Advertisement

Optimal Trajectory Shaping Guidance Law with Seeker’s Field-of-View Constraint

  • Shaoming HeEmail author
  • Chang-Hun Lee
  • Hyo-Sang Shin
  • Antonios Tsourdos
Chapter
  • 30 Downloads
Part of the Springer Aerospace Technology book series (SAT)

Abstract

This chapter proposes a new trajectory shaping guidance law for impact time control and impact angle control with seeker’s field-of-view (FOV) limit. The proposed guidance law is derived by using the concept of biased PNG (BPNG). The guidance law developed leverages a nonlinear function to ensure the boundedness of velocity lead angle to cater for seeker’s FOV constraint. The finite-time convergence of the impact time error and impact angle error is theoretically analyzed. By investigating the optimality of the biased command, the physical meaning of the proposed trajectory shaping guidance law is revealed to support practical applications. Numerical simulations clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed formulation.

References

  1. 1.
    Sang DK, Tahk M-J (2009) Guidance law switching logic considering the seeker’s field-of-view limits. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part G: J Aerosp Eng 223(8):1049–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shim S-W, Hong S-M, Moon G-H, Tahk M-J (2018) Impact angle and time control guidance under field-of-view constraints and maneuver limits. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 19(1):217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saleem A, Ratnoo A (2016) Lyapunov-based guidance law for impact time control and simultaneous arrival. J Guid, Control, Dyn 39(1):164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeon I-S, Lee J-I (2017) Impact-time-control guidance law with constraints on seeker look angle. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 53(5):2621–2627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zarchan P (2012) Tactical and strategic missile guidance. American Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim H-G, Kim HJ (2016) Impact time control guidance considering seeker’s field-of-view limits. In 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, pp 4160–4165Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee C-H, Kim T-H, Tahk M-J (2013) Interception angle control guidance using proportional navigation with error feedback. J Guid, Control, Dyn 36(5):1556–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaoming He
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chang-Hun Lee
    • 2
  • Hyo-Sang Shin
    • 3
  • Antonios Tsourdos
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Aerospace EngineeringBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace EngineeringKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonKorea (Republic of)
  3. 3.Aerospace, Transport and ManufacturingCranfield UniversityCranfieldUK

Personalised recommendations