Advertisement

Jury Selection and Psychology of the Trial

  • Lenore E. WalkerEmail author
  • David Shapiro
  • Stephanie Akl
Chapter
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Despite skepticism that psychologists were mind readers and could manipulate people, coupled with concern over attorneys and even mental health professionals that might overstep their bounds, the area of trial consultation and jury selection has become an important area of forensic psychology. Much of the research and development in this area stems from social psychology, and methods such as public opinion polls, focus groups, mock trials, and analogue jury studies are used to accomplish the goals of, preparing witnesses for their statements and selecting (or, rather, deselecting) jurors in the voir dire, or the process by which juries are chosen for a trial. Forensic psychologists serving as trial consultants also use research to assist the attorney in trial strategies such as decisions on which pieces of evidence to emphasize, how to arrange evidence in terms of order of presentation, preparation of opening and closing statements, and determining when and if a change of venue is necessary in order to obtain a fair trial for clients, among other tasks.

Keywords

Trial consultation Jury selection Voir dire Focus groups Mock trial Witness Evidence presentation 

References

  1. American Bar Association. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org.
  2. Clark, M., & Carpenter, T. (1997). Without a doubt. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  3. Grisham, J. (1996). Runaway jury. New York, NY: Doubleday Press.Google Scholar
  4. Kasin, S., & Wrightsman, L. (1988). The American jury on trial: Psychological perspectives. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  5. Kravitz, D. A, Cutler, B. L., & Brock, P. (1993). Reliability and validity of the original and revised Legal Attitudes Questionnaire. Law and Human Behavior, 17(6), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044688
  6. Kleinman, T. G. (2004). The importance of domestic violence-sensitive language. Journal of Child Custody, 1(4), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J190v01n04_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lieberman, J. D., & Sales, B. D. (2007). Scientific jury selection. American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/11498-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ross, S. J., & Morera, O. F. (2015). Comparing legal attitudes of Anglo- and Latino-Americans: Confirming the factor structure of the Legal Attitudes Questionnaire. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 14(3), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2016.1187233.
  9. Stapp, J. (1996). Careers in psychology: Trial consultant. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/careers/resources/profiles/stapp.
  10. Taylor, K. (2019a, November 22). Thousands of texts at center of case against woman charged in boyfriend’s suicide. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/22/us/Inyoung-You-texting-suicide-court.html.
  11. Taylor, K. (2019b, July 9). What we know about the Michelle Carter texting suicide case. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/michelle-carter-i-love-you-now-die.html.
  12. Wrightsman, L. (2001). Forensic psychology. Cambridge, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lenore E. Walker
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Shapiro
    • 2
  • Stephanie Akl
    • 3
  1. 1.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA
  2. 2.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA
  3. 3.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations