Advertisement

Syncope pp 211-218 | Cite as

The Syncope Evaluation Unit: Essential Features, Current Status

  • Kathleen E. Walsh
  • Mohamed H. HamdanEmail author
Chapter
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Syncope/Collapse is a common syndrome in the general population caused by various etiologies. Given the often, complex presentations, there is a wide variability in the management of patients with syncope/collapse resulting in significant differences in outcome and high cost burden. Syncope units (SUs) have been developed with the intent of ensuring a systematic approach toward the evaluation of patients with transient loss of consciousness from risk stratification to diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up. Several studies have shown that SUs improve the rate of diagnosis and decrease rates of admissions and unnecessary tests utilization. The ideal SU should have resources for interdisciplinary testing and consultations available in a timely manner. In this chapter, we discuss the several models of successful SUs available in addition to future perspectives in addressing this ongoing challenge.

Keywords

Syncope evaluation Syncope units Faint and fall clinic Implantable loop recorders Telemedicine Syncope. 

References

  1. 1.
    Lamb LE, Green HC, Combs JJ, Cheeseman SA, Hammond J. Incidence of loss of consciousness in 1,980 Air Force personnel. Aerosp Med. 1960;31:973–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, Blanc JJ, Brignole M, Dahm JB, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009): task force for the diagnosis and management of syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2009;30(21):2631–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, Chen MH, Chen L, Benjamin EJ, et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(12):878–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen LY, Shen WK, Mahoney DW, Jacobsen SJ, Rodeheffer RJ. Prevalence of syncope in a population aged more than 45 years. Am J Med. 2006;119(12):1088.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costantino G, Sun BC, Barbic F, Bossi I, Casazza G, Dipaola F, et al. Syncope clinical management in the emergency department: a consensus from the first international workshop on syncope risk stratification in the emergency department. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(19):1493–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shen WK, Decker WW, Smars PA, Goyal DG, Walker AE, Hodge DO, et al. Syncope evaluation in the emergency department study (SEEDS): a multidisciplinary approach to syncope management. Circulation. 2004;110(24):3636–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun BC, McCreath H, Liang LJ, Bohan S, Baugh C, Ragsdale L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of an emergency department observation syncope protocol versus routine inpatient admission. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(2):167–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daccarett M, Jetter TL, Wasmund SL, Brignole M, Hamdan MH. Syncope in the emergency department: comparison of standardized admission criteria with clinical practice. Europace. 2011;13(11):1632–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kenny RA, Brignole M, Dan GA, Deharo JC, Van Dijk JG, Doherty C, et al. Syncope Unit: rationale and requirement--the European Heart Rhythm Association position statement endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2015;17(9):1325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newton JL, Marsh A, Frith J, Parry S. Experience of a rapid access blackout service for older people. Age Ageing. 2010;39(2):265–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petkar S, Bell W, Rice N, Iddon P, Cooper P, McKee D, et al. Initial experience with a rapid access blackouts triage clinic. Clin Med. 2011;11(1):11–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brignole M, Hamdan MH. New concepts in the assessment of syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(18):1583–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodriguez-Entem F, Gonzalez-Enriquez S, Olalla-Antolin JJ, Cobo-Belaustegui M, Exposito-Garcia V, Llano-Cardenal M, et al. Management of syncope in the emergency department without hospital admission: usefulness of an arrhythmia unit coordinated protocol. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008;61(1):22–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sousa P, Marques N, Faria R, Trigo J, Chin J, Amado J, et al. Syncope unit: experience of a center using diagnostic flowcharts for syncope of uncertain etiology after initial assessment. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013;32(7–8):581–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamdan MH, Walsh KE, Brignole M, Key J. Outreach syncope clinic managed by a nurse practitioner: outcome and cost effectiveness. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(8):566–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anpalahan M, Gibson S. The prevalence of neurally mediated syncope in older patients presenting with unexplained falls. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23(2):e48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Wisconsin—MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations