‘To Breathe the Dust of This Painted Life’: Modes of Engaging the Senses in Vladimir Nabokov’s Invitation to a Beheading

  • Lilla Farmasi


In this chapter, I explore the modes that engage sense perceptions of the reader in Invitation to a Beheading. Several scenes from this novel can be interpreted as representations of experiences of a heavily corporeal nature, such as fear and anxiety. Besides the author’s astonishing techniques of depicting ordinary and synaesthetic sense perceptions and his extraordinary vocabulary, the patterns of dynamic structures and mechanisms of human perception sometimes seem to structure and motivate the whole of his texts as well as the plots of his novels. My aim is to examine where sense perceptions are traceable in Nabokov’s prose and what can their function be in a narrative when it comes to the formulation of storyworlds and the production of meaning. I aim at further developing the dialog between cognitive theories and literary theory to better understand the complex relationship between the human consciousness and body, and literary narratives.


  1. Barlassina, Luca, and Robert M. Gordon. 2017. Folk Psychology as Mental Simulation. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed 7 July 2017.
  2. Bortolussi, Marisa, and Peter Dixon. 2003. Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, Brian. 2011. Stalking Nabokov: Selected Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caracciolo, Marco. 2014. The Experientiality of Narrative: An Enactivist Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gomel, Elena. 2014. Narrative Space and Time: Representing Impossible Topologies in Literature. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamilton, Craig A., and Ralf Schneider. 2002. From Iser to Turner and Beyond: Reception Theory Meets Cognitive Criticism. Style 36 (4): 640–658.Google Scholar
  7. Herman, David (ed.). 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2013. Storytelling and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hetényi, Zsuzsa. 2015. Nabokov regényösvényein. Budapest: Kalligram Kiadó.Google Scholar
  10. Horváth, Márta. 2011. “Megtestesült olvasás”– A kognitív narratológia empirikus alapjai [Embodied Reading—The Empirical Roots of Cognitive Narratology]. Literatura 37 (1): 3–16.Google Scholar
  11. Nabokov, Vladimir. 1959. Invitation to a Beheading. Reprint, London: Penguin Classics, 2010.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1966. Speak, Memory. An Autobiography Revisited. Reprint, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1973. Strong Opinions. Reprint, London: Penguin Classics, 2011.Google Scholar
  14. Nünning, Ansgar. 2003. Narratology or Narratologies? Taking Stock of Recent Developments, Critique and Modest Proposals for Future Usages of the Term. In What Is Narratology? Questions and Answers Regarding the Status of a Theory, ed. Tom Kindt and Hans-Harald Müller, 239–276. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  15. Poe, Edgar Allan. 1842. The Pit and the Pendulum. Reprint. In Selected Poetry and Prose of Edgar Allan Poe, ed. T.O. Mabbott, 230–233. New York: The Modern Library, 1951.Google Scholar
  16. Szabó, Erzsébet. 2012. A narratívák olvasásának kognitív modellálása [Cognitive Modelling of the Reading of Narratives]. Literatura 38 (2): 115–125.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lilla Farmasi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SzegedSzegedHungary

Personalised recommendations