Relatedness, Economic Complexity and Convergence Across European Regions

  • Tullio BuccellatoEmail author
  • Giancarlo Corò
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


The aim of this paper is to analyze how the heterogeneous structure of the European regions has affected their patterns of convergence or divergence. We analyse data collected by Eurostat, from a balanced panel of 191 regions and 55 economic branches over the period 2003–2015. In this way, we are able to describe and capture technological proximity across the regions and analyse how it has evolved over space and time. Limiting the analysis to the manufacturing activities, we are also able to measure the degree of economic complexity of the regional production systems and assess how this affects their patterns of growth.

Our findings suggest that spatial effects tend to push towards convergence, with the Eastern regions that started from relatively low levels of GDP per capita and experienced higher growth rates. Nevertheless, the different level of economic complexity tends to widen the gaps between territories: for example, the German regions, whose economic structures are more complex, have kept on widening the gap between themselves and the other European regions. The two different forces are also interconnected as the Eastern regions combine a relatively low level of GDP per capita with a significant level of economic complexity. During the period considered, the improvement in living standards has corresponded to the upgrade of their manufacturing production structures.


Regional disparities Growth Convergence Structural change Relatedness Economic complexity Spatial effects. 


  1. Arbia, G., Basile, R., & Piras, G. (2005). Using spatial panel data in modelling regional growth and convergence. Working Paper 55. ISAE.Google Scholar
  2. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 22(1), 107–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumol, W. J. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: What the long run data show. American Economic Review, 76, 1072–1085.Google Scholar
  4. Boltho, A., Carlin, W., & Scaramozzino, P. (2018). Why East Germany did not become a new Mezzogiorno. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46, 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brock, W., & Durlauf, S. (2001). Growth empirics and reality. World Bank Economic Review, 15, 229–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buccellato, T. (2007). Convergence across Russian regions: A spatial econometric approach. Discussion Paper 70. Center for Financial and Management Studies, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
  8. Buccellato, T. (2016). The competences of firms are the backbone of economic complexity. SSRN Working Paper.Google Scholar
  9. Buciuni, G., Corò, G., & Micelli, S. (2014). Rethinking the role of manufacturing in global value chains: An international comparative study in the furniture industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(4), 967–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crescenzi, R., Datu, K., & Iammarino, S. (2017). European cities and Foreign investment networks. Scienze Regionali, Fascicolo 2, maggio-agosto 2017.
  11. Cuaresma, C. J., Doppelhofer, G., & Feldkircher, M. (2014). The determinants of economic growth in European regions. Regional Studies, 48(1), 44–67. ISSN 1360-0591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Demertzis, M., Sapir, A., & Wolff, G. (2019, April). Promoting sustainable and inclusive growth and convergence in the European Union. Bruegel Policy Contribution, Issue 7.Google Scholar
  13. Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2010, November). Country diversification, product ubiquity, and economic divergence. Faculty Research Working Paper Series, Harvard Kennedy School.Google Scholar
  14. Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S, Jimenez, J., Simoes, A., & Yıldırım, M. A. (2011). The Atlas of economic complexity—Mapping path to prosperity. Center for International Development at Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, Macro Connection—MIT Media Lab, MIT.Google Scholar
  15. Hidalgo, C. A. (2015). Why information grows. The evolution of order, from atoms to economy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317, 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iammarino, S., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2018). Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 1–26.
  18. Le Gallo, J., Ertur, C., & Baoumont, C. (2003). A spatial econometric analysis of convergence across European regions, 1980–1995. In B. Fingleton (Ed.), European regional growth (Advances in spatial sciences) (pp. 99–129). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pisano, G. P., & Shih, W. C. (2012). Producing prosperity. Why America needs a manufacturing renaissance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rey, S. G., & Montouri, B. D. (2000). U.S. regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies, 33, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2017). The revenge of the places that don’t matter. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. ISSN 1752-1378. Scholar
  24. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), s71–s102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stiglitz, J. E., & Greenwald, B. C. (2014). Creating a learning society: A new approach to growth, development, and social Progress. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32, 334–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A., & Pietronero, L. (2012). A new metrics for countries’ fitness and products’ complexity. Scientific Reports, 2, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Research DepartmentConfindustriaRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsCa’ Foscari UniversityVeneziaItaly

Personalised recommendations