Students and Teachers as Authors in a Bakhtinian Critical Dialogue

  • Eugene MatusovEmail author


I provide an example of ontological critical education. In my analysis of example, I show the authorial nature of the critical intrinsic education for both students and the teacher. The notion of authorial education and authorship is constructed as transcendence of the culturally given recognized by relevant others and/or the self. Of course, this example is only approximation to critical intrinsic education in a post-work leisure-based society.


  1. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1991). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. (2017). The rediscovery of teaching. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danaher, J. (2019). Automation and utopia: Human flourishing in a world without work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Kelly, K. (2017). The inevitable: Understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Klag, P. (1994). A new look at invitational education. The Collaborator, 5(14), 1–2.Google Scholar
  10. Kukathas, C. (2003). The liberal archipelago: A theory of diversity and freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lave, J. (1992). Learning as participation in communities of practice. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
  15. Lobok, A. M. (2014). Education/obrazovanie as an experience of an encounter. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 2, S1–S5. Retrieved from
  16. Lobok, A. M. (2017). The cartography of inner childhood: Fragments from the book. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 5, SIa1–SIa42.Google Scholar
  17. Matusov, E. (2001). Becoming an adult member in a community of learners. In B. Rogoff, C. G. Turkanis, & L. Bartlett (Eds.), Learning together: Children and adults in a school community (pp. 166–174). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Matusov, E. (2011). Authorial teaching and learning. In E. J. White & M. Peters (Eds.), Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe (pp. 21–46). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Matusov, E. (2015). Chronotopes in education: Conventional and dialogic. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 3, A65–A97. Retrieved from
  21. Matusov, E. (2017). Nikolai N. Konstantinov’s authorial math pedagogy for people with wings: Special issue. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 54(1), 1–117.
  22. Matusov, E. (2020). Envisioning education in a post-work leisure-based society: A dialogic perspective. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  23. Matusov, E., Baker, D., Fan, Y., Choi, H. J., & Hampel, R. L. (2017). Magic Learning Pill: Ontological and instrumental learning in order to speed up education. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(3), 456–476. Scholar
  24. Matusov, E., & Brobst, J. (2013). Radical experiment in dialogic pedagogy in higher education and its centaur failure: Chronotopic analysis. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2016). Dialogic authorial approach to creativity in education: Transforming a deadly homework into a creative activity. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp. 307–325). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  26. Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2018a). Beyond equality and inequality in education: Bakhtinian dialogic ethics approach of human uniqueness to educational justice. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 6, E1–E38. Retrieved from
  27. Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2018b). Teaching as dialogic conceptual art. Knowledge Cultures, 6(2), 9–27. Scholar
  28. Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2019). Intrinsic education and its discontents. In L. Tateo (Ed.), Educational dilemmas: A cultural psychological perspective (pp. 21–40). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Gradovski, M. (2019). Dialogic pedagogy and polyphonic research art: Bakhtin by and for educators. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  30. Matusov, E., & von Duyke, K. (2010). Bakhtin’s notion of the Internally Persuasive Discourse in education: Internal to what? (A case of discussion of issues of foul language in teacher education). In K. Junefelt & P. Nordin (Eds.), Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on Perspectives and Limits of Dialogism in Mikhail Bakhtin Stockholm University, Sweden June 3–5, 2009 (pp. 174–199). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  31. Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446. Scholar
  32. Mitra, S. (2013). Build a school in the cloud. Retrieved from
  33. Morson, G. S. (2004). The process of ideological becoming. In A. F. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 317–331). Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Nancy, J.-L. (1991). Introduction. In E. Cadava, P. Connor, & J.-L. Nancy (Eds.), Who comes after the subject? (pp. 1–8). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Nikulin, D. V. (2006). On dialogue. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  36. Nikulin, D. V. (2010). Dialectic and dialogue. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2008). The emergent curriculum: Navigating a complex course between unguided learning and planned enculturation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plato, & Riddell, J. (1973). The Apology of Plato, with a revised text and English notes, and a digest of Platonic idioms. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
  39. Seabrook, J. (1989). The leisure society. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Tannen, D. (2005). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends (New ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations