Advertisement

Disrupting Social Constructions in the Profession of Arms

  • Vanessa BrownEmail author
  • Al Okros
Chapter
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

As highlighted in other chapters, the military profession is subject to both internal and external pressures to evolve. This chapter will examine key issues in two parts. The first portion reviews the factors that are generating these pressures with consideration of four dimensions. The first comes from the integration of gender perspectives arising from endorsement of the Women, Peace, and Security agenda. The second arises from the requirements to address issues of sexual harassment within the military or, more broadly, to meet the expectations of Canadian society about how those in uniform at treated. The third results from the Canadian military aspirations to implement an inclusive diversity strategy that calls for changes in key aspects of professional identity and professional functioning. The second portion of this chapter presents observations by the authors of the consequences of exposing mid-level career officers with concepts that serve to challenge the received professional worldview. The primary implication offered is that these leaders are being encouraged to reconsider key aspects of social construction particularly regarding power, social privilege and the reproduction of the identity, norms, values and beliefs that underpin the military ethos.

Keywords

Profession of arms Professional military education Gender perspectives Social construction Identity Power Social privilege Women, peace, and security 

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, A. (2002). The army and the theory of professions. In D. Snider & G. Watkins (Eds.), The future of the army profession (pp. 523–536). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Ashe, F. (2012). Gendering war and peace: Militarized masculinities in Northern Ireland. Men and Masculinities, 15(3), 230–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auditor General of Canada. (2018). 2018 fall reports of the Auditor General of Canada to the Parliament of Canada: Report 5—Inappropriate sexual behaviour—Canadian armed forces. Ottawa, ON: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Beier, J. M. (2006). Outsmarting technologies: Rhetoric, revolutions in military affairs, and the social depth of warfare. International Politics, 43(2), 266–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, J. W., & Sam, D. L. (1997). Acculturation and adaptation. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagicibaci (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 291–326)., Social behavior and application Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Bishwakarma, R., Hunt, V. H., & Zajicek, A. (2007). Educating Dalit women: Beyond a one-dimensional policy formulation. Himalaya, XXVI(1–2), 27–39.Google Scholar
  8. Branswell, B. C., Harnett, S., Nolen, B., Bergman, J., Geddes, J., O’Hara, J., & Deziel, S. (2003, March 17). More rape in the military. Maclean’s.Google Scholar
  9. Brose, C. (2019). The new revolution in military affairs: War’s sci-fi future. Foreign Affairs, 98(3), 68–73.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, V. (2017). “I was furious that whole roto.” Report on gender dynamics and hidden learning Joint Command and Staff Programme (Residential) 43 Institutional Policy Studies. Reported submitted to Canadian Forces College, August 2017.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, V. (2018, August). Report on the integration of gender and cultural perspectives and an inclusive learning environment in the Joint Command and Staff Programme. Kingston, ON: Reported submitted to Canadian Forces College.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, V. (draft). Integrating gender and cultural perspectives in Canada’s professional military education: Transforming military culture through informed leadership. Draft doctoral thesis, Carleton University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Google Scholar
  13. Brown, V., & Okros, A. (2018a, May–June). Preparing military leaders to achieve the objectives of the women, peace and security agenda. Paper presented at the 2018 Women Peace and Security Conference: Promoting Global Leadership, Brown University.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, V., & Okros, A. (2018b). New leaders, “new wars”: A reflective approach to applying gender and cultural perspectives. In D. Watola & A. MacIntyre (Eds.), From knowing to doing: International perspectives on leading effectively (pp. 235–289). Kingston, ON: Canadian Defence Academy Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, V., & Okros, A. (2019). Dancing around gender: Changing identity in Canada’s post-Deschamps military. In H. C. Breede (Ed.), Culture and the soldier: Identities, values, and norms in military engagements. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chief of the Defence Staff. (2009a). Duty with honour: The profession of arms in Canada. Kingston, ON: Canadian Forces Leadership Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Chief of the Defence Staff. (2009b). Canadian military doctrine (CFJP 01). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Forces Experimentation Centre.Google Scholar
  18. Chief of the Defence Staff. (2015, August). Op Order—Op HONOUR. Ottawa, ON: Chief of the Defence Staff.Google Scholar
  19. Chief of the Defence Staff. (2016a, January). Directive for integrating UNSCR 1325 and related resolutions into CAF planning and operations. Ottawa, ON: Chief of the Defence Staff.Google Scholar
  20. Chief of the Defence Staff. (2016b). Canadian armed forces diversity strategy. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Rights and Diversity.Google Scholar
  21. Chief of the Defence Staff. (2019). Canadian armed forces progress report addressing sexual misconduct. Ottawa, ON: Chief of Defence Staff Strategic Response Team—Sexual Misconduct.Google Scholar
  22. Cockburn, C. (2010). Gender relations as causal in militarization and war: A feminist standpoint. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12(2), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford U. P.Google Scholar
  24. Debusscher, P. (2015). Evaluation of the Beijing Platform for Action +20 and the opportunities for achieving gender equality and the empowerment of women in the post-2015 development agenda. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  25. Deschamps, M. [External Review Authority] (2015). External review into sexual misconduct and sexual harassment in the Canadian Armed Forces. Ottawa, ON: Department of National Defence.Google Scholar
  26. Duncanson, C. (2015). Hegemonic masculinity and the possibility of change in gender relations. Men & Masculinities, 18(2), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duriesmith, D. (2016). Masculinity and new war: The gendered dynamics of contemporary armed conflict. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eichler, M. (2014). Militarized masculinities in international relations. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(1), 81–92.Google Scholar
  29. Feaver, P. (1996). The civil–military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the question of civilian control. Armed Forces and Society, 23(2), 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fullana, J., Pallisera, M., Colomer, J., Fernández Peña, R., & Pérez-Burriel, M. (2016). Reflective learning in higher education: A qualitative study on students’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 1008–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gelfand, M. (2018). Rule makers, rule breakers: How tight and loose cultures wire our world. New York, NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
  32. Global Affairs Canada. (2017). Gender equality: A foundation for peace. Canada’s National Action Plan 2017–2022: For the implementation of the UN Security Council resolutions on women, peace and security. Ottawa, ON: Global Affairs Canada.Google Scholar
  33. Hankivsky, O. (2012). The lexicon of mainstreaming equality: Gender based analysis (GBA), gender and diversity analysis (GDA) and intersectionality based analysis (IBA). Canadian Political Science Review, 6(2–3), 171–183.Google Scholar
  34. Higate, P. (2007). Peacekeepers, masculinities, and sexual exploitation. Men and Masculinities, 10(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holland, K. J., Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Sexual assault training in the military: Evaluating efforts to end the “invisible war”. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(3–4), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hughes, M., & Miklaucic, M. (Eds.). (2015). Impunity: Countering illicit power in war and transition. Washington, DC: National Defense U. P.Google Scholar
  37. Huntington, S. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil–military relations. New York, NY: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  38. Janowitz, M. (1960). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kaldor, M. (2012). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kaldor, M., & Vashee, B. (Eds.). (1997). New wars. London, UK: Pinter.Google Scholar
  41. Liddell Hart, B. H. (1944). Thoughts on war. London, UK: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  42. Masters, C. (2005). Bodies of technology: Cyborg soldiers and militarized masculinities. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(1), 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matfess, H., & Miklaucic, M. (Eds.). (2016). Beyond convergence: World without order. Washington, DC: National Defense U. P.Google Scholar
  44. Mello, P. A. (2017). “New” and “old” wars. In P. I. Joseph (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of war: Social science perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Mercier, N., & Castonguay, A. (2014, May 16). Our military’s disgrace. Maclean’s.Google Scholar
  46. Miklaucic, M., & Brewer, J. (2013). Convergence: Illicit networks and national security in the age of globalization. Washington, DC: National Defense U. P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morgan, P. M. (2008). The impact of the revolution in military affairs. Journal of Strategic Studies, 23(1), 132–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Münkler, H. (2005). The new wars (P. Camiller, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  49. Muzio, D., Brock, D. M., & Suddaby, R. (2013). Professions and institutional change: Towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. Journal of Management Studies, 50(5), 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2017, October 17). SH/SAG/GEN/JC/17-317874/1 and TSC-GSL-0010/TT-170733/Ser: 0761, Bi-Strategic Command Directive 40-1 Integrating UNSCR 1325 and Gender Perspective into the NATO Command Structure.Google Scholar
  51. O’Hara, J., Branswell, B., Geddes, J., Deziel, S., Doyle Driedger. S., & Nolen, S. (1998, May 25). Rape in the military. Maclean’s.Google Scholar
  52. Okros, A. C. (2009). Rethinking “diversity” and “security”. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 47(4), 346–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Okros, A. C. (2010). Leadership in the Canadian military context. Kingston, ON: Canadian Forces Leadership Institute.Google Scholar
  54. Okros, A. C. (2019, May 28). Women in the Canadian armed forces. Testimony before the House of Commons Standing Committee on the Status of Women, Ottawa, ON. In K. Vecchio (Chair), A force for change: Creating a culture of equality for women in the Canadian Armed Forces (Report of the Committee on the Status of Women). Ottawa, ON: Parliament of Canada.Google Scholar
  55. Okros, A. C. (in press). Introspection on diversity in the Canadian armed forces. In A. Edgar, R. Mangat, & B. Momani (Eds.), Strengthening the Canadian armed forces through diversity and inclusion (pp. 101–110). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  56. Parpart, J., & Partridge, K. (2014). Soldiering on: Pushing militarized masculinities into new territory. In M. Evans, C. Hemmings, & M. Henry (Eds.), The Sage handbook of feminist theory (pp. 550–565). London, UK: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paterson, S. (2010). What’s the problem with gender-based analysis? Gender mainstreaming policy and practice in Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 53(3), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pelto, P. J. (1968). The differences between “tight” and “loose” societies. Trans-Actions, 37–40.Google Scholar
  59. Price, B. (2017). Military culture. In P. Joseph (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of war: Social science perspectives (pp. 1096–1099). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Razack, R. (2004). Dark threats and white knights: The Somalia Affair, peacekeeping, and the new imperialism. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto P.Google Scholar
  61. Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2013). Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 244–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sjoberg, L. (2011). Gender, the state, and war redux: Feminist international relations across the “levels of analysis”. International Relations, 25(1), 108–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Status of Women Canada. (2018). Gender based analysis plus: Research guide. Retrieved from https://cfc-swc.gc.ca/gba-acs/index-en.html.
  64. Supreme Court of Canada. (1987). Robichaud versus Canada (Treasury Board). Ottawa; ON: Supreme Court of Canada (2 SCR 84).Google Scholar
  65. Taber, N. (2009). The profession of arms: Ideological codes and dominant narratives of gender in the Canadian military. Atlantis, 34(1), 27–36.Google Scholar
  66. Tiessen, R. (2015). Gender essentialism in Canadian foreign aid commitments to women, peace, and security. International Journal, 70(1), 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Beveren, L., Roets, G., Buysse, A., & Rutten, K. (2018). We all reflect, but why? A systematic review of the purposes of reflection in higher education in social and behavioral sciences. Educational Research Review, 24(2), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitworth, S. (2005). Militarized masculinities and the politics of peacekeeping: The Canadian case. In K. Booth (Ed.), Critical security studies and world politics (pp. 89–106). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  69. Woodward, R., & Winter, T. (2007). Sexing the soldier: The politics of gender and the contemporary British Army. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Government 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dallaire Centre of Excellence for Peace and SecurityDepartment of National DefenceTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations