Advertisement

Seçil and Sefa: Protest as an Act of Belonging

  • Ilgın Yörükoğlu
Chapter
  • 6 Downloads
Part of the Citizenship, Gender and Diversity book series (FEMCIT)

Abstract

This chapter describes a case of two activists, Seçil and Sefa, whose seemingly contradictory (but, I think, equally problematic) positions end up legitimizing each other. Following Rey Chow’s “the protesting ethnic”, I take protest as an act of belonging. Crucially, both Seçil and Sefa have to rely on the opposition between two imagined communities to maintain their own self. Change, conflict, heterogeneity exist within all circles (among minorities as well as within the larger society). When an individual has developed their identity based on or as an opposition to a strictly defined “other”, they will have to disregard the changing/evolving/conflicting-within-itself Other so as to manage their own existential anxiety.

Keywords

Ethnic Protest Native informant Activism 

References

  1. Caglar, A.S. 2001. Constraining Metaphors and the Transnationalization of Spaces in Berlin. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 27 (4): 601–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chancer, L. 2005. High-Profile Crimes: When Legal Cases Become Social Causes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chow, R. 2002. The Protestant Ethnic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dabashi, H. 2011. Brown Skin. London and New York: White Masks, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  5. de Weerd, M., and B. Klandermans. 1999. Group Identification and Social Protest: Farmers’ Protest in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 1073–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drury, J., and S. Reicher. 2009. Collective Psychological Empowerment as a Model of Social Change: Researching Crowds and Power. Journal of Social Issues 65: 707–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Tayeb, F. 2011. European Others: Queering Ethnicity in Postnational Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Joppke, C. 2009. Successes and Failures of Muslim Integration in France and Germany. In Bringing Outsiders In: Transatlantic Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation, ed. Jennifer L. Hochschild and John H. Mollenkopf, 115–116. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Koopmans, R., and P. Statham. 2000. Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics: Comparative European Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Malabou, C. 2012. Ontology of the Accident: An Essay on Destructive Plasticity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ross, L. 2019. I’m a Black Feminist. I Think Call-Out Culture Is Toxic. . Nytimes.Com, August 17. Accessed 7 Sept 2019. Available at: https//www.nytimes.com/2019/08/17/opinion/sunday/cancel-culture-call-out.html.
  12. Said, E. 2002. Power, Politics, and Culture: Interviews with Edward W. Said. New York and Toronto: Vintage.Google Scholar
  13. Simon, B., and B. Klandermans. 2001. Towards a Social Psychological Analysis Of Politicized Collective Identity: Conceptualization, Antecedents, and Consequences. American Psychologist 56 (4): 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Spivak, G.C. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stehle, M. 2012. Ghetto Voices in Contemporary German Culture: Textscapes, Filmscapes, Soundscapes. London: Camdenhouse.Google Scholar
  16. Stryker, S., T.J. Owens, and R.W. White. 2000. Self, Identity, And Social Movements. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Van Stekelenburg, J., and B. Klandermans. 2007. Individuals in Movements: A Social Psychology of Contention. In The Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines, ed. C.M. Roggeband and B. Klandermans, 157–204. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Van Troost, D., J. van Stekelenburg, and B. Klandermans. 2013. Emotions of Protest. In Emotions in Politics: The Affect Dimension in Political Tension, ed. N. Demertzis. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Wolfe, Patrick. 2002. Can the Muslim Speak? An Indebted Critique: History and Theory 41 (3): 367–380.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilgın Yörükoğlu
    • 1
  1. 1.New York CityUSA

Personalised recommendations