Relatedness, Economic Complexity and Convergence Across European Regions
- 20 Downloads
The aim of this paper is to analyze how the heterogeneous structure of the European regions has affected their patterns of convergence or divergence. We analyse data collected by Eurostat, from a balanced panel of 191 regions and 55 economic branches over the period 2003–2015. In this way, we are able to describe and capture technological proximity across the regions and analyse how it has evolved over space and time. Limiting the analysis to the manufacturing activities, we are also able to measure the degree of economic complexity of the regional production systems and assess how this affects their patterns of growth.
Our findings suggest that spatial effects tend to push towards convergence, with the Eastern regions that started from relatively low levels of GDP per capita and experienced higher growth rates. Nevertheless, the different level of economic complexity tends to widen the gaps between territories: for example, the German regions, whose economic structures are more complex, have kept on widening the gap between themselves and the other European regions. The two different forces are also interconnected as the Eastern regions combine a relatively low level of GDP per capita with a significant level of economic complexity. During the period considered, the improvement in living standards has corresponded to the upgrade of their manufacturing production structures.
KeywordsRegional disparities Growth Convergence Structural change Relatedness Economic complexity Spatial effects.
- Arbia, G., Basile, R., & Piras, G. (2005). Using spatial panel data in modelling regional growth and convergence. Working Paper 55. ISAE.Google Scholar
- Baumol, W. J. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: What the long run data show. American Economic Review, 76, 1072–1085.Google Scholar
- Buccellato, T. (2007). Convergence across Russian regions: A spatial econometric approach. Discussion Paper 70. Center for Financial and Management Studies, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
- Buccellato, T. (2016). The competences of firms are the backbone of economic complexity. SSRN Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Crescenzi, R., Datu, K., & Iammarino, S. (2017). European cities and Foreign investment networks. Scienze Regionali, Fascicolo 2, maggio-agosto 2017. https://doi.org/10.14650/86465
- Demertzis, M., Sapir, A., & Wolff, G. (2019, April). Promoting sustainable and inclusive growth and convergence in the European Union. Bruegel Policy Contribution, Issue 7.Google Scholar
- Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2010, November). Country diversification, product ubiquity, and economic divergence. Faculty Research Working Paper Series, Harvard Kennedy School.Google Scholar
- Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S, Jimenez, J., Simoes, A., & Yıldırım, M. A. (2011). The Atlas of economic complexity—Mapping path to prosperity. Center for International Development at Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, Macro Connection—MIT Media Lab, MIT.Google Scholar
- Hidalgo, C. A. (2015). Why information grows. The evolution of order, from atoms to economy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Iammarino, S., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2018). Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby021.
- Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Pisano, G. P., & Shih, W. C. (2012). Producing prosperity. Why America needs a manufacturing renaissance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar