Advertisement

The Virtue of Dialogue

  • Lauren Swayne Barthold
Chapter
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

If one major driver of the polarization that shuts down discourse is constructing negative stories around and privileging distinct rather than shared social identities, then we need to take a closer look at the social and epistemic power dynamics at play in such discourse. We need to scrutinize the social and epistemic factors that lead to the silencing of groups marginalized specifically due to their social identities. This chapter begins by considering Miranda Fricker’s claim that epistemic injustice is a central vice that implicitly functions to silence marginalized groups, as well as her claim that the way to counter this vice is through the epistemic virtues of testimonial and hermeneutic justice. Drawing on critiques of Fricker’s work (like those by Elizabeth Anderson) as well as Gadamer’s account of openness, I defend openness as a key virtue for promoting discursive equality, one that applies to the individual but that has repercussions for attenuating structural inequalities. I end the chapter appealing to Dewey’s account of democracy to demonstrate the central role civic dialogue can play in cultivating the civic habits and virtues necessary for fostering a more just democracy.

Keywords

Epistemic injustice Hermeneutic injustice Epistemic virtue Open-mindedness Openness Elizabeth Anderson John Dewey Civic dialogue Civic virtue Intellectual humility Democracy Social identities 

Bibliography

  1. Adler, Jonathan. 2004. Reconciling Open-Mindedness and Belief. Theory and Research in Education 2 (2): 127–142.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878504043440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2010. Miranda Fricker’s Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Episteme: 128–137.  https://doi.org/10.3366/E1742360010000869.
  3. Anderson, Elizabeth. 2006. The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3 (1–2): 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2010. The Imperative of Integration. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2012. Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions. Social Epistemology 26 (2): 163–173.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baehr, Jason. 2011. The Inquiring Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barber, Benjamin R. 2003. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barker, Derek W.M. 2017. Deliberative Justice and Collective Identity: A Virtues-Centered Perspective. Political Theory 45 (1): 116–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Battaly, Heather. forthcoming. Can Close-mindedness be an Intellectual Virtue? Vol 85 of the Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, Harms and Wrongs in Epistemic Practice, edited by Simon Barker, Charlie Crerar, and Trystan Goetze. Draft https://www.academia.edu/36683274/Can_Closed-mindedness_be_an_Intellectual_Virtue?email_work_card=view-paper. Accessed 26 Aug 2019.
  10. Coleman, Peter T. 2011. The Five Percent Conflict. 2011. The Five Percent: Finding Solutions to Seemingly Impossible Conflicts. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  11. Dessel, Adrienne, Mary E. Rogge, and Sarah B. Garlington. 2006. Using Intergroup Dialogue to Promote Social Justice and Change. Social Work 51 (4): 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewey, John. 1939. Creative Democracy: The Task before us. The Later Works 14: 227–233.Google Scholar
  13. Gergen, Kenneth J., Sheila McNamee, and Frank Barrett. 2001. Toward a Vocabulary of Transformative Dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration 24: 607–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  15. Isaacs, William. 1999. Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. New York: Currency.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson, Liz. 2008. Dialogic Pedagogy for Social Justice. Studies of Philosophical Education 27: 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laden, Anthony Simon. 2012a. Reasoning: A Social Picture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2012b. Taking the Engagement in Civic Engagement Seriously. Published by the UIC Institute on Politics and Civic Engagement, on their website: http://www.uic.edu/cuppa/ipce/interior/TakingCivicEngagementSeriouslyFinalFY12.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2017.
  19. Lukianoff, Greg, and Jonathan Haidt. 2015. The Coddling of the American Mind. The Atlantic. September. Accessed: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/
  20. Margonis, Frank. 2007. John Dewey, W.E.B. Du Bois, and Alain Locke: A Case Study in White Ignorance and Intellectual Segregation. In Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance, ed. Shannon Sullivan and Nancy Tuana. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  21. McPhail, Mark Lawrence. 2004. Race and the (Im)Possibility of Dialogue. In Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. Rob Anderson, Lesilie A. Baxter, and Kenneth N. Cissna. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Mutz, Diana. 2007. Hearing the Other Side. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Saslow, Eli. 2018. Rising out of Hatred: The Awakening of a Former White Nationalist. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Sherman, Benjamin R. 2016. There’s no (Testimonial) Justice: Why Pursuit of a Virtue Is Not the Solution to Epistemic Injustice. Social Epistemology 30 (3): 229–250.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2015.1031852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spiegel, James S. 2012. Open-mindedness and intellectual humility. Theory and Research in Education 10 (1): 27–38.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878512437472
  26. Talisse, Robert B. 2011. A Farewell to Deweyan Democracy. Political Studies 59: 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2007. Democratic Potential of Civic Dialogue. In Deliberation, Participation, and Democracy, ed. Shawn W. Rosenberg. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren Swayne Barthold
    • 1
  1. 1.Liberal ArtsEndicott CollegeBeverlyUSA

Personalised recommendations