Research and Knowledge Exchange
- 21 Downloads
How do research discoveries contribute more strongly to knowledge exchange and potentially innovation?
Researchers make discoveries at the frontiers of knowledge—often revealing phenomena or truths that were previously unknown or unexplained.
Discoveries that can be exchanged include new knowledge, facts, theories, analyses, and predictions, in single disciplines or across disciplines.
Knowledge is shared with research peers and more broadly. It is exchanged through discussions, publications, joint projects, and personnel exchanges. Graduates take new knowledge into their future work.
The potential for discoveries to become more impactful and lead to innovation depends on the choice of the research topic, how the research is conducted, what partners are involved, and how results are exchanged.
Pursuing fundamental discoveries along a spectrum from curiosity-driven to use-inspired that impact both scholarship and society.
Collaborating within and across disciplines in search for new high-impact cross-disciplinary discoveries and fields of thought.
Empowering large-scale Centres of Research, Education, and Innovation to find directly implementable solutions to the pressing issues of society.
Energizing research by engaging undergraduate and postgraduate students, preparing them as agents of knowledge exchange.
KeywordsResearch Discoveries Knowledge exchange Innovation Frontiers of knowledge New knowledge Interdisciplinary Cross-disciplinary Fundamentals Curiosity-driven Use-inspired Collaboration Centres Implementable solutions Students Agents
- 1.Cambrige-MIT Institute (2008) Accelerating innovation by crossing boundaries 2000–2006Google Scholar
- 2.Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 3.Brooks H (1968) The government of science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- 4.Conant JB (1951) Science and common sense, 16th edn. Yale University Press, New Heaven, CTGoogle Scholar
- 5.Conant JB (1947) On understanding science. Yale University Press, New Heaven, CTGoogle Scholar
- 6.Owen-Smith J (2018) Research universities and the public good: discovery for an uncertain future. Stanford Business Books, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
- 7.Dowling DA (2005) The Dowling review of business-university research collaborations. Royal Academy of EngineeringGoogle Scholar
- 9.Cummings JN, Kiesler S (2008) Who collaborates successfully?: Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Eupported Cooperative Work. San Diego, CA, pp 437–446Google Scholar
- 11.Galison P (1997) Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- 12.National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine (2005) Facilitating interdisciplinary research. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (2019) 70 years of Fraunhofer: 70 years of future. Munich, Germany. https://www.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/zv/en/Publications/Annual-Report/2018/Fraunhofer-Annual-Report-2018.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2020
- 15.National Academy of Engineering (2017) NAE grand challenges for engineering, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar