannelli
  • Miriam Di Martino
  • Simona Concilio
  • Stefano Piotto
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Bioengineering book series (LNBE)


Recently, considerable attention has been devoted to the development of superhydrophobic surfaces due to their advantageous antifouling and antimicrobial capacity. While significant effort has been devoted to fabricating such surfaces, very few polymeric superhydrophobic surfaces can be considered durable against various externally imposed stresses. Pyrogenic hydrophobic silica nanoparticles were used to confer superhydrophobic properties to the coatings. 450 samples were prepared using a layer-by-layer approach, deposing an epoxy resin or PDMS layer as adhesive on a substrate (PC/ABS), followed by one or more layers of silica nanoparticles, or silica-resin mixed layers. The best coating obtained shows a contact angle of 157° and a tape peeling grade resistance. The applied method involves the spray deposition of a multilayer coating composed of: silica layer/epoxy resin layer/silica layer, followed by partial curing of the coating (15 min, 70 °C); another silica layer is then sprayed on the surface and is cured for 10 min. Given the high number of parameters involved, process optimization is quite tricky. Artificial Neural Networks are the best tool to deal with multivariate analysis problems and for this reason, data from all the prepared samples were collected into a matrix and was used to train a neural network capable of predicting the degree of hydrophobicity of a silica nanoparticles-based coating.


Neural network Superhydrophobic surface Antifouling 


  1. 1.
    Zhang, X., Wang, L., Levanen, E.: Superhydrophobic surfaces for the reduction of bacterial adhesion. RSC Adv. 3(30), 12003–12020 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Piotto, S., Concilio, S., Sessa, L., Iannelli, P., Porta, A., Calabrese, E.C., et al.: Novel antimicrobial polymer films active against bacteria and fungi. Polym. Compos. 34(9), 1489–1492 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piotto, S., Concilio, S., Sessa, L., Diana, R., Torrens, G., Juan, C., et al.: Synthesis and antimicrobial studies of new antibacterial azo-compounds active against staphylococcus aureus and listeria monocytogenes. Molecules 22(8), 1372 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Piotto, S., Di Biasi, L., Sessa, L., Concilio, S.: Transmembrane peptides as sensors of the membrane physical state. Front. Phys. 6, 48 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Concilio, S., Sessa, L., Petrone, A.M., Porta, A., Diana, R., Iannelli, P., et al.: Structure modification of an active azo-compound as a route to new antimicrobial compounds. Molecules 22(6), 875 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Concilio, S., Iannelli, P., Sessa, L., Olivieri, R., Porta, A., De Santis, F., et al.: Biodegradable antimicrobial films based on poly(lactic acid) matrices and active azo compounds. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132(33) (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clauss-Lendzian, E., Vaishampayan, A., de Jong, A., Landau, U., Meyer, C., Kok, J., et al.: Stress response of a clinical Enterococcus faecalis isolate subjected to a novel antimicrobial surface coating. Microbiol. Res. 207, 53–64 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gwisai, T., Hollingsworth, N.R., Cowles, S., Tharmalingam, N., Mylonakis, E., Fuchs, B.B., et al.: Repurposing niclosamide as a versatile antimicrobial surface coating against device-associated, hospital-acquired bacterial infections. Biomed. Mater. 12(4), 045010 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, X.-F., Zhao, J.-P., Hu, J.-M.: Abrasion-resistant, hot water-repellent and self-cleaning superhydrophobic surfaces fabricated by electrophoresis of nanoparticles in electrodeposited sol-gel films. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 4(13), 1700177 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Genzer, J., Efimenko, K.: Recent developments in superhydrophobic surfaces and their relevance to marine fouling: a review. Biofouling 22(5), 339–360 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crick, C.R., Ismail, S., Pratten, J., Parkin, I.P.: An investigation into bacterial attachment to an elastomeric superhydrophobic surface prepared via aerosol assisted deposition. Thin Solid Films 519(11), 3722–3727 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Privett, B.J., Youn, J., Hong, S.A., Lee, J., Han, J., Shin, J.H., et al.: Antibacterial fluorinated silica colloid superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir: ACS J. Surf. Colloids 27(15), 9597–9601 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lima, A.C., Mano, J.F.: Micro-/nano-structured superhydrophobic surfaces in the biomedical field: part I: basic concepts and biomimetic approaches. Nanomedicine 10(1), 103–119 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lima, A.C., Mano, J.F.: Micro/nano-structured superhydrophobic surfaces in the biomedical field: part II: applications overview. Nanomedicine 10(2), 271–297 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guo, Z., Liu, W., Su, B.-L.: Superhydrophobic surfaces: from natural to biomimetic to functional. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 353(2), 335–355 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ellinas, K., Tserepi, A., Gogolides, E.: Durable superhydrophobic and superamphiphobic polymeric surfaces and their applications: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 250, 132–157 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dettre, R.H., Johnson, R.E.: Contact angle hysteresis contact angle, wettability, and adhesion. Adv. Chem.: Am. Chem. Soc. 43, 136–144 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barthlott, W., Neinhuis, C.: Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202(1), 1–8 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, Z.-H., Wang, H.-J., Liang, Y.-H., Li, X.-J., Ren, L.-Q., Cui, Z.-Q., et al.: One-step fabrication of robust superhydrophobic and superoleophilic surfaces with self-cleaning and oil/water separation function. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 3869 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scarratt, L.R.J., Steiner, U., Neto, C.: A review on the mechanical and thermodynamic robustness of superhydrophobic surfaces. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 246, 133–152 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anastasakis, L., Mort, N.: The development of self-organization techniques in modelling: a review of the group method of data handling (GMDH). Res. Rep.-Univ. Sheffield Depart. Autom. Control Syst. Eng. (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Copyright 2009–2020 © GMDH, LLC.
  23. 23.
    Chen, Y.-Y., Lin, Y.-H., Kung, C.-C., Chung, M.-H., Yen, I.H.: Design and implementation of cloud analytics-assisted smart power meters considering advanced artificial intelligence as edge analytics in demand-side management for smart homes. Sens. (Basel). 19(9), 2047 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Russell, S.J.: Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Pearson, Harlow (2016)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J.: Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088), 533–536 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Marrafino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pio Iannelli
    • 1
  • Miriam Di Martino
    • 1
  • Simona Concilio
    • 2
  • Stefano Piotto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PharmacyUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly

Personalised recommendations