Advertisement

Assessment of the Rudnaya River Geochemical Barriers Water Composition Using Physico-Chemical Modeling Method (Dalnegorsk Ore District, Russia)

  • Konstantin R. FrolovEmail author
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

The article shows the results of Rudnaya River geochemical barriers water composition assessment with the physicochemical modeling method. 24 cases of physichochemical (redox) type barriers were simulated and considered. The obtained pH characteristics of geochemical barriers water have neutral level, maximum TDS are observed in January 2019. The investigation shows seasonal quantitative and qualitative composition geochemical barriers for two drainage discharges of Dalnegorsk ore region tailing dumps. The qualitative distribution of elements and pieces for in situ Rudnaya River water composition are shown.

Keywords

Acid mine drainage Drainage water River water Water composition assessment Geochemical barrier Tailings dumps Physicochemical modeling Supergenesis Hypergenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-35-00114.

References

  1. Charykova M, Krivovichev V, Depmeir W (2010) Thermodynamics of arsenates, selenites, and sulfates in the oxidation zone of sulfide ores: I. Thermodynamic constants at ambient conditions. Geol Ore Deposits 52(8):689–700Google Scholar
  2. Chudnenko K (2010) Thermodynamic modeling in geochemistry: theory, algorithms, software, applications. Geo, NovosibirskGoogle Scholar
  3. Frolov K, Lysenko A, Pyatakov A (2019) A Study of the qualitative chemical composition of technogenic waters in the tailing dumps of the Russian Southern Far East in a wide temperature range using the physicochemical modeling method. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 272(2):022124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Helgeson H, Kirkham D, Flowers G (1981) Theoretical prediction of the thermodynamic behavior of aqueous electrolytes at high pressures and temperatures: calculation of activity coefficients, osmotic coefficients, and apparent molal and standard and relative partial molal properties to 600°C and 5 Kb. Am J Sci 281:1249–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horne R (1969) Marine chemistry. The structure of water and the chemistry of the hydrosphere. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Jambor J (1994) Mineralogy of Sulfide-rich tailings and their oxidation products. Mineral Assoc Can 22:59–102Google Scholar
  7. Johnson J, Oelkers E, Helgeson H (1992) SUPCRT92: a software package for calculating the standard molal thermodynamic properties of minerals, gases, aqueous species, and reactions from 1 to 5000 bar and 0–1000 °C. Comput Geosci 18:899–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Perel’man A (1986) Geochemical barriers: theory and practical applications. Appl Geochem 1(6):669–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shock E (2012) SUPCRT 1992–1998 Database Geopig, Arizona State University. http://geopig.asu.edu/sites/default/files/slop98.dat. Last accessed 2013/08/12
  10. Tanger J, Helgeson H (1988) Calculation of the thermodynamic and transport properties of aqueous species at high pressures and temperatures: revised equations of state for the standard partial molal properties of ions and electrolytes. Am J Sci 288:19–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Yeriomin O (2011) Calculation of standard thermodynamic potentials for Na-zeolites with the use of linear programming problems. Int J Geosci 2:227–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zvereva V (2008) Environmental consequences of the hypergene processes at tin ore deposits of the Far East. Dal’nauka, VladivostokGoogle Scholar
  13. Zvereva V, Krupskaya L (2012) Anthropogenic waters in the Komsomolsk, Kavalerovskii, and Dalnegorsk mining areas of the Far East and their impact on the hydrosphere. Russ J Gen Chem 82(13):2244–2252CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Far Eastern Federal UniversityVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations