Advertisement

How Much Might a Beer Cost in a Fancy Resort? A Possible Replication of Thaler’s Well-Known Experiment

  • Anita Kolnhofer-DerecskeiEmail author
Chapter
  • 23 Downloads
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

This chapter starts with an experiment which was originally presented by Thaler in 1985. In the experiment, Thaler wanted to test the standard economic thinking whereby actors should pay for a product according to the utility that they get out of it. These utilities are based on stable preferences which are expressed in buyers’ reservation prices. He asked participants how much they would authorise a friend to pay to get them a beer whilst they stayed on the beach. Even though the beer bought by the friend would be the same regardless of where it was purchased, subjects who were told that the only nearby supplier was a fancy resort hotel were ready to pay significantly more and overpriced the product dramatically. In this study, this famous pricing experiment was retested on a sample population of Romanian and Hungarian students. Times have changed compared to the original American samples; in this case, the respondents are from Europe where subjects are used to their own domestic prices in their national currencies. Even so, our participants also highly overpriced the beer. Partly this was due to the situation—the hypothetical environment confused their decision; the different currencies at play were also partly responsible. It means that subjects’ preferences and expected reservation prices are not as stable as assumed by mainstream theory. This study aims not only to understand how everyday actors would price a beer on a hot summer’s day, but provides a deeper insight into the economic concept of “price”. The definition of price is sourced from mainstream economic assumptions, which move and motivate consumers’ decisions and market behaviours. From an economic viewpoint, various prices can be defined such as market price or reservation price. Here, the reference price is widely studied and compared with the reservation price. The paper starts and finishes with behavioural economics experiments as the main empirical research method; the current description of the subject matter and literature are reviewed afterwards. It suggests that the consumer surplus which relies on preferences is confused by various situations in the framework of behavioural economics, such as different environments or currencies.

Keywords

Prices Reference price Market price Reservation price Consumer surplus Framing Currencies 

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G. A. (2001). Behavioral macroeconomics and macroeconomic behavior. Nobel Prize Lecture, 8th of December 2001. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/akerlof-lecture.pdf.
  3. Anderson, P., Møller, L., & Galea, G. (2012). Alcohol in the European Union consumption, harm and policy approaches. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from http://www.euro.who.int/.
  4. Ariely, D. (2010). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  5. Banca Nationalá Romániei. (2019). Exchange rates, monthly, quarterly and annual averages. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.bnr.ro/Exchange-Rates%2D%2D3727.aspx.
  6. Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33–47.  https://doi.org/10.1037/t13084-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolton, L. E., & Alba, J. W. (2006). Price fairness: Good-service differences and the role of vendor costs. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 258–265.  https://doi.org/10.1086/506306.
  8. Camerer, C. F. (1992). The rationality of prices and volume in experimental markets. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 237–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90013-W.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114(3), 517–537.  https://doi.org/10.1086/503550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315–372.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeMerritt, P. (2017). A historical look at the price of beer. ShowBizCheatsheet. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.cheatsheet.com/culture/a-historical-look-at-the-price-of-beer.html/.
  12. Friedman, M. (2007). Price theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Charlton, J., & Ranyard, R. (2002). Euro illusion: Psychological insights into price evaluations with a unitary currency. European Psychologist, 7(4), 302–311.  https://doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.7.4.302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenlaw, S. A., & Shapiro, D. (2017). Principles of microeconomics (2nd ed.). TX: OpenStax.Google Scholar
  15. Hoeffler, S., & Ariely, D. (1999). Constructing stable preferences: A look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(2), 113–139.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0802_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Institutul National de Statistica. (2019). Buletin statistic de preţuri nr.10/2018. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from http://www.insse.ro/cms/ro/content/buletin-statistic-de-pre%C5%A3uri-nr102018.
  17. Isaac, R. M., & Plott, C. R. (1981). Price controls and the behavior of auction markets: An experimental examination. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 448–459.Google Scholar
  18. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  19. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 728–741.Google Scholar
  20. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal. (2019). Egyes termékek és szolgáltatások éves fogyasztói átlagára. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_eves/i_qsf003b.html.
  22. Leibbrandt, A. (2016). Behavioral constraints on pricing: Experimental evidence on price discrimination and customer antagonism. CESifo Working Paper Series 6214, CESifo Group Munich.Google Scholar
  23. Lichtenstein, D. R., Bloch, P. H., & Black, W. C. (1988). Correlates of price acceptability. The Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 243–252.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Magyar Nemzeti Bank. (2019). Az MNB legfrissebb hivatalos devizaárfolyamai. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://www.mnb.hu/arfolyamok.
  25. Majerova, J., Sroka, W., Krizanova, A., Gajanova, L., & Nadanyiova, M. (2020). Sustainable brand management of alimentary goods. Sustainability., 12, 556.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nagy, V. (2017). The role of the amount of money in risk-taking. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(2), 45–58.  https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2017.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shampanier, K., Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2007). Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing Science, 26(6), 742–757.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simon, H. A. (2013). The role of attention in cognition. In S. R. Friedman, K. A. Klivington, & R. W. Peterson (Eds.), The brain, cognition, and education (pp. 105–115). Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Steckel, J., Shampanier, K., O’Laughlin, L., Shea, J., & Kirk Fair, R. (2017). What consumers really think about reference price. LAW, 360.Google Scholar
  30. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thaler, R. (1983). Transaction utility theory. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 229–232.Google Scholar
  32. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yeoman, I., & McMahon-Beattie, U. (2005). Luxury markets and premium pricing. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 4(4), 319–328.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rpm.5170155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Obuda UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations