Advertisement

Fellowship and a Woman’s Place in Edwardian Britain

  • Peter Ayres
Chapter
  • 6 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Science and Technology book series (PSHST)

Abstract

Women were excluded from the most learned societies, cutting them off from libraries, reference collections, and men and women with similar interests. Their employment prospects were damaged. Lady Warwick’s Association targeted the Royal Society, the Royal Microscopical, and the Linnean. When women were finally admitted to the latter they quickly demonstrated their worth.

References

  1. Anonymous. 1899. Notes. Nature, 26 October, 60, 621–625.Google Scholar
  2. Ayres, P.G. 2005. Harry Marshall Ward and the Fungal Thread of Death. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
  3. Beale, N., and Elaine Beale. 2011. Echoes of Ingen Housz. The Long Lost Story of the Genius Who Rescued the Habsburgs from Smallpox and Became the Father of Photosynthesis. Salisbury: Hobnob Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, Susan D. 2006. ‘Supposed Differences’: Lydia Becker and Victorian Women’s Participation in the BAAS. In Repositioning the Victorian Sciences: Shifting Centres in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Thinking, ed. David Clifford, Elisabeth Wadge, Alex Warwick, and Martin Willis, 85–93. New York: Anthem.Google Scholar
  5. De Chadarevian, Soraya. 1996. Laboratory Science Versus Country-House Experiments. The Controversy between Julius Sachs and Charles Darwin. British Journal of the History of Science 29: 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Endersby, J. 2008. Imperial Nature. Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fara, Patricia. 2018. A Lab of One’s Own. Science and Suffrage in the First World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Heffer, S. 2017. The Age of Decadence. Britain 1880 to 1914. London: Random House Books.Google Scholar
  9. Opitz, D.L. 2004. ‘Behind Folding Shutters in Whittingehame House’: Alice Blanche Balfour (1850–1936) and Amateur Natural History. Archives of Natural History 31: 330–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2014. ‘Back to the Land’: Lady Warwick and the Movement for Women’s Collegiate Agricultural Education. Agricultural History Review 62: 119–145.Google Scholar
  11. Richmond, Marsha L. 1997. ‘A Lab of One’s Own’. The Balfour Biological Laboratory for Women at Cambridge University, 1884–1914. Isis 88: 422–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Scott, D.H. 1925. German Reminiscences of the Early Eighties. New Phytologist 24: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Scott, Caroline. 2017. Holding the Home Front. The Women’s Land Army in the First World War. Barnsley: Pen & Sword Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Ayres
    • 1
  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations