Advertisement

The Roots of Dialogue

  • Lauren Swayne Barthold
Chapter
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Leading dialogue theorist and practitioner William Isaacs, like other dialogue practitioners in the field he helped found, based his work on Martin Buber’s principle of fundamental relationality and reiterated Buber when he proclaimed, “in the beginning was the relationship.” This chapter examines how Buber’s dialogic ontology, based on the fundamental relationality of humans, can be used to ground a theory of dialogue able to deal with divisive civic discourse plagued by polarization. Buber’s emphasis accords with John Dewey’s, who also recognized the way in which our fundamental relationality can provide the grounds and motivation for a more intentional democratic community. Dewey described how “we are born organic beings associated with others, but we are not born members of a community.” Both Buber and Dewey affirm that the fundamental connection shared by all humans needs to be actualized and put into practice through concrete dialogic relations if we are to achieve a viable pluralistic community.

Keywords

Dialogue Martin Buber I and Thou I-Thou Maurice Merleau-Ponty Relationality Dialogic relationship Event Experience 

Bibliography

  1. Avnon, Dan. 1998. Martin Buber: The Hidden Dialogue. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, Roy F. and Mark R. Leary. 1995. The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Pscyhological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529.Google Scholar
  3. Buber, Martin. 1958. I and Thou, second edition with a postscript by the author, trans. Ronald Gregor Smith. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1965. Knowledge of Man, edited with an introduction by Maurice Friedman. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1967. Reply to my Critics. In The Philosophy of Martin Buber, ed. Schilpp and Maurice Friedman. Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1995. Ich und Du. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2002. Dialogue. In Between Man and Man, trans. Ronald Gregor-Smith, with an introduction by Maurice Friedman. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, John. 2016. The Public and its Problems. Edited and with an Introduction by Melvin Rogers. Ohio: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, Maurice. 1965. Introductory Essay. In The Knowledge of Man, ed. Martin Buber. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  10. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1992. Truth and Method. Second Revised Edition, trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  11. Gergen, Kenneth J. 1994. Realities and Relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Grondin, Jean. 2003. Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Biography, trans. Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Isaacs, William. 1999. Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. New York: Currency.Google Scholar
  14. Kepnes, Steven. 1992. The Text as Thou. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Levinas. 1967. Martin Buber and the Theory of Knowledge. In The Philosophy of Martin Buber, ed. Paul Arthur Schilpp and Maurice Friedman. Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
  16. Marcel, Gabriel. 1967. I and Thou. In The Philosophy of Martin Buber, ed. Paul Arthur Schilpp and Maurice Friedman. Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
  17. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. The Primacy of Perception, edited with an introduction by James Edie. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1994. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. from the French by Colin Smith. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Pfuetze, Paul E. 1967. Buber and American Pragmatism. In The Philosophy of Martin Buber, ed. Paul Arthur Schilpp and Maurice Friedman. Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
  20. Silberstein, Laurence J. 1989. Martin Buber’s Social and Religious Thought. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  21. Stains, Robert R., Jr. 2012. Reflection for Connection: Deepening Dialogue Through Reflective Processes. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 30 (1): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stockman, Tom. 2015. Open Dialogue: A New Approach to Mental Healthcare, Psychology Today Blog July 12, https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/hide-and-seek/201507/open-dialogue new-approach-mental-healthcare. Accessed 30 June 17.
  23. Strathern, Marilyn. 2005. In Other People’s Shoes. In After Terror, ed. Ahmed Akbar and Brian Forst. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Zank, Michael, and Zachary Braiterman. 2014. Martin Buber. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/buber/

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren Swayne Barthold
    • 1
  1. 1.Liberal ArtsEndicott CollegeBeverlyUSA

Personalised recommendations