Advertisement

Two Conceptions of Global Order

  • Lorenzo ZuccaEmail author
Chapter
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Trump’s America is dismantling the global order the United States helped to create. Meanwhile, China is emerging as the leading economic power. To affirm itself, China will have to rely on international institutions that facilitate trade and exchange with the rest of the world. When it comes to extending its influence in the world, China is thinking big and its New Silk Road project shows it. But China also needs to put forward its own vision of global order as an alternative to the existing orthodox conception, which is quickly losing legitimacy due to America’s attitude towards international institutions. The stage is set for a confrontation between two conceptions of global order, and we cannot exclude that the one to prevail will ultimately be China’s vision. This paper contrasts those two conceptions of global order and reflects on the possible scenarios for an uncertain future.

Keywords

Global order Constitution International law WTO China United States International institutions World order World economy Development EU Belt and Road Initiative New Silk Road Trade Trade wars Trump Xi Jinping World peace 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I greatly benefited from comments of the participants at the conference on Global Constitutionalism at IDC, Herzliya. I am particularly grateful to Adam Shinar, Michael Giudice, Federico Ortino for very helpful comments on the written text.

References

  1. Allison, Graham (2017), Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston and New York.Google Scholar
  2. Auslin, Michael (2017), The End of the Asian Century: War, Stagnation, and the Risks to the World’s Most Dynamic Region, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
  3. Bowring, Philip (2017), “China’s Silk Road Illusions”, in The New York Review of Books, 25 October 2017, available at: https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2017/10/25/chinas-silk-road-illusions/.
  4. Brunkhorst, Hauke (2018), “Some Conceptual and Structural Problems of Global Cosmopolitanism”, in Giri, Ananta Kumar (ed.), Beyond Cosmopolitanism: Towards Planetary Transformations, Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 299–326.Google Scholar
  5. Buckley, Chris (2018), “Xi Jinping Thought Explained: A New Ideology for a New Era”, in The New York Times, 26 February 2018, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/26/world/asia/xi-jinping-thought-explained-a-new-ideology-for-a-new-era.html.
  6. China Power (2019), “What Does China Really Spend on Its Military?”, available at: https://chinapower.csis.org/military-spending/.
  7. Davis, Christina (2018), “It Is Up to China to Save the Global Trading System”, in Financial Times, 9 March 2018, available at: https://www.ft.com/content/6d85636e-22ca-11e8–8138-569c3d7ab0a7.
  8. Dickens, Charles (1874), A Tale of Two Cities, Piccadilly, London.Google Scholar
  9. Dowdle, Michael (2010), “Of Comparative Constitutional Monocropping: A Reply to Qianfan Zhang”, in International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(4), 977–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott, Larry and Wearden, Graeme (2017), “Xi Jinping Signals China Will Champion Free Trade if Trump Builds Barriers”, in The Guardian, 18 January 2017, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/17/china-xi-jinping-china-free-trade-trump-globalisation-wef-davos.
  11. Epstein, Richard (2018), “The Wrong Rights, or: The Inescapable Weaknesses of Modern Liberal Constitutionalism”, in The University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2), 403–423.Google Scholar
  12. Fan, Jiayang (2018), “A New Silk Road: China Is Investing Billions in Building Pathways to Europe, Central Asia, and the Middle East”, in The New Yorker, 8 January 2018, available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/01/08/a-new-silk-road.
  13. Guo, Meixin et al. (2018), “The Day After Tomorrow: Evaluating the Burden of Trump’s Trade War”, in Asian Economic Papers, 17(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hancock, Tom (2018), “China Votes to Allow Xi Jinping to Rule for Life”, in Financial Times, 10 March 2018, available at: https://www.ft.com/content/bc8ab2bc-24fe-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0.
  15. Havercroft, Jonathan et al. (2018), “Editorial: Donald Trump as Global Constitutional Breaching Experiment”, in Global Constitutionalism, 7(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ignatieff, Michael (2017), The Ordinary Virtues: Moral Order in a Divided World, Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kant, Immanuel (1795), “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch”, available at https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm.
  18. Kaplan, Robert (1994), “The Coming Anarchy: How Scarcity, Crime, Overpopulation, Tribalism, and Disease Are Rapidly Destroying the Social Fabric of Our Planet”, in The Atlantic, February 1994, available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/02/the-coming-anarchy/304670/.
  19. Kissinger, Henry (2015), World Order, Penguin Books, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Kumm, Mattias et al. (2017), “Editorial: The End of the ‘West’ and the Future of Global Constitutionalism”, in Global Constitutionalism, 6 (1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin, Yan (2015), “Constitutional Evolution Through Legislation: The Quiet Transformation of China’s Constitution”, in International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(1), 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Little, Daniel (2018), The Paradox of Wealth and Poverty: Mapping the Ethical Dilemmas of Global Development, Routledge, New York and Oxon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Majie, Zhu (2002) “Deng Xiaoping’s Human Rights Theory”, in Xintian, Yu (ed.), Cultural Impact on International Relations, The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, Washington, DC, 79–90.Google Scholar
  24. Marcus, Jonathan (2018), “The ‘Globalisation’ of China’s Military Power”, in BBC News, 13 February 2018, available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-43036302.
  25. National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (2015), “Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road”, 28 March 2015, available at: https://reconasia-production.s3.amazonaws.com/media/filer_public/e0/22/e0228017–7463-46fc-9094-0465a6f1ca23/vision_and_actions_on_jointly_building_silk_road_economic_belt_and_21st-century_maritime_silk_road.pdf.
  26. Nathan, Andrew (2017), “The Chinese World Order”, in New York Review of Books, 12 October 2017, available at: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/10/12/chinese-world-order/.
  27. Parker, Ashley (2016), “Donald Trump Says NATO Is ‘Obsolete,’ UN is ‘Political Game”, in The New York Times, 2 April 2016, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/04/02/donald-trump-tells-crowd-hed-be-fine-if-nato-broke-up/.
  28. Peterson, John (2018), “Present at the Destruction? The Liberal Order in the Trump Era”, in The International Spectator, 53(1), 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Posen, Barry (2018), “The Rise of Illiberal Hegemony: Trump’s Surprising Grand Strategy”, in Foreign Affairs, 97(2), 20–27.Google Scholar
  30. Prakash, Aseem and Dolsak, Nives (2017), “International Organizations and the Crisis of Legitimacy”, in Open Global Rights, 9 June 2017, available at: https://www.openglobalrights.org/international-organizations-and-crisis-of-legitimacy/.
  31. Rosyadi, Saiful Alim and Widodo, Tri (2018), “Impact of Donald Trump’s Tariff Increase Against Chinese Imports on Global Economy: Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Model”, in Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 16(2), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scholl, Christian and Freyberg-Inan, Annette (2018), “Imagining Another Europe: Building a Pan-European Counter-Hegemonic Bloc Around an Anti-Austerity Master Frame”, in Comparative European Politics, 16(1), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stuenkel, Oliver (2017), Post-Western World: How Emerging Powers Are Remaking Global Order, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. The National Bureau of Asian Research (2020, May 8), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Political and Strategic Implications of a Chinese-led Regional Infrastructure, available at: https://www.nbr.org/program/chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-political-and-strategic-implications-of-a-chinese-led-regional-infrastructure/.
  35. Tingyang, Zhao (2011), The Tianxia System: An Introduction to the Philosophy of World Institution, China Renmin University Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
  36. Verma, S.K. (2018), “WTO and the Regulation of International Trade Law”, in Nirmal, B. C. and Singh, Rajnish (eds.), Contemporary Issues in International Law, Springer, Singapore, 263–272.Google Scholar
  37. Zhang, Qianfan (2010), “A Constitution Without Constitutionalism? The Paths of Constitutional Development in China”, in International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8 (4), 950–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang, Feng (2015), Chinese Hegemony: Grand Strategy and International Institutions in East Asian History, Stanford University Press, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zucca, Lorenzo (2012a), “Monism and Fundamental Rights”, in Dickson, Julie and Elefteriadis, Pavlos (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zucca, Lorenzo (2012b), A Secular Europe: Law and Religion in the European Constitutional Landscape, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations