Advertisement

The Differential Benefits of Cloud Computing for Small and Medium Versus Large Firms

  • Laxmi S. V. Gunupudi
  • Raijv KishoreEmail author
Chapter
  • 45 Downloads
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

Cloud computing is a fundamental shift in the way computing power is acquired and consumed. It is a special case of IS outsourcing where some IT-related tasks and resources are outsourced to cloud vendors. Cloud computing confers unique capabilities such as heterogeneity, scalability, accessibility, availability, consumption based pricing, fully managed and standardized services on the adopting organizations. These capabilities in-turn result in several strategic and operational benefits to the adopting organizations. However, these capabilities are not leveraged by all adopting firms uniformly. Firms utilize these capabilities based on their orientation towards exploration and exploitation. While SMEs are more aligned towards exploratory activities, large enterprises are inclined towards exploitation. Therefore, we posit that the SMEs and large enterprises accrue differential benefits from cloud adoption such that SMEs leverage cloud to attain strategic benefits and large enterprises seek operational benefits from cloud adoption. Through a survey based exploratory study we found that there is a systematic difference between SMEs and large enterprises in the way they leverage cloud capabilities. Based on the results, we deduce that managers of SMEs believe that they can use cloud computing for exploration and on the contrary, managers of large enterprises believe that they can use cloud computing for exploitation.

Keywords

Cloud computing Cloud adoption Strategic benefits Operational benefits Exploration Exploitation 

References

  1. Aljabre, A. (2012). Cloud computing for increased business value. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 234–239.Google Scholar
  2. Anthes, G. (2010). Security in the cloud. Communications of the ACM, 53(11).Google Scholar
  3. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., et al. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armbrust, M., Griffith, A. F. R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., … Zaharia, M. (2009). Above the clouds: A berkeley view of cloud computing. In UC Berkeley Reliable Adaptive Distributed Systems Laboratory.Google Scholar
  5. Aslam, U., Ullah, I., & Ansari, S. (2010). Open source private cloud computing. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2(7), 399–407.Google Scholar
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 459–489.Google Scholar
  7. Bardhan, I. R., Demirkan, H., Kannan, P., Kauffman, R. J., & Sougstad, R. (2010). An interdisciplinary perspective on IT services management and service science. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(4), 13–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.Google Scholar
  9. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 471–482.Google Scholar
  10. Brynjolfsson, E., Hofmann, P., & Jordan, J. (2010). Cloud Computing and Electricity: Beyond the utility model. Communications of the ACM, 53(5).Google Scholar
  11. Budrienė, D., & Zalieckaitė, L. (2012). Cloud computing application in small and medium-sized enterprises. Issues of Business & Law, 4.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell-Kelly, M. (2009). Historical reflections the rise, fall, and resurrection of software as a service. Communications of the ACM, 52(5), 28–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, M.-J., Kuo-Hsien, S., & Tsai, W. (2007). Competitive tension: The awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christauskas, C., & Miseviciene, R. (2012). Cloud-computing based accounting for small to medium sized business. Engineering Economics, 23(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Creeger, M. (2009). CTO roundtable: Cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 52(8), 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121.Google Scholar
  17. Debruyne, M., Moenaertb, R., Griffinc, A., Hartd, S., Hultinke, E. J., & Robben, H. (2002). The impact of new product launch strategies on competitive reaction in industrial markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demirkan, H., Kauffman, R. J., Vayghan, J. A., Fill, H.-G., Karagiannis, D., & Maglio, P. P. (2009). Service-oriented technology and management: Perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 356–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Derfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. M., & Smith, K. G. (2008). The Red Queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Durkee, D. (2010). Why cloud computing will never be free. Queue, 8(4), 20.Google Scholar
  21. Farah, S. (2010). Cloud computing or software as a service—which makes the most sense for HR? Employment Relations Today, 36(4), 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., & Lu, S. (2008). Cloud computing and grid computing 360° compared. In Paper presented at the Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE’08.Google Scholar
  23. Garrison, G., Kim, S., & Wakefield, R. L. (2012). Success factors for deploying cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 55(9), 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Géczy, P., Izumi, N., & Hasida, K. (2012). Cloudsourcing: Managing cloud adoption. Global Journal of Business Research (GJBR), 6(2).Google Scholar
  25. Glaser, J. (2011). Cloud computing can simplify HIT infrastructure management. Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, 65(8), 52.Google Scholar
  26. Goodburn, M. A., & Hill, S. (2010). The Cloud Transforms Business Cloud is not the future—It’s now. It’s an enabling force for business evolution that goes beyond technology, allowing organizations to more efficiently and effectively reengineer the company’s corporate strategy. For transformative power, the new model is blue—As in “sky.”. Financial Executive, 26(10), 34.Google Scholar
  27. Harry Katzan, J. (2010). On an ontological view of cloud computing. Journal of Service Science, 3(1).Google Scholar
  28. Iyer, B., & Henderson, J. C. (2010). Preparing for the future: Understanding the seven capabilities of cloud computing. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(2), 117–131.Google Scholar
  29. Iyer, B., & Henderson, J. C. (2012). Business value from clouds: Learning from users. MIS Quarterly Executive, 11(1), 51–60.Google Scholar
  30. Jamil, E. (2009). What really is SOA. A comparison with cloud computing, Web 2.0, SaaS, WOA, Web Services, PaaS and others. White Paper, Soalib Incorporated.Google Scholar
  31. Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of marketing, 56(4), 33–52.Google Scholar
  32. Kushida, K. E., Murray, J., & Zysman, J. (2011). Diffusing the cloud: Cloud computing and implications for public policy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11(3), 209–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (2013). Outsourcing business processes for innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3), 63.Google Scholar
  34. Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (2016). A new approach to automating services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 41.Google Scholar
  35. Leavitt, N. (2009). Is cloud computing really ready for prime time? Computer, 42(1), 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, R. P., & Chen, Q. (2009). The immediate impact of new product introductions on stock price: The role of firm resources and size. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 97–107.Google Scholar
  37. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112.Google Scholar
  38. Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial management & data systems, 111(7), 1006–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
  40. Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing—The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of cloud computing.Google Scholar
  42. Miller, D., & Chen, M.-J. (1994). Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the US airline industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–23.Google Scholar
  43. Mircea, M., Ghilic-Micu, B., & Stoica, M. (2011). Combining business intelligence with cloud computing to delivery agility in actual economy. Journal of Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies, 45(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
  44. Misra, S. C., & Mondal, A. (2011). Identification of a company’s suitability for the adoption of cloud computing and modelling its corresponding return on investment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(3), 504–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014). Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & Management, 51(5), 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Owens, D. (2010). Securing elasticity in the cloud. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poslad, S. (2011). Ubiquitous computing: smart devices, environments and interactions, Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Rai, A., Pavlou, P. A., Im, G., & Du, S. (2012). Interfirm IT capability profiles and communications for cocreating relational value: Evidence from the logistics industry. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sako, M. (2012). Business models for strategy and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 55(7).Google Scholar
  50. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 237–263.Google Scholar
  51. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  52. Steininger, D. M. (2019). Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT-associated and digital entrepreneurship research. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 363–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Subramani, M. (2004). How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 45–73.Google Scholar
  54. Vaquero, L. M., Rodero-Merino, L., Caceres, J., & Lindner, M. (2008). A break in the clouds: Towards a cloud definition. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yoo, C. S. (2011). Cloud computing: Architectural and policy implications. Review of Industrial Organization, 38(4), 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Youseff, L., Butrico, M., & Silva, D. D. (2008). Toward a unified ontology of cloud computing. In Paper presented at the Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE ‘08.Google Scholar
  57. Zahra, S. A., Nielsen, A. P., & Bogner, W. C. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competence development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(3), 169–169.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Management BangaloreBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Management, Entrepreneurship & Technology Department, University of NevadaLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations