Advertisement

Developing an Educational Framework for Using WhatsApp Based on Social Constructivism Theory

  • Noor Al-QaysiEmail author
  • Norhisham Mohamad-Nordin
  • Mostafa Al-Emran
Chapter
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 295)

Abstract

Social media applications are one of the promising tools in facilitating the educational process. Among these applications, WhatsApp was recently suggested as one of the most popular applications used by students. However, there is a scarce of a framework that can fully utilize the WhatsApp for educational purposes. To bridge this gap and to draw upon the social constructivism framework, the aim of this study is to develop a social constructivism framework for WhatsApp (SCFW) that enables both formal (in-class) and informal (off-class) learning environment. The SCFW framework is based on the principle that educators can use WhatsApp closed groups to enable learners to construct and share knowledge with their peers. This has been accomplished through the integration of four aspects, including device aspect, social aspect, learner aspect, and teacher aspect.

Keywords

Educational framework WhatsApp Social constructivism theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Salloum, S.A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K.: Mining text in news channels: a case study from Facebook. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud. 1(1), 1–9 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salloum, S.A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K.: The impact of knowledge sharing on information systems: a review. In: International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, pp. 94–106 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., Al-Emran, M.: A systematic review of social media acceptance from the perspective of educational and information systems theories and models. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 57(8), 2085–2109 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kong, X.L., Kongkasem, S., Teplitsky, F., Khoo, B.K.S.: Mobilizing learning in higher education: developments in teaching and learning practice. In: Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M.A.: Understanding the differences in students’ attitudes towards social media use: a case study from Oman. In: 2019 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), pp. 176–179 (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Qaysi, N., Al-Emran, M.: Code-switching usage in social media: a case study from Oman. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud. 1(1), 25–38 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., Al-Emran, M.: An empirical investigation of students’ attitudes towards the use of social media in Omani heducation. In: International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, pp. 350–359 (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., Al-Emran, M.: What leads to social learning? Students’ attitudes towards using social media applications in Omani higher education. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2019)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koole, M.L.: Mobile learning—A model for framing mobile learning. Mob. Learn. Transform. Deliv. Educ. Train. (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rhodes, L.K., Bellamy, G.T.: Choices and consequences in the renewal of teacher education. J. Teach. Educ. 50(1), 17–26 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rambe, P., Bere, A.: Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. Br. J. Educ. Technol. (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kearsley, G.: The nature and value of interaction in distance education. In: Distance Education Symposium 3: Instruction (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the user interface : strategies for effective human-computer interaction (5th Ed.).. In: Proceedings 2006 AVI Work. BEyond time errors Nov. Eval. methods Inf. Vis. - BELIV’06 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R.: How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Preece, H.S., Rogers, J.Y.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mathis, C.: What are supports and barriers to using social constructivism and the reggio emilia approach in state funded preschool programs in California? (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mcmahon, M.: Social constructivism and the World Wide Web—A paradigm for learning. In: What Works And Why : Reflections on Learning with Technology, pp. 1–7, ASCILITE (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, B.: Social constructivism. In: Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology, pp. 55–61 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ernest, P.: Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. SUNY Ser. Sci. Technol. Soc. xiv, 315 (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1978)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tharp, R.G., Gallimore, R.: Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. Cambridge University Press (1991)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moore, M.G.: Three types of interaction. Am. J. Distance Educ. (1989)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barker, P.: Designing interactive learning. Des. Prod. Multimed. Simul.-Based Learn. Mater. 1–30 (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith P.L., Ragan, T.J.: Instructional Design. Wiley (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Farmer, J.A., Buckmaster, A., LeGrand, B.: Cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for continuing professional education. New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ. 55, 41–49 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reigeluth, C.M., Squire, K.: Emerging work on the new paradigm of instructional theories. Educ. Technol. (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dabbagh, N., Bannan-Ritland, B.: Online Learning: Concepts, Strategies, and Application. Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brown, T.H.: Beyond constructivism : exploring future learning paradigms. Educ. Today 2(2), 1–11 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Al-Emran, M., Malik, S.I.: The impact of Google Apps at work: higher educational perspective. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 10(4), 85–88 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Salloum, S.A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K.: Mining social media text: extracting knowledge from Facebook. Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst. 6(2), 73–81 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salloum, S.A., Mhamdi, C., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K.: Analysis and classification of Arabic Newspapers’ Facebook pages using text mining techniques. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud. 1(2), 8–17 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noor Al-Qaysi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Norhisham Mohamad-Nordin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mostafa Al-Emran
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Art, Computing and Creative IndustryUniversiti Pendidikan Sultan IdrisTanjung MalimMalaysia
  2. 2.College of Economics, Management and Information SystemsUniversity of NizwaNizwaOman
  3. 3.Department of Information TechnologyAl Buraimi University CollegeAl BuraimiOman

Personalised recommendations