Advertisement

The Map and Territory in Political Islam: Spatial Ideology and the Teaching of Geography by the Islamic State

  • Matthieu CiminoEmail author
Chapter
  • 17 Downloads
Part of the Mobility & Politics book series (MPP)

Abstract

Since the advent of the Islamic State (Dā’ish) in 2014, very few works have sought to question the territorial ideology and spatial representations which underlie its political imagination. Even if the movement has engaged—with considerable celerity—in a massive enterprise of conquest, neither its leaders nor the ideology itself has adequately communicated how it represents and categorizes this territory and, more broadly, the territory. Thus, how does ISIS project its conception of the world around it in terms of spatial reality? What do the notions of space, territory, and boundary(ies) mean for a transnational movement whose transcendent ideology calls for the unity of an Umma based on the denial of belonging to any traditional ethnic, racial, or national group? Based on the analysis of hundreds of propaganda documents produced by Dā’ish between 2015 and 2016, this paper will explore ISIS’s territorial ideology, as well as its strategy to symbolically represent its imaginary borders and disseminate it via its “Ministry of Education” (diwān at-ta’līm). By studying the fascicles and “official” school textbooks, including dozens of volumes on geography, this chapter will also provide a historical reflection on the interaction between space(s), border(s), and territory(ies) in the contemporary Arab world.

References

  1. Adraoui, Mohamed-Ali. 2016. The Issue of Borders and Sovereignty in the Islamist Thought from the Early Years to the Present Times. Communication at the Middle East Studies Association. Panel 4365. Borders and Boundaries in the Mashreq. Boston, November 20.Google Scholar
  2. Alayan, Samira, Sarhan Dhouib, and Achim Rohde (dir.). 2012. The Politics of Education Reform in the Middle East: Self and Other in Textbooks and Curricula. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  3. Ancel, Jacques. 1938. Géographie des frontières. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  4. Atwan, Abdel B. 2015. Islamic State—The Digital Caliphate. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Badie, Bertrand. 1995. La fin des territoires. Essai sur le désordre international et l’utilité sociale du respect. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  6. Barth, Fredrik. 1998. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bhabha, Homi K. 1990. Nation and Narration. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  9. Brauer, Ralph W. 1995. Boundaries and Frontiers in Medieval Muslim Geography. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 85 (6): 1–73.Google Scholar
  10. Cimino, Matthieu. 2017. Penser la spatialité en Islam militant: le cas des manuels scolaires de géographie de l’État islamique (2015–2016). Confluences Méditerranée 101 (2): 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duchacek, Ivo D. 1986. The Territorial Dimension of Politics: Within, Among, and Across Nations. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ferguson, Jeanne, and Claude Raffestin. 1986. Elements for a Theory of the Frontier. Diogènes 34 (134): 1–18.Google Scholar
  13. Foucher, Michel. 2013. La méta-frontière chez Samuel Huntington ou l’avenir d’une représentation. Anatoli. De l’Adriatique à la Caspienne. Territoires, Politique, Sociétés 4: 111–116.Google Scholar
  14. Grobsy, Steven. 1997. Borders, Territory and Nationality in the Ancient Near East and Armenia. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 40 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
  15. Halbwachs, Maurice. 2013. Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris: Albin Michel (first published in 1925).Google Scholar
  16. Internet Archive. 2014. Kasr al-ḥudūd sāyks-bīkū. https://archive.org/details/aboasd30_hotmail_201407. Accessed November 23, 2019.
  17. Morabia, Alfred. 2013. Le Ğihâd dans l’Islam médiéval. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  18. Newman, David, and Anssi Paasi. 1998. Fences and Neighbours in the Postmodern World: Boundary Narratives in Political Geography. Progress in Human Geography 22 (2): 186–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ohmae, Kenichi. 1990. The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  20. Parvin, Manoucher, and Maurie Sommer. 1980. Dar al-Islam: The Evolution of Muslim Territoriality and Its Implications for Conflict Resolution in the Middle East. International Journal of Middle East Studies 11 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Qaddour, Kinana. 2017. Inside ISIS’ Dysfunctional Schools—The Failure of the Group’s Educational System. Foreign Affairs, October 13.Google Scholar
  22. Tixier du Mesnil, Emmanuelle. 2010. Panorama de la géographie arabe médiévale. In Géographes et voyageurs au Moyen Âge, ed. Emmanuelle Tixier du Mesnil. Nanterre: Presses universitaires de Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations