Simulation and Optimization of Hoa Cam Wastewater Treatment Plant

  • Dinh Huan NguyenEmail author
  • M. A. Latifi
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


The study carried out measurement survey of HoaCam wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in DaNang City, Vietnam. Based on ASM1 model, simulation of this wastewater treatment plant is implemented to determine relative parameters of the model in Vietnamese conditions closest to the measurement results. After that, optimization of the design and operation of the WWTP to have more efficiency. The simulation results show that it is quite accurate with the actual operation conditions of HoaCam WWTP. The optimization results show that the construction size is greatly reduced compared to the actual design of the HoaCam WWTP. This shows that the HoaCam plant has a waste of investment and energy consumption without meeting discharge standards.


Simulation Optimization Wastewater treatment plant WWTP ASM1 model 


  1. Alasino N, Mussati MC, Scenna N (2007) Wastewater treatment plant synthesis and design. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(23):7497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alex J et al (2001) The COST simulation benchmark: description and simulator manual. COST Action 624 and COST Action 682Google Scholar
  3. Chachuat B, Roche N, Latifi MA (2001) Dynamic optimisation of small size wastewater treatment plants including nitrification and denitrification processes. Comput Chem Engng 25:585–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chachuat B, Roche N, Latifi MA (2005a) Long-term optimal aeration strategies for small-size alternating activated sludge treatment plants wastewater treatment plants. Chem Engng Proc 44:593–606Google Scholar
  5. Chachuat B, Roche N, Latifi MA (2005b) Optimal aeration control of industrial alternating activated sludge plants. Biochem Engng J 23:277–289Google Scholar
  6. Cuthrell JE, Biegler LT (1987) On the optimization of differential-algebraic process systems. AIChE J 33(8):257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuthrell JE, Biegler LT (1989) Simultaneous optimization and solution methods for batch reactor control profiles. Comput Chem Eng 13(1/2):49Google Scholar
  8. Fikar M, Chachuat B, Latifi MA (2005) Optimal operation of alternating activated sludge processes. Cont Engng Pract 13:857–861Google Scholar
  9. Gillot S et al (1999) Optimization wastewater treatment plant design and operation using simulation and cost analysis. In: 72nd annual conference WEFTEC 1999, 9–13 October, New Orleans, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Goh CJ, Teo KL (1988) Control parameterization: a unified approach to optimal control problems with general constraints. Automatica 24:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. gProms (1997–2009) Process systems enterprise.
  12. Gujer W, Henze M, Mino T, van Loosdrecht MCM (1999) Activated sludge model no. 3. Water Sci Technol 39(1)Google Scholar
  13. Henze M et al (1987) Activated sludge model no. 1. Technical Report 1, IAWQ, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Henze M et al (1995) Activated sludge model no. 2. IAWQ Scientific and Technical Report No. 3, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Henze M et al (1999) Activated sludge model no. 2D, ASM2D. Water Sci Technol 39(1):165–182Google Scholar
  16. Manh LD, Thuy LTL (2014) Study on beer wastewater treatmentGoogle Scholar
  17. Nguyen NX, Hai PH (2003) Theory and modeling of biological wastewater treatment processGoogle Scholar
  18. Teo KL, Goh CJ, Wong KH (1991) A unified computational approach to optimal control problems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Science and Technology—The University of DanangDanangVietnam
  2. 2.University of LorraineNancyFrance

Personalised recommendations