Advertisement

Value or Rent? A Marxist Analysis of Offsetting

  • Elia ApostolopoulouEmail author
Chapter
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

The relationship between capitalism and nature has been extensively investigated by Marxists and ecosocialists (see e.g., Marx and Engels 1970; Marx 1964; Engels 1940; Foster 1999, 2000, 2002; Foster et al. 2011; Burkett 1999; Harvey 1996, 2014; Clark and York 2005; Smith 2010; O’Connor 1998; Huber 2009, 2017; Malm 2016). In direct opposition to the reductionist hegemonic discourse that keeps humans and non-human nature in separation, the starting point for a Marxist approach to nature–society relationships is the key position of labor.

References

  1. Adams, W. M. (2017). Geographies of conservation I: De-extinction and precision conservation. Progress in Human Geography, 41, 534–545.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, W. M., & Hutton, J. (2007). People, parks and poverty: Political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society, 5(2), 147–183.Google Scholar
  3. Agrawal, A., & Redford, K. (2009). Conservation and displacement: An overview. Conservation and Society, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar
  4. Airport Expansion Consultation. (2018). The Case for Heathrow Expansion. London: Airport Expansion Consultation.Google Scholar
  5. Altvater, E. (1990). The foundations of life (nature) and the maintenance of life (work). International Journal of Political Economy, 20, 10–34.Google Scholar
  6. Altvater, E. (1993). The future of the market: An essay on the regulation of money and nature after the collapse of “actually existing socialism”. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Andreucci, D., García-Lamarca, M., Wedekind, J., & Swyngedouw, E. (2017). ‘Value Grabbing’: A political ecology of rent. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28, 28–47.Google Scholar
  8. Angelo, H., & Wachsmuth, D. (2015). Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of methodological cityism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39, 16–27.Google Scholar
  9. Apostolopoulou, E. (2019). Beyond post-politics: Offsetting, depoliticization and contestation in a community struggle against executive housing. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Apostolopoulou, E., & Adams, W. M. (2015). Neoliberal capitalism and conservation in the post-crisis era: The dialectics of ‘green’ and ‘un-green’ grabbing in Greece and the UK. Antipode, 47, 15–35.Google Scholar
  11. Apostolopoulou, E., & Adams, W. M. (2019). Cutting nature to fit: Urbanization, neoliberalism and biodiversity offsetting in England. Geoforum, 98, 214–225.Google Scholar
  12. Apostolopoulou, E., Adams, W. M., & Greco, E. (2018). Biodiversity offsetting and the production of “equivalent natures”: A Marxist critique. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 17(3), 861–892.Google Scholar
  13. Apostolopoulou, E., & Cortes-Vazquez, J. (Eds.). (2018). The right to nature: An academic-activist dialogue on environmental justice, social movements and neoliberal natures. Abingdon: Routledge-Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. Apostolopoulou, E., & Pantis, J. D. (2009). Conceptual gaps in the national strategy for the implementation of the European Natura 2000 conservation policy in Greece. Biological Conservation, 142, 221–237.Google Scholar
  15. Arbelaez, D. M. L., & Sagre, J. D. Q. (2015). Compensaciones de biodiversidad: experiencias en Latinoamérica y aplicación en el context colombiano. Gestión Y Ambiente, 18, 159–177.Google Scholar
  16. Arboleda, M. (2016a). In the nature of the non-city: Expanded infrastructural networks and the political ecology of planetary urbanisation. Antipode, 48, 233–251.Google Scholar
  17. Arboleda, M. (2016b). Spaces of extraction, metropolitan explosions. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40, 96–112.Google Scholar
  18. Arsel, M., Hogenboom, B., & Pellegrini, L. (2016). The extractive imperative in Latin America. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3, 880–887.Google Scholar
  19. Asafu-Adjaye, J., Blomqvist, L., Brand, S., Brook, B., De Fries, R., Ellis, E., et al. (2015). An ecomodernist manifesto. Available at: http://www.ecomodernism.org/manifesto.
  20. Aviation Environment Federation. (2018). Campaigning against unsustainable expansion. Available at: https://www.aef.org.uk/campaigning-against-unsustainable-expansion/.
  21. Bayon, R., Fox, J., & Carroll, N. (2008). Conservation and biodiversity banking: A guide to setting up and running biodiversity credit trading systems. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  22. BBOP (Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme). (2009a). Biodiversity offset design handbook (Appendices). Washington, DC: BBOP.Google Scholar
  23. BBOP (Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme). (2009b). BBOP pilot project case study. Akyem Gold Mining project, Eastern Region, Ghana. Washington, DC: BBOP.Google Scholar
  24. Bebbington, A., & Humphreys-Bebbington, D. (2018). Mining, movements and sustainable development: Concepts for a framework. Sustainable Development, 26, 441–449.Google Scholar
  25. Becker, B. K. (1988). Significado atual da fronteira: Uma interpretação geopolítica a partir da Amazônia brasileira. In C. Aubertin (Ed.), Fronteiras (pp. 60–89). Brasilia: Universidade de Brasilia (UNB)/ORSTOM.Google Scholar
  26. Bennett, G., Gallant, M., & ten Kate, K. (2017). State of Biodiversity Mitigation 2017. Markets and Compensation for Global Infrastructure Development: Ecosystem Marketplace, Forest Trends, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  27. Betancur, A. C., & Villa, W. (2016). Mining and indigenous peoples in Colombia. IWGIA.Google Scholar
  28. Bitsakis, E. (Μπιτσάκης, Ε. Ι.). (1997). Οικολογία: μια μαρξιστική προσέγγιση. Ουτοπία, 26, 23–52 (in Greek).Google Scholar
  29. Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. (1987). Land degradation and society. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  30. Bond, P. (2012). Emissions trading, new enclosures and eco-social contestation. Antipode, 44, 684–701.Google Scholar
  31. Borras, S. M., Jr., Franco, J. C., Gómez, S., Kay, C., & Spoor, M. (2012). Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, 845–872.Google Scholar
  32. Bracking, S., Bond, P., Brockington, D., Büscher, B., Igoe, J. J., Sullivan, S., & Woodhouse, P. (2014). Human, non-human and environmental value systems: An impossible frontier? (LSCV Working Paper Series No. 1). Leverhulme Centre for the Study of Value, School of Environment, Education and Development, The University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  33. Brenner, N. (Ed.). (2014). Implosions/explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.Google Scholar
  34. Brenner, N., & Katsikis, N. (2014). Is the mediterranean urban? In N. Brenner (Ed.), Implosions/explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization (pp. 428–459). Berlin: Jovis.Google Scholar
  35. Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2011). Planetary urbanization. In M. Gandy (Ed.), Urban constellations (pp. 10–13). Berlin: Jovis.Google Scholar
  36. Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2014). Planetary urbanization. In N. Brenner (Ed.), Implosions/explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization (pp. 160–163). Berlin: Jovis.Google Scholar
  37. Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19, 151–182.Google Scholar
  38. Bridge, G. (2011). Resource geographies 1: Making carbon economies, old and new. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 820–834.Google Scholar
  39. Brockington, D., & Igoe, J. (2006). Eviction for conservation: A global overview. Conservation and Society, 4(3), 424–470.Google Scholar
  40. Burchardt, H. J., & Dietz, K. (2014). (Neo-)extractivism, a new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third World Quarterly, 35, 468–486.Google Scholar
  41. Burkett, P. (1999). Marx and nature: A red and green perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  42. Burkett, P. (2003). The value problem in ecological economics lessons from the physiocrats and Marx. Organization & Environment, 16, 137–167.Google Scholar
  43. Burkett, P. (2006). Marxism and ecological economics: Toward a red and green political economy (Vol. 11). Historical Materialism Book Series. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  44. CAF. (2013). Carretera Interoceánica Sur del Perú: Retos e Innovación. Bogota: CAF.Google Scholar
  45. Çaglar, A., & Schiller, N. G. (2018). Migrants and city-making: Dispossession, displacement, and urban regeneration. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Callon, M. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muneisa, & L. Sui (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2003). Les marchés économiques comme dispositifs collectifs de calcul. Réseaux, 21, 189–233.Google Scholar
  48. Carbones del Cerrejón Limited y Conservación Internacional. (2012). Propuesta modelo de compensación ambiental aplicado a la intervención por los permisos de aprovechamiento forestal. Departamento de Gestión Ambiental. Carbones del Cerrejón Limited.Google Scholar
  49. CEE Bankwatch Network. (2017). Land lost but not forgotten: Impacts of the trans-Adriatic Pipeline on the land and livelihoods of farmers. Available at: https://bankwatch.org/publication/land-lost-but-not-forgotten.
  50. Christians, C., Mears, L., Whitmore, A., & Rhoades, H. (2018). Self-determination as resistance: Re-asserting control over natural resources in Colombia. In E. Apostolopoulou & J. Cortes-Vazquez (Eds.), The right to nature: Environmental justice, social movements and neoliberal natures (pp. 17–28). Abingdon: Routledge-Earthscan.Google Scholar
  51. Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Dialectical materialism and nature: An alternative to economism and deep ecology. Organization & Environment, 18, 318–337.Google Scholar
  52. Commonwealth of Australia. (2012). Environment protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 environmental offsets policy. Department of the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/12630bb4-2c10-4c8e-815f-2d7862bf87e7/files/offsets-policy_2.pdf.
  53. Conway, M., Rayment, M., White, A., & Berman, S. (2013). Exploring potential demand for and supply of habitat banking in the EU and appropriate design elements for a habitat banking scheme (Final Report Submitted to DG Environment). UK: ICF GHK and BIO Intelligence Service.Google Scholar
  54. Corbera, E., & Brown, K. (2010). Offsetting benefits? Analysing access to forest carbon. Environment and Planning a, 42, 1739–1761.Google Scholar
  55. Cortes-Vazquez, J. A., & Apostolopoulou, E. (2019). Against neoliberal natures: Environmental movements, radical practice and “the right to nature”. Geoforum, 98, 202–205.Google Scholar
  56. Crezee, B. (2017). Preocupantes efectos de una carretera: la interoceánica y la deforestación que causa. Mongabay. Available at: https://es.mongabay.com/2017/10/preocupantes-efectos-una-carretera-la-interoceanica-la-deforestacion-causa/.
  57. Cruz, J., Cenzano, A., & Supa, H., et al. (2008). Impactos ambientales y sociales de la carretera Interoceánica (Parliamentary Report).Google Scholar
  58. d’Amour, C. B., Reitsma, F., Baiocchi, G., et al. (2017). Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 8939–8944.Google Scholar
  59. Danchev, S., Paratsiokas, N., & Tsakanikas, A. (2013). Economic impact from the construction and operation of the trans Adriatic pipeline on Greek territory. Athens: Foundation for Economic and Industrial Research.Google Scholar
  60. Dauguet, B. (2015). Biodiversity offsetting as a commodification process: A French case study as a concrete example. Biological Conservation, 192, 533–540.Google Scholar
  61. DEC. (2006). BioBanking: A biodiversity offsets and banking scheme: Conserving and restoring biodiversity in NSW (Working Paper). Sydney: Department of Environment and Conservation NSW.Google Scholar
  62. DEC. (2007). BioBanking: Biodiversity banking and offsets scheme: Scheme overview. Sydney: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW.Google Scholar
  63. Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). (2013). Biodiversity offsetting in England green paper. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London, UK. Available at: https://consult.defra.gov.uk/biodiversity/biodiversity_offsetting/supporting_documents/20130903Biodiversity%20offsetting%20green%20paper.pdf.
  64. Dempsey, J., & Suarez, D. C. (2016). Arrested development? The promises and paradoxes of “selling nature to save it”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(3), 653–671.Google Scholar
  65. Department for Transport. (2017a). Revised draft airports national policy statement: New runway capacity and infrastructure at airports in the South East of England. Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 9(2) of the Planning Act 2008. London: Department for Transport.Google Scholar
  66. Department for Transport. (2017b). Appraisal of sustainability: Draft airports national policy statement. Consultation draft. Exeter: Department for Transport and WSP, Parsons Brinckerhoff.Google Scholar
  67. Department of Defense and EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2008). Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources; Final Rule. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD and Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  68. Dickinson, S., & Berner, P. O. (2010). Ambatovy project: Mining in a challenging biodiversity setting in Madagascar. In S. M. Goodman & V. Mass (Eds.), Biodiversity, exploration, and conservation of the natural habitats associated with the Ambatovy project. Malagasy Nature 3 (pp. 2–13). Antananarivo: Association Vahatra.Google Scholar
  69. Dourojeanni, M., Barandarián, A., & Dourojeanni, D. (2010). Amazonía peruana en 2021: Explotación de recursos naturales e infraestructura ¿Qué está pasando? ¿Qué es lo que significa para el futuro? Bois et Forets des Tropiques, 305, 77–82.Google Scholar
  70. Dyer, S., Grant, J., Lesack, T., et al. (2008). Catching up: Conservation and biodiversity offsets in Alberta’s boreal forests. Ottawa: Canadian Boreal Initiative.Google Scholar
  71. EFTEC and IEEP. (2010). The use of market-based instruments for biodiversity protection—The case of Habitat Banking. Technical Report for European Commission DG Environment, EFTEC and IEEP, London.Google Scholar
  72. Ekers, M., & Loftus, A. (2013). Revitalizing the production of nature thesis: A Gramscian turn? Progress in Human Geography, 37, 234–252.Google Scholar
  73. Elnaschie, S. (2013). Rio Tinto: Compensation manipulation in Southeast Madagascar. Available at: http://www.ejolt.org/2013/11/rio-tinto-compensation-manipulation-in-southeast-madagascar/.
  74. Engels, F. (1844). The condition of the working-class in England. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  75. Engels, F. (1940). Dialectics of nature. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  76. Engels, F. (2017 [1878]). Anti-dühring. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.Google Scholar
  77. Escalas, A., Ayllón, R., Escobedo Grandez, J., et al. (2017). Estudios de caso para el desarrollo de la compensación ambiental en el Perú: Madre de Dios. Lima: CSF.Google Scholar
  78. Escobar, A. (1999). After nature: Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology, 40, 1–30.Google Scholar
  79. European Investment Bank. (2017). Environmental and social data sheet TAP—Trans Adriatic Pipeline. Available at: http://www.eib.org/attachments/registers/66312481.pdf.
  80. Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012). Green Grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, 237–261.Google Scholar
  81. Felli, R. (2014). On climate rent. Historical Materialism, 22, 251–280.Google Scholar
  82. Ferguson, N. (2014). From coal pits to tar sands: Examining labour migration between the Athabasca oil sands and an Atlantic Canadian region. Just Labour, 17–18, 106–118.Google Scholar
  83. Fine, B., & Lapavitsas, C. (2000). Markets and money in social theory: What role for economics? Economy and Society, 29, 357–382.Google Scholar
  84. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2003). Federal guidance for the establishment, use, and operation of conservation banks. Washington, DC: United States Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  85. Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 366–405.Google Scholar
  86. Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  87. Foster, J. B. (2002). Ecology against capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  88. Foster, J. B., Clark, B., & York, R. (2011). The ecological rift: Capitalism’s war on the earth. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  89. Gandy, M. (2003). Concrete and clay: Reworking nature in New York City. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  90. Greco, E. (2015). Value or rent? Leverhulme centre for the study of value (Working Paper No. 12). University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  91. Greco, E., & Apostolopoulou, E. (2019). Value, rent and nature: The centrality of class. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(1).Google Scholar
  92. Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., et al. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319, 756–760.Google Scholar
  93. Hackett, R. (2015). Offsetting dispossession? Terrestrial conservation offsets and First Nation treaty rights in Alberta, Canada. Geoforum, 60, 62–71.Google Scholar
  94. Hackett, R. (2016). ‘Shell games’, displacement and the reordering of boreal landscapes in Alberta, Canada. Area, 48, 153–160.Google Scholar
  95. Hahs, A. K., McDonnell, M. J., McCarthy, M. A., et al. (2009). A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecology Letters, 12, 1165–1173.Google Scholar
  96. Hallstrom, L., Stonechild, J., & Reist, W. (2015). Alberta. In S. Markey, S. Breen, A. Lauzon, et al. (Eds.), State of rural Canada report (pp. 17–24). CRRF: Canada.Google Scholar
  97. Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanization of Capital. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Harvey, D. (1996). Nature, justice and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  99. Harvey, D. (2006). The limits to capital. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  100. Harvey, D. (2010a). A companion to Marx’s capital. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  101. Harvey, D. (2010b). The enigma of capital: And the crises of capitalism. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  102. Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  103. Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. London, UK: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  104. Heathrow Airport Ltd. (2018). Heathrow 2.0. Carbon Neutral Growth Roadmap. Available at: https://your.heathrow.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Heathrow-Carbon-neutral-growth-online.pdf.
  105. Heynen, N. (2014). Urban political ecology I: The urban century. Progress in Human Geography, 38, 598–604.Google Scholar
  106. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (Eds.). (2006). In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Huber, M. (2009). Energizing historical materialism: Fossil fuels, space and the capitalist mode of production. Geoforum, 40, 105–115.Google Scholar
  108. Huber, M. (2017). Value, nature and labor: A defense of Marx. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28, 39–52.Google Scholar
  109. Ibañez, D., & Katsikis, N. (2014). Editorial. In D. Ibañez & N. Katsikis (Eds.), New geographies 06: Grounding metabolism (pp. 2–9). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Igoe, J., Neves, K., & Brockington, D. (2010). A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: Theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode, 42, 486–512.Google Scholar
  111. International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2011). Regional economic outlook, Western Hemisphere. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  112. Jacob, C., Vaissiere, A. C., Bas, A., et al. (2016). Investigating the inclusion of ecosystem services in biodiversity offsetting. Ecosystem Services, 21, 92–102.Google Scholar
  113. Jones, P. (2009). Saving the planet or selling off the atmosphere? Emissions trading, capital accumulation and the carbon rent. Marxist Interventions, 1, 9–22.Google Scholar
  114. Kaika, M. (2005). City of flows. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  115. Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2014, May 14). Radical urban political-ecological imaginaries: Planetary urbanization and politicizing nature. Derive Journal.Google Scholar
  116. Kallis, G., & Swyngedouw, E. (2018). Do bees produce value? A conversation between an ecological economist and a Marxist geographer. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 29, 36–50.Google Scholar
  117. Katz, C. (1998). Whose nature, whose culture?: Private productions of space and the ‘preservation’ of nature. In B. Braun & N. Castree (Eds.), Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium (pp. 45–62). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  118. Keil, R. (2003). Progress report: Urban political ecology. Urban Geography, 24, 723–738.Google Scholar
  119. Keller, R., & Turek, M. (1998). American Indians and National Parks. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  120. Kelly, A. B. (2011). Conservation practice as primitive accumulation. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38, 683–701.Google Scholar
  121. Kemf, E. (1993). Indigenous peoples and protected areas: The law of mother Earth. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  122. Lapeyre, R., Froger, G., & Hrabanski, M. (2015). Biodiversity offsets as market-based instruments for ecosystem services? From discourses to practices. Ecosystem Services, 15, 125–133.Google Scholar
  123. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  124. Lefebvre, H. (1970). La révolution urbaine (Vol. 216). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  125. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  126. Loftus, A. (2012). Everyday environmentalism: Creating an urban political ecology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  127. Lohmann, L. (2012). Financialization, commodification and carbon: The contradictions of neoliberal climate policy. Socialist Register, 48, 85–107.Google Scholar
  128. MacKenzie, D. (2009). Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 440–455.Google Scholar
  129. Magdoff, F. (2002). Capitalism’s twin crises: Economic and environmental. Monthly Review, 54. Available at: https://www.monthlyreview.org/0902magdoff.htm.
  130. Malm, A. (2016). Fossil capital: The rise of steam power and the roots of global warming. Brooklyn: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  131. Martinez-Alier, J. (1995). Political ecology, distributional conflicts and economic incommensurability. New Left Review, 211, 70–88.Google Scholar
  132. Marx, K. (1887). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. I). Moscow: Progress Publishers. Available at: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/.
  133. Marx, K. (1894). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. III). New York: International Publishers. Available at: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/.
  134. Marx, K. (1964). The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  135. Marx, K. (1973 [1857]). Grundrisse. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  136. Marx, K. (1990). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. I, Ben Fowkes, Trans.). London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  137. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology (Vol. 1). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  138. Massey, D. (1984). Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geographies of production. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  139. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  140. McAfee, K. (2012). The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. Development and Change, 43, 105–131.Google Scholar
  141. McDonough, E. (2015). Global flows, local conflicts and the challenge of urban governance: Managing the city-airport interface in London, UK. BIVEC/GIBET Transport Research Days 2015: Current Issues in Transportation Research.Google Scholar
  142. Mercer and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). (2017). Crossing the bridge to sustainable infrastructure investing. Inter-American Development Bank. Available at: https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/12717/crossing-bridge-sustainable-infrastructure-investing-exploring-ways-make-it.
  143. Merrifield, A. (2013). The urban question under planetary urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 909–922.Google Scholar
  144. O’Connor, J. (1998). Natural causes. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  145. Ordner, J. (2018). Petro-politics and local natural resource protection: Grassroots opposition to the keystone XL pipeline in Nebraska. In E. Apostolopoulou & J. Cortes-Vazquez (Eds.), The right to nature: Environmental justice, social movements and neoliberal natures (pp. 29–42). Abingdon: Routledge-Earthscan.Google Scholar
  146. Oxford Economics. (2013). The economic impact of the trans-Adriatic pipeline on Albania: A report for TAP AG.Google Scholar
  147. Padoch, C., Brondizio, E., Costa, S., et al. (2008). Urban forest and rural cities: Multi-sited households, consumption patterns, and forest resources in Amazonia. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 2.Google Scholar
  148. Peet, R., & Watts, M. (2000). Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  149. Perreault, T. (2013). Dispossession by accumulation? Mining, water and the nature of enclosure on the Bolivian Altiplano. Antipode, 45, 1050–1069.Google Scholar
  150. Pierce, J., Martin, D., & Murphy, J. (2011). Relational place making: The networked politics of place. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 54–70.Google Scholar
  151. Poulton, D. W. (2014). Biodiversity offsets, a primer for Canada. Sustainable Prosperity and Institute of the Environment, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  152. Purcell, M. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36, 141–154.Google Scholar
  153. Purcell, T. F., Loftus, A., & March, H. (2019). Value–rent–finance. Progress in Human Geography.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519838064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. QMM (QIT Madagascar Minerals). (2009, March). A mine at the rescue of the unique biodiversity of the littoral zone of Fort-Dauphin. QIT Madagascar Minerals SA Press kit. Available at: http://www.riotintomadagascar.com/english/media.asp.
  155. Re:Common. (2019). Turning forests into hotels: The true cost of biodiversity offsetting in Uganda. Available at: https://www.recommon.org/eng/turning-forests-into-hotels-the-true-cost-of-biodiversity-offsetting-in-uganda/.
  156. Robbins, P. (2012). Lawn people: How grasses, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  157. Robertson, M. (2012). Measurement and alienation: Making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 386–401.Google Scholar
  158. Ruddick, S., Peake, L., Tanyildiz, G. S., et al. (2017). Planetary urbanization: An urban theory for our time? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36, 387–404.Google Scholar
  159. Schmid, C., Karaman, O., Hanakata, N. C., et al. (2018). Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach. Urban Studies, 55, 19–52.Google Scholar
  160. Seagle, C. (2012). Inverting the impacts: Mining, conservation and sustainability claims near the Rio Tinto/QMM ilmenite mine in Southeast Madagascar. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, 447–477.Google Scholar
  161. Seto, K. C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B., et al. (2011). A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23777.Google Scholar
  162. Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16083–16088.Google Scholar
  163. Smith, N. (2005). Foreword. In N. Heynen, M. Kaika, & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism (pp. xi–xv). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  164. Smith, N. (2006a). Foreword. In N. Heynen, M. Kaika, & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  165. Smith, N. (2006b). Nature as accumulation strategy. In L. Panitch & C. Leys (Eds.), Socialist register 2007: Coming to terms with nature (pp. 16–36). London: Merlin.Google Scholar
  166. Smith, N. (2010). Uneven development (3rd ed.). New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  167. Soja, E. W. (1980). The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70, 207–225.Google Scholar
  168. Soja, E. W., & Kanai, J. (2006). The urbanization of the world. In N. Brenner (Ed.), Implosions/explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization (pp. 142–159). Berlin: Jovis.Google Scholar
  169. Solly, R. (2016). A struggle between a Tethered Donkey and a Tiger. London Mining Network. Available at: http://londonminingnetwork.org/2016/08/cerrejon-coal-a-struggle-between-a-tethered-donkey-and-a-tiger/.
  170. Sullivan, S. (2013). After the green rush? Biodiversity offsets, uranium power, and the ‘calculus of casualties’ in greening growth. Human Geography, 6, 80–101.Google Scholar
  171. Sweezy, P. M. (2004). Capitalism and the environment. Monthly Review, 56, 86–93.Google Scholar
  172. Swyngedouw, E. (1996). The city as hybrid: On nature, society, and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 7, 65–80.Google Scholar
  173. Swyngedouw, E. (2012). Rent and landed property. In B. Fine & A. Saad-Filho (Eds.), The Elgar companion to Marxist economics (pp. 310–315). Northhampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  174. Swyngedouw, E., & Heynen, N. C. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35, 898–918.Google Scholar
  175. TAP (Trans Adriatic Pipeline). (2013a). ESIA Albania. Available at: https://www.tap-ag.com/resource-library/reference-documents/esia-documents/esia-albania-in-english.
  176. TAP (Trans Adriatic Pipeline). (2013b). ESIA Greece. Available at: https://www.tap-ag.com/resource-library/reference-documents/esia-documents/esia-greece-in-english.
  177. TAP (Trans Adriatic Pipeline). (2013c). ESIA Italy. Available at: https://www.tap-ag.com/resource-library/reference-documents/esia-documents/esia-italy-in-english.
  178. TAP (Trans Adriatic Pipeline). (2015). Environmental, socioeconomic, and cultural heritage overview. Available at: https://www.tap-ag.com/resource-library/reference-documents/project-finance-disclosure/environmental-social-and-cultural-heritage-overview.
  179. TAP (Trans Adriatic Pipeline). (2016). Biodiversity offset strategy. CAL00-C5577-640-Y-TRY-0001. RSK.Google Scholar
  180. Teherán, S. (2014). Impactos socioterritoriales de la explotación minera en los departamentos del Cesar y La Guajira. In G. Rudas & D. Hawkins (Eds.), La minería de carbón a gran escala en Colombia: Impactos económicos, sociales, laborales, ambientales y territoriales (pp. 44–67). Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung: Bogotá.Google Scholar
  181. Temper, L., Demaria, F., Scheidel, A., et al. (2018). The Global Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas): Ecological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 13, 573–584.Google Scholar
  182. TransCanada Pipelines Limited. (2018). Applications for the white spruce pipeline project Fort McKay area. Alberta Energy Regulator. Available at: https://www.aer.ca/documents/decisions/2018/2018ABAER001.pdf.
  183. United Nations (UN). (2018). World urbanization prospects (The 2018 Revision). New York: UN.Google Scholar
  184. Vlachou, A. (2005). Environmental regulation: A value-theoretic and class-based analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 577–599.Google Scholar
  185. Vergara, K., Figallo, M., & Glave, M. (2014). Infraestructura en la Amazonía peruana: Una propuesta para proyectar cambios en la cobertura boscosa en la carretera Pucallpa-Cruzeiro do Sul. In R. Barrantes & M. Glave (Eds.), Amazonía peruana y desarrollo económico (pp. 161–208). Lima: IEP and GRADE.Google Scholar
  186. Vicente, A., Martin, N., Slee, D., et al. (2011). Carbón para el mundo, retroceso para La Guajira. In PBI Colombia, Boletín informativo no 18 (pp. 32–36). Colombia: PBI.Google Scholar
  187. Villarroya, A., Barros, A. C., & Kiesecker, J. (2014). Policy development for environmental licensing and biodiversity offsets in Latin America. PLoS ONE, 9, e107144.Google Scholar
  188. Wachsmuth, D. (2014). City as ideology: Reconciling the explosion of the city form with the tenacity of the city concept. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 75–90.Google Scholar
  189. Weinhold, B. (2011). Alberta’s oil sands: Hard evidence, missing data, new promises. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119, A126–A131.Google Scholar
  190. Winter, A. (2018). Illegal camping in “stolen native land”. In E. Apostolopoulou & J. Cortes-Vazquez (Eds.), The right to nature: Environmental justice, social movements and neoliberal natures (pp. 263–276). Abingdon: Routledge-Earthscan.Google Scholar
  191. World Bank. (2009). Global Economic Prospects. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  192. WRM & Re:Common. (2016). Rio Tinto in Madagascar: A mining destroying the unique biodiversity of the littoral zone of Fort Dauphin. WRM and Re:Common.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations