Advertisement

Narrative Subscription

  • Hugh T. MillerEmail author
Chapter
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

How does one come to subscribe to one policy narrative and not another? This chapter articulates a process of “identification-with” that evokes past experience in referent groups where common understandings and conventions picked up in social life are associated with a policy narrative. These associations and identifications are malleable over time. One may unsubscribe to a policy narrative, and one’s commitments to a narrative can vary in intensity of emotional commitment and value resonance. Narrative subscription also depends on context, whether historical, cultural, or situational. Change of context can bring about a change of aspect.

Keywords

Affect Identity Identification Referent group Change of context 

References

  1. Boscarino, Jessica E. 2016. Setting the Record Straight: Frame Contestation as an Advocacy Tactic. Policy Studies Journal 44 (3): 280–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bridgman, Todd, and David Barry. 2002. Regulation Is Evil: An Application of Narrative Policy Analysis to Regulatory Debate in New Zealand. Policy Sciences 35 (2): 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, Andrew D. 2006. A Narrative Approach to Collective Identities. Journal of Management Studies 43 (4): 731–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brubaker, Rogers, and Frederick Cooper. 2000. Beyond “Identity”. Theory and Society 29 (1): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, John L. 2002. Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, Robert Henry, and Daniel Béland. 2013. Valence, Policy Ideas, and the Rise of Sustainability. Governance 26 (2): 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Creed, Douglas W.E., Bryant Ashley Hudson, Gerardo A. Okhuysen, and Kristin Smith-Crowe. 2014. Swimming in a Sea of Shame: Incorporating Emotion into Explanations of Institutional Reproduction and Change. Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodge, Jennifer. 2016. Crowded Advocacy: Framing Dynamics in the Fracking Controversy in New York. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 25 (5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9800-6. Accessed 23 June 2019.
  9. Dodge, Jennifer, and Jeongyoon Lee. 2015. Framing Dynamics and Policy Gridlock: The Curious Case of Hydraulic Fracturing in New York. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1116378 (online first). Accessed 23 June 2019.
  10. Dufton, Emily. 2017. Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Ewick, Patricia, and Susan Silbey. 1995. Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative. Law & Society Review 29 (2): 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer, Frank. 1995. Evaluation Public Policy. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer, Frank. 2019. Knowledge Politics and Post-Truth in Climate Denial: On the Social Construction of Alternative Facts. Critical Policy Studies 13 (2): 133–152.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2019.1602067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, Walter R. 1984. Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument. Communication Monographs 51 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, Walter R. 1985. The Narrative Paradigm: An Elaboration. Communication Monographs 52 (4): 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hajer, Maarten A. 2005. Coalitions, Practices, and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE (Chapter 12). In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, ed. David Howarth and Jacob Torfing, 297–315. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hogg, Michael A., Deborah J. Terry, and Katherine M. White. 1995. A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 58 (4): 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hornung, Johanna, Nils C. Bandelow, and Colette S. Vogeler. 2019. Social Identities in the Policy Process. Policy Sciences 52 (2): 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howarth, David. 2010. Power, Discourse, and Policy: Articulating a Hegemony Approach to Critical Policy Studies. Critical Policy Studies 3 (3–4): 309–335.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaplan, Jonas T., Sarah I. Gimbel, and Sam Harris. 2016. Neural Correlates of Maintaining One’s Political Beliefs in the Face of Counterevidence. Scientific Reports.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lejano, Raul P., and Jennifer Dodge. 2017. The Narrative Properties of Ideology: The Adversarial Turn and Climate Skepticism in the U.S. Policy Sciences 50: 195–215.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9274-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCarthy, John, and R.A. Cramb. 2009. Policy Narratives, Landholder Engagement, and Oil Palm Expansion on the Malaysian and Indonesian Frontiers. The Geographical Journal 175 (2): 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merry, Melissa K. 2016. Constructing Policy Narratives in 140 Characters or Less: The Case of Gun Policy Organizations. Policy Studies Journal 44 (4): 373–395.Google Scholar
  25. Metze, Tamara, and Jennifer Dodge. 2016. Dynamic Discourse Coalitions on Hydro-Fracking in Europe and the United States. Environmental Communication 10 (3): 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norval, Aletta J. 2006. Democratic Identification: A Wittgensteinian Approach. Political Theory 34 (2): 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paterson, Stephanie. 2010. Feminizing Obstetrics or Medicalizing Midwifery? The Discursive Constitution of Midwifery in Ontario, Canada. Critical Policy Studies 4 (2): 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts, Mark. 2018. Communication Breakdown: Understanding the Role of Policy Narratives in Political Conflict and Consensus. Critical Policy Studies 12 (1): 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skilling, Peter. 2012. Immigration Policy in New Zealand: Divergent Narratives, Shared Assumptions and National Identity. Critical Policy Studies 6 (4): 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skilling, Peter. 2014. Everyday Emergency: Crisis, Unease and Strategy in Contemporary Political Discourse. Critical Policy Studies 8 (1): 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2005. Passions of Identification: Discourse, Enjoyment, and European Identity (Chapter 2). In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, ed. David Howarth and Jacob Torfing. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Stets, Jan E. 2005. Examining Emotions in Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stets, Jan E., and Peter J. Burke. 2003. Chapter 7. In Handbook of Self and Identity, ed. Mark R. Leary and June Price Tangney, 128–152. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Stone, Deborah. 2012. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  35. Wager, Tor D., Lisa Feldman Barrett, Eliza Bliss-Moreau, Kristen A. Lindquist, Seth Duncan, Hedy Kober, Josh Joseph, Matthew Davidson, and Jennifer Mize. 2010. The Neuroimaging of Emotion (Chapter 15). In Handbook of Emotions, 3rd ed., ed. Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, and Lisa Feldman Barrett. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Weible, Christopher M., and Tanya Heikkila. 2017. Policy Conflict Framework. Policy Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9280-6. Accessed 23 June 2019.
  37. Yanow, Dvora. 1996. How Does a Policy Mean? Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Zembylas, Michalinos. 2005. Discursive Practices, Genealogies, and Emotional Rules: A Poststructuralist View on Emotion and Identity in Teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education 21: 935–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public AdministrationFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations