Advertisement

How Mrs Farquharson Triumphed but Was Excluded from a Glittering Occasion

  • Peter Ayres
Chapter
  • 6 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Science and Technology book series (PSHST)

Abstract

In girlhood Marian Ridley developed an interest in ferns and mosses. Well connected by birth and marriage (her husband, Robert Farquharson, owned huge estates in Aberdeenshire), she was in adulthood haughty, disliked by some women, but confident enough to challenge the Linnean Society. In 1904, she and her male supporters eventually persuaded the Linnean to admit female fellows, but she herself was blackballed. She was excluded from celebrations which involved a grand dinner in Piccadilly where Mary Russell, Duchess of Bedford, spoke for the new female fellows. Ill health dogged Farquharson’s life and she died before she could take up a fellowship when it was finally offered.

References

  1. Anonymous. 1882. Essex Field Club Journal 2: 62.Google Scholar
  2. Arber, Agnes. 1903. The Work of Women in Botanical Research. Biennial Leaflet. London: The Women’s Agricultural and Horticultural International Union. Cited by Schmid, Rudolf. 2001. Agnes Arber, née Robertson (1879–1960): Fragments of Her Life, Including Her Place in Biology and in Women’s Studies. Annals of Botany 88: 1105–1128.Google Scholar
  3. Blackwell, Elsie M. 1936–1937. Obituary. Margaret Jane Benson. Proceedings of the Linnean Society 149: 186–189.Google Scholar
  4. Blunt, Alison. 1994. Travel, Gender and Imperialism. Mary Kingsley and West Africa. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Buxton, Meriel. 2008. The High-Flying Duchess. Mary Du Caurroy Bedford 1865–1937. Leicester: Woodperry Books.Google Scholar
  6. Douglas, Gina. 2010. Farquharson, Marian Sarah (1846–1912). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Farquharson, Marian S. 1885–1886. Scottish Naturalist 8: 381.Google Scholar
  8. Farquharson, Mrs., FRMS. 1886. On the Identification of the British Mosses by Their Distinctive Characters. British Association for the Advancement of Science: Held at Aberdeen in September 1885. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  9. Farquharson, Marian S. 1889–1890. Scottish Naturalist 10: 193–198.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1900. Women in Professions, 184–185 in the Professional Section of the International Congress of Women, London, July 1899, ed. Lady Ishbel Aberdeen. London: T Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Frank, Katherine. 2005. A Voyager Out: The Life of Mary Kingsley. New York: Tauris Parke Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  12. Fraser-Mackintosh, C. 1898. An Account of the Confederation of Clan Chattan; Its Kith and Kin. Glasgow: John Mackay.Google Scholar
  13. Gage, A.T., and W.T. Stearn. 1988. A Bicentenary History of the Linnean Society of London. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Geison, G.L. 1978. Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology. Princeton, NJ: University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Glick, Daphne. 1995. The National Council of Women of Great Britain: The First One Hundred Years 1895–1995. London: National Council of Women of Great Britain.Google Scholar
  16. Groves, J. 1913. Henry Groves (1855–1912). Journal of Botany 51: 73–79.Google Scholar
  17. Hudson, Briony. 2013. The School of Pharmacy, University of London: Medicines, Science, and Society, 1842–1912. London: Academic Press/Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. Hutchinson, Horace G. 1914. Life of Sir John Lubbock. Lord Avebury. Vol. ii. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, Claire G. 2009. Bodies of Controversy? Women and the Royal Society. In Femininity, Mathematics and Science, 1880–1914, ed. Claire G. Jones, 175–204. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marsden, J. 2003. Charter and Bye-Laws. The Linnean 19: 13–15.Google Scholar
  21. Mason, Joan. 1991. Hertha Ayrton (1854–1923) and the Admission of Women to the Royal Society of London. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 45: 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 1995. The Women Fellows’ Jubilee. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 49: 126.Google Scholar
  23. O’Connor, W.J. 1991. British Physiologists, 1885–1914. A Biographical Dictionary. Manchester: University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pedersen, Sarah. 2004. Within Their Sphere? Correspondence to the Aberdeen Daily Newspapers, 1900–1918. Ph.D. thesis. The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  25. Pim, Sheila. 1966. The Wood and the Trees. A Biography of Augustine Henry. London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
  26. Pugsley, H.W. 1933. Obituary. James Groves (1858–1933). Journal of Botany 71: 136–139.Google Scholar
  27. Quinn, Susan. 1996. Marie Curie. A Life. London: Mandarin.Google Scholar
  28. Ridley, Marian S. 1881. A Pocket Guide to British Ferns. London: David Bogue.Google Scholar
  29. Roy, J. 1890. Freshwater Algae of Enbridge Lake and Vicinity, Hampshire. Journal of Botany 28: 334–338.Google Scholar
  30. Royle, Alice C. 1903. Mrs Farquharson of Haughton FRMS. Botanist and Writer. Boudoir 2: 811–816.Google Scholar
  31. Savage, S. 1936–1937. Obituaries. Mary du Caurroy Russell, Her Grace the Duchess of Bedford. Proceedings of the The Linnean Society 149: 185.Google Scholar
  32. Sheffield, Suzanne le-May. 2006. Gendered Collaborations: Marrying Art and Science. In Figuring It Out: Science, Gender and Visual Culture, ed. Ann Shteir and Bernard Lightman, 240–266. London: Dartmouth College Press.Google Scholar
  33. Thompson, P. 1930. A Short History of the Essex Field Club. Essex Field Cub Special Memoirs 7: 2.Google Scholar
  34. Van der Pas, P.W. 1970. The Correspondence of Hugo de Vries and Charles Darwin. Janus 57: 173–213.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Ayres
    • 1
  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations